Wyo Wildlife Task Force recommendation to increase special NR fee

jm77

Long Time Member
Messages
3,343
The next interim meeting of the Travel, Rec and Wildlife Committee of the Wyo Legislature on Oct 25th will include the WWTF recommendation to raise NR elk, deer and antelope special price fees. They are asking for $1948 for elk and $1198 for deer and antelope. The draft bill will be considered by the TRW Committee for sponsorship during the next regular session in 2023.

 
On the positive side there might be more tags available. Allocated similar to NR General Deer tags, by region.

 
C078C54A-FE9B-4BFC-AC34-783A8DD05419.png
 
I'll be burning my 14 elk points next year, and can't wait for the hunt, and getting out of the points scam. I kill elk every year in my home state, and we have no points..
 
Enough that those that want a tag will pay the price. At least the TF is counting on that, while the outfitters get booked out a few more years and lease up what little private land is left to hunt on.
That is the big issue. The outfitters pushing for this as they believe it is a path to more it’s, and income… I have a feeling if you asked the outfitters they would prefer to see the lock cost 3-4 times higher than proposed…
 
I could probably afford $1200 for antelope, but I could find better ways to spend that amount of money. I'd likely go on a cow elk hunt instead. Or I could go hunt birds and do some fishing in Wyoming for a week. Lots of other options. But even $600 is too much for an antelope in my mind. Or if I decide to spend $1200 for an antelope license it would be a one time thing. I'd do it once, probably just to burn my points and then never apply for a buck antelope license in Wyoming ever again.
 
If the “common man” can’t afford those prices on 75k he needs to look in the mirror for the reason why.
You sure about that?

Average mortgage in US $1100/month
Average home owners insurance $125/month
Average utilities $300/month
Average new car payment $667/month
Average care insurance $148/month
Average price of food per month for 1 person $150-$300/month.

$6228 month, figure 25% off the top for taxes.

That leaves $4671 after taxes.

Those other expenses equal $2,640 leaving a person with $2031.

Since pensions are now toast...you have to save for your retirement, say another 10% of gross. That's another 620 a month.

Leaving a person with $1411 per month.

Of course we haven't talked about fuel for the vehicle, oil changes, clothing, any college loans, etc.

Its easy for guys that have established themselves 30 years ago to preach about what the average US worker should be able to afford on $6200 a month.

It's a whole other thing for the people actually living it under the current prices of the basics.

An example of the BS that the politicians say about wages being so "high", they haven't come close to keeping up with inflation and price of goods. My parents bought the home they still own in Missoula for $35,000 in 1978 and my Dad was working in the timber industry making about 30K a year. Meaning just a bit more than a years wages would about pay for the house.

The home next door to my parents sold about 3 weeks ago for $595,000. Their home is about the same.

Show me a timber industry worker in Missoula making $500K a year...

Sorry Bob, but 6k a month is big money to someone that paid 30k for a home 15-30 years ago. That wage doesn't mean anything to the younger generation just starting out in building a retirement, buying a home at ridiculous prices, etc. etc.

So, no, many making that wage simply won't have the money to buy $2000 elk tags and $1200 deer and pronghorn tags. Its not because they aren't being responsible, its because the basics ain't cheap.
 
That's a ridiculous price increase. I hope this proposal goes down in flames and it honestly would not effect me, because I'm a resident. The taskforce is rotten... Only good thing to come out of it, was when it was fresh. (Once in a lifetime for the big 5.)
 
You sure about that?

Average mortgage in US $1100/month
Average home owners insurance $125/month
Average utilities $300/month
Average new car payment $667/month
Average care insurance $148/month
Average price of food per month for 1 person $150-$300/month.

$6228 month, figure 25% off the top for taxes.

That leaves $4671 after taxes.

Those other expenses equal $2,640 leaving a person with $2031.

Since pensions are now toast...you have to save for your retirement, say another 10% of gross. That's another 620 a month.

Leaving a person with $1411 per month.

Of course we haven't talked about fuel for the vehicle, oil changes, clothing, any college loans, etc.

Its easy for guys that have established themselves 30 years ago to preach about what the average US worker should be able to afford on $6200 a month.

It's a whole other thing for the people actually living it under the current prices of the basics.

An example of the BS that the politicians say about wages being so "high", they haven't come close to keeping up with inflation and price of goods. My parents bought the home they still own in Missoula for $35,000 in 1978 and my Dad was working in the timber industry making about 30K a year. Meaning just a bit more than a years wages would about pay for the house.

The home next door to my parents sold about 3 weeks ago for $595,000. Their home is about the same.

Show me a timber industry worker in Missoula making $500K a year...

Sorry Bob, but 6k a month is big money to someone that paid 30k for a home 15-30 years ago. That wage doesn't mean anything to the younger generation just starting out in building a retirement, buying a home at ridiculous prices, etc. etc.

So, no, many making that wage simply won't have the money to buy $2000 elk tags and $1200 deer and pronghorn tags. Its not because they aren't being responsible, its because the basics ain't cheap.
Yep, those tag prices are designed to kick the average guy in the sack.
 
Nonres antelope license prices:
Montana - $205
New Mexico - $283
Utah - $337
Colorado - $420

Take a look at surrounding state's nonres antelope license fees. Although $1,200 for antelope is outrageous (especially for blue collar families), I would be willing to pay it. Especially if tag quotas remain the same and there are no outfitter set aside tags. As mentioned several times above, I'm sure every limited tag will likely be sold.

My guess is nonres draw odds will likely increase as some nonres draw tags and drop out and other nonres decide to apply in states with cheaper license fees. The biggest benefit to nonres is that some units may actually have good to excellent draw odds if hunters drop out applying.

I can ask those that are against the price increase if they would rather see nonres tag quotas cut in 1/2 with outfitter set asides or if they would rather see a license fee increase with no outfitter set asides? I'm pretty sure most of us agree that outfitter set asides are a bad idea and the increase in cost is worth the compromise. I'm sure a few more wealthy outfitted hunters will draw tags but at least all tags are available to everyone equally in the drawing.

A $1,200 antelope tag sure bites into my measly budget but....I love to hunt Wyoming antelope and will save my hard-earned $ and find a way to buy expensive antelope and other big game tags in Wyoming. I hate to see Wyo go down the road of over-pricing tags for the average Joe but if it means no set aside tags going to outfitters I'm all for it!
 
Last edited:
I can ask those that are against the price increase if they would rather see nonres tag quotas cut in 1/2 with outfitter set asides or if they would rather see a license fee increase with no outfitter set asides? I'm pretty sure most of us agree that outfitter set asides are a bad idea and the increase in cost is worth the compromise. I'm sure a few more wealthy outfitted hunters will draw tags but at least all tags are available to everyone equally in the drawing.

I would rather Wyoming Grow a set and tell the Outfitters to get bent. I would rather Wyoming increase their fees modestly and only enough to balance their budget.

Why do we have to pick the lesser of two evils?
 
I would rather Wyoming Grow a set and tell the Outfitters to get bent. I would rather Wyoming increase their fees modestly and only enough to balance their budget.

Why do we have to pick the lesser of two evils?
Go ahead and start in your own state telling the outfitters to piss off
 
$1948 for an elk tag – many of which aren’t that great unless you have an outfitter with a landowner lease. Or an outfitter that can get you access to the wilderness area.

Ahh, I see now what WYOGA/WYGFD is doing here to get outfitted tags.

I just wish I had been smart enough to exit WY points earlier.

Can they print the special tags on gold paper? Regular tag holders wear a black dot on the forehead? We need objective identifiers if WYGFD is going to make this caste system work.
 
Outfitter set asides and jacking up prices to help their clients draw more tags seems like a pretty selfish idea that only benefits the wealthy. Now that seems like a pretty self-centered idea that benefits only a small fraction of nonres to me.

I believe lobbying to save 1/2 the available tags offered to ALL nonres hunters is not being selfish or self-centered! I’m sure every diy/oyo nonres was super excited when outfitter set asides were canned. I’m pretty sure most nonres are in favor of paying higher license fees in exchange for not losing 1/2 of their tag allotments as outfitter set aside tags.

We have gone circles around 90/10 so many years and it hasn’t happened. I doubt it will ever happen especially if nonres contribute even more $ to the WG&F pie by paying even higher license prices!

The 2nd reason 90/10 won’t happen is because 90/10 would be like outfitters slitting their own throats! It’s pretty obvious from this years heated task force sessions and fiascos that outfitters want something in exchange for 90/10. Outfitters tried just about everything in the book and it didn’t happen! I’m pretty sure every member of the task force is totally burned out on bickering about this subject.

Yep, Buzz I’m a horrible, selfish guy that could cares less about diy/oyo nonres hunters! Bull honky!
 
Sebastian, you only do care about yourself, that's been obvious since day one.

I don't think many NR's are too excited to be paying the higher fees.

Oh, and just for the record, 90/10 did happen for sheep, moose, goat, grizzly, and bison...

Still think it "won't happen"?

It already did... ?
 
Use your head Buzz, why do you think the outfitters ok’d the big 5 around the first TF meeting without blinking an eye? They thought at the time they would be able to work out a deal for a,d, and elk…which we all know backfired numerous times at TF meetings.

I can pretty much guarantee the outfitters aren’t going to allow res to take any more nonres tags without some sort of battle and “sly or may I say “Cy” transaction that will benefit only them!

We ought to start a poll. How many nonres are in favor of losing 1/2 their current quota of limited tags to outfitter set asides? How many nonres have up to 16 years of paying for high pref pt fees and have a vested interest supporting WG&F revenue? It would require twice as long to draw the same limited tags with 90/10.

Yep, I’m sure 90/10 won’t happen unless the outfitters somehow weasel out a lame deal that only benefits them.
 
As a resident I would like to complain. I didn't draw deer, elk and antelope. But I did draw a extra doe deer tag, harvested a great whitetail this year with my general. Man this sucks, and hopefully fill my doe tag this week with the muzzy. Again this sucks
 
Nfh, send me a text and maybe I can point you in a direction to draw some great deer, elk, and antelope tags. Your draw odds are actually pretty darn good! I know several Wyo res ((Buzz included) that draw multiple elk, deer, and antelope tags each and every year.
 
Nfh, send me a text and maybe I can point you in a direction to draw some great deer, elk, and antelope tags. Your draw odds are actually pretty darn good! I know several Wyo res ((Buzz included) that draw multiple elk, deer, and antelope tags each and every year.

I set myself up not to draw. Elk is tough to draw due to not many tags but I love late season hunts so the wait is worth it, I always got general to fall onto but with my work schedule I don't have enough time. Production at work always starts in September and I have to be there for programming, last year i didn't even get to complete my vacation after harvesting a ram since I was home 12 days early.. Deer I went several years in a row drawing then it tapered off as others learned you can buy a general tag if you draw a type 3. Antelope I went I think 6 years in a row then 2 years no luck and last year I didn't apply. This year I applied and 3 family members I talked into apply. Was to late to do a party app. They all drew but I didn't, but best part was we knocked down 3 goats in one day and that was more fun then being a shooter.

I cant complain.
 
Nfh, send me a text and maybe I can point you in a direction to draw some great deer, elk, and antelope tags. Your draw odds are actually pretty darn good! I know several Wyo res ((Buzz included) that draw multiple elk, deer, and antelope tags each and every year.
I know Colorado residents that get multiple tags a year for deer, elk and pronghorn.

That's the expectations for being a resident.

Most states are 90/10 for allocations, another expectation of residency.
 
And what's your definition of great tags jims? I think my idea of a great tag might be allot different then yours
 
As a resident I would like to complain. I didn't draw deer, elk and antelope. But I did draw a extra doe deer tag, harvested a great whitetail this year with my general. Man this sucks, and hopefully fill my doe tag this week with the muzzy. Again this sucks
What I am hearing is NR will get the choice to pay more for better odds and residents don't get that choice or higher allocations for DEA. Hmmmm...
 
Wyo res could actually set up draws similar to nonres if they really wanted to. There are options for residents but they aren’t willing to change. Bonus pt systems, waiting periods, or pay a little more for better draw odds are all valid options. Waiting periods would be a solution to allowing those that haven’t drawn tags better draw odds. Wyo res haven’t been willing to accept any new options that would improve draw odds.

I think most Wyo res are satisfied with how things are and draw multiple tags regularly. That’s one major reason they don’t want change.

Residents also have the option of hunting general deer and elk each and every year if they don’t draw limited tags. Generally the only res that don’t draw tags regularly are those that apply each year for the toughest high demand units in the state.

Great tags are ones that are drawn…and with a little research and work produce great bucks and bulls that fill the freezer!

I’m sure you’ve seen my tables of draw stats before so you are aware that Wyo res draw odds are much better than nonres odds in the random pool. You may also remember some of my waiting period tables? It’s similar tables that the TF used to compare res vs nonres draw odds with and without 90/10 and waiting periods. The TF tables opened the eyes of its members to what is going on in regard to draw odds with current vs possibly new draw options. What I found revealing was draw odds with several of these options was much better than the few additional tags offered by 90/10.

If Wyo res want better draw odds there are a number of viable options! It certainly seems like Wyo res have no problem filling their freezers and are pretty happy with things exactly how they are.
 
Wasn't the point of the "Special" price tag to improve odds for those willing to pay more? It seems like that has not been the case lately so raising the cost to a point where it gets back to that point seems like how that tag was intended in the first place.
 
So us residents should settle for lesser units, so NR like you have better odds. You float in the same boat as Tristate.....an idiot.

You're a huge hypocrite. If the lesser units are so great why did you scam your handicap hunter "friend" out of his points for one of the hardest deer units to draw. Why not just go general deer? You talk out both sides of your mouth.
why did you scam your handicap hunter "friend" out of his points for one of the hardest deer units to draw..
That's about a D!$% move if true!
 
Last edited:
Again with the outfitters, the outfitters are a business trying to survive in a hostile environment brought about by the residents. they were happy the way it was but that's not something they can sustain any longer , so don't put this turd in their pocket.

As far as the prices go, I don't like it but if I can take advantage of it I will. I'm not really sure you can say it's unfair if they leave the regular tag price where it is, you don't have to pay the hose job price if you don't want to, and who ever said life was fair in the first place.
 
Again with the outfitters, the outfitters are a business trying to survive in a hostile environment brought about by the residents. they were happy the way it was but that's not something they can sustain any longer , so don't put this turd in their pocket.

As far as the prices go, I don't like it but if I can take advantage of it I will. I'm not really sure you can say it's unfair if they leave the regular tag price where it is, you don't have to pay the hose job price if you don't want to, and who ever said life was fair in the first place.
This is all about the outfitters. it is their idea and they are the ones pushing this in order to increase the draw odds of their wealthy clients.

Also any outfitter that is half way decent is not having a hard time running a business... They are just overly greedy and what even more government welfare. Care to explain why you think they are in a hostile environment? What exactly have the resident hunters done to make this hostile? This should be an amusing answer... If I recall correctly the average outfitter is making significantly more than the average income in WY.

The wilderness law is enough of an advantage for the outfitters. If they are offering the right product at the correct price point then the business will be just fine no need for the government to hand them anything...
 
Antelope and deer and silly, elk I don’t think is too unfair… Co should take notes, but hey let them dictate the price if they can’t sell the tags cause 1100 for a pronghorn is absurd they maybe they will come back down to earth… I’m guessing people will still buy those tags
 
This is all about the outfitters. it is their idea and they are the ones pushing this in order to increase the draw odds of their wealthy clients.

Also any outfitter that is half way decent is not having a hard time running a business... They are just overly greedy and what even more government welfare. Care to explain why you think they are in a hostile environment? What exactly have the resident hunters done to make this hostile? This should be an amusing answer... If I recall correctly the average outfitter is making significantly more than the average income in WY.

The wilderness law is enough of an advantage for the outfitters. If they are offering the right product at the correct price point then the business will be just fine no need for the government to hand them anything...


my oh my how do the outfitters survive that don't hunt the wilderness????

look at some of the sheep outfitters here taking over 15-20 sheep hunters a season. talk about raking the money in.
 
Again with the outfitters, the outfitters are a business trying to survive in a hostile environment brought about by the residents. they were happy the way it was but that's not something they can sustain any longer , so don't put this turd in their pocket.

As far as the prices go, I don't like it but if I can take advantage of it I will. I'm not really sure you can say it's unfair if they leave the regular tag price where it is, you don't have to pay the hose job price if you don't want to, and who ever said life was fair in the first place.
That's simply untrue, they were never happy with the way "it was" and they still aren't. If they were able to keep 50% of the tags for the outfitter draw, they'd want 75% the next year...just the way it is with them. If they could pull it off, every single hunter would be required to pay for an outfitted hunt...come on man.

If you're going to try to defend them at least be intellectually honest.

The outfitting industry passed a whole lot of stuff before the information age to benefit themselves over DIY NR's and Resident hunters.

They tried in the 90's to get set asides and were shot down, JM77 can fill you in on the details of that, I wasn't here yet.

They passed the wilderness guide law, no benefit to anyone but themselves.

They passed the NR preference system, no benefit to anyone but themselves.

They passed the tiered license fee structure, no benefit to anyone but themselves.

They lobbied twice to get the percentages changed from 60-40 to both 40-60 and 50-50 (making another run at it now) for the special/regular fees. No benefit to anyone but themselves.

They've pushed for ranching for wildlife programs, no benefit to anyone but themselves.

How you can make a claim that the Residents are hostile toward them is simply not true.

They have pushed multiple times to drop the 7250 NR elk tag cap, increasing general tags, etc.

WOGA sued the Commission and Department.

They pushed to limit the walk in and HMA programs by capping maximum pay-outs.

Residents have not pushed or advocated for any of the crap that WOGA has done.

The only hostility on display is from WOGA and its been that way for as long as I've lived here.

I guess the sympathy letter Sy and WOGA have sent you must be working, they get no quarter from me.

While myself and many other Sportsmen, NGO's, etc are financially supporting the Wildlife, the Department, with our time, talent and treasure, WOGA is working to plunder it all. All the while not financially supporting any of it with even a single thin dime.

They take with both hands and give nothing back...FACT.
 
@BuzzH I was visiting with an outfitter a month ago when the task force was getting heated. Well lets just say he was pretty hot over the decision that non residents and residents that voted over 96% to outfitter tags.

I had one simple question for him and that was well what is your contribution back to wildlife. Well that made him pause but he did reply they clean a lot of trails. I said ok fair enough but how many trails did i clean last year scouting for sheep so does that mean i should get a free hand out? well the rambling went on.


If 96% of us voted a big hell no on outfitter tags then in my mind the people have spoken.


I am not against outfitters at all. I have used them in other states for great hunts i will never forget. Even the info i got last year on some sheep was provided by a very good friend who owns a outfitting business and i return the favor of helping with electrical questions and among other things.

If you know how to run a outfitting company, scout, hunt, be personable, advertisement and blah blah the business will come but they dont deserve free handouts
 
Last edited:
@BuzzH I was visiting with an outfitter a month ago when the task force was getting heated. Well lets just say he was pretty hot over the decision that non residents and residents that voted over 96% to outfitter tags.

I had one simple question for him and that was well what is your contribution back to wildlife. Well that made him pause but he did reply they clean a lot of trails. I said ok fair enough but how many trails did i clean last year scouting for sheep so does that mean i should get a free hand out? well the rambling went on.


If 96% of us voted a big hell no on outfitter tags then in my mind the people have spoken.


I am not against outfitters at all. I have used them in other states for great hunts i will never forget. Even the info i got last year on some sheep was provided by a very good friend who owns a outfitting business and i return the favor of helping with electrical questions and among other things.

If you know how to run a outfitting company, scout, hunt, be personable, advertisement and blah blah the business will come but they dont deserve free handouts
Exactly. They have a product they are offering. If they offer a quality product at the correct price point then they will have a thriving business.

This current proposal is nothing more than an attempt to make hunting more exclusive…
 
@BuzzH I was visiting with an outfitter a month ago when the task force was getting heated. Well lets just say he was pretty hot over the decision that non residents and residents that voted over 96% to outfitter tags.

I had one simple question for him and that was well what is your contribution back to wildlife. Well that made him pause but he did reply they clean a lot of trails. I said ok fair enough but how many trails did i clean last year scouting for sheep so does that mean i should get a free hand out? well the rambling went on.


If 96% of us voted a big hell no on outfitter tags then in my mind the people have spoken.


I am not against outfitters at all. I have used them in other states for great hunts i will never forget. Even the info i got last year on some sheep was provided by a very good friend who owns a outfitting business and i return the favor of helping with electrical questions and among other things.

If you know how to run a outfitting company, scout, hunt, be personable, advertisement and blah blah the business will come but they dont deserve free handouts
Correct, and I hate to inform your buddy, but cleaning trails is helping the USFS, not the GF or wildlife. Plus, many of the trails they clean have very little traffic on them from anything other than their clients.

So, once again, if it doesn't exclusively benefit them, they don't want to be involved or supportive.

Ask them how much money they've contributed to AccessYes.
 
I know Colorado residents that get multiple tags a year for deer, elk and pronghorn.

That's the expectations for being a resident.

Most states are 90/10 for allocations, another expectation of residency.
Truth. I get so many tags between me and my two younguns we don't even hunt them all. In Colorado. And our allocation is actually 55 percent after the landowner set asides and nonresident 35 percent. Tags are all over with some planning.
 
Again with the outfitters, the outfitters are a business trying to survive in a hostile environment brought about by the residents. they were happy the way it was but that's not something they can sustain any longer , so don't put this turd in their pocket.
6y51ub.jpg


Ask them how much money they've contributed to AccessYes.
They can't use Access Yes so I kind of get the not contributing. They darn sure don't contribute to wildlife management. Their licence fees go to the Wyo Outfitter Board. which they use to self-police their industry
Even if they did contribute to access yes they are stabbing that program right in the back by leasing public land for their exclusive use that might otherwise be enrolled in access yes
I think you mean leasing private land.
.
 
Correct, and I hate to inform your buddy, but cleaning trails is helping the USFS, not the GF or wildlife. Plus, many of the trails they clean have very little traffic on them from anything other than their clients.

So, once again, if it doesn't exclusively benefit them, they don't want to be involved or supportive.

Ask them how much money they've contributed to AccessYes.
 
The Forest Service pays the outfitters to clear trails. They do it with the 3% they collect on the gross sales.

Are you sure? That 3% upcharge flows from hunter to outfitter. Not from USFS to outfitter.

Do you have anything official to share on the legitimacy of that 3% “forest service fee” that SOME (not all) WY outfitters itemize on their bills?

I have never been able to find anything from any government officially condoning that 3% up-charge by WY outfitters. I believe it is probably something WYOGA decided they would start encouraging their members to add to receipts. To generally cover their USFS spike camp rentals (10 day rentals in Wilderness Areas) and their general USFS use permit. The business trick of adding an upcharge on your customer’s bill to cover something that is your usual cost of doing business.

Outfitters will imply to hunters that 3% passes through to the USFS – but I don’t believe that is technically true.
 
Plus a 4% lodging tax and 3% meal tax.

Most outfitter websites say pricing doesn't include these
 
Wyo residents can bash outfitters and nonres all they want. One of the biggest reasons 90/10 may never happen in Wyoming is the revenue generated by out of state hunters. Take a look at the economic impacts nonres have on Wyoming’s economy.


6DD8F2BC-7CC5-47BF-822F-6C9C4928D8E8.jpeg
E710B574-71DD-45E3-9769-710FCE9124E5.jpeg

E334C0EF-5122-4823-BE20-6FA09B0EDD0F.jpeg
 
Last edited:
In addition to impressive nonresident economy impacts that promote local business and improve Wyoming's boom and bust economy, nonresident also contribute over 77% of the license revenue to the WG&F. A 2nd major reason 90/10 may never happen!

Res_Vs_Non.jpg
 
You're twisting it up again.

How can you say the preference system only benefited the outfitters ? with it I've drawn moose, sheep, one of the hardest elk tags and deer tags in the state to draw and a 57 pronghorn tag. the only things I haven't drawn are Mt goat and Bison, and guess what, no preference points on those. and outfitters only got money from me on 2 of those hunts and they were worth every penny. the point system has been a winner for me, thank you outfitters.

Are you trying to say the outfitters are the ones who pushed to change the NR allocation of 20% to 10% and you've been fighting against them ? a simple yes or no will do, we can't have any meaningful debate as to the outfitters culpability in this situation at all until we establish who actually upset the NR's apple cart. do tell.
 
I am a prime example of the NR "common man" that won't be applying for any of the special tags at those crazy prices. Through the years I have drawn several bull tags in the special and it has been a good deal. But 2K is ridiculous unless your getting a prime LE tag. All but 1 of mine have been general season.
Since the outfitters are the driving force behind this crazy increase, perhaps they should pay the price difference for their booked NR hunters when instructing them to apply in the special.
For the guys with a 6 figure income, and drive a 80 or 90K $$ truck, this may not be a big deal. But for a working class man with 4 kids still at home, I will have to take my chances in the regular.
It's sad to see the realization of what hunting has come to. The "common man" is being closed out from many different angles.
 
Again, the outfitters did not create this situation. they're trying to navigate a pathway to save their business. as a capitalist businessman myself I understand where they're coming from.

Before you jump on someone with an investment in a business that got the rug pulled out from under them ask yourself why they'd want to cut your allotment in half ?
 
Wyo residents can bash outfitters and nonres all they want. One of the biggest reasons 90/10 may never happen in Wyoming is the revenue generated by out of state hunters. Take a look at the economic impacts nonres have on Wyoming’s economy.


View attachment 91135View attachment 91141
View attachment 91142
I know it probably doesn't amount to much, but when I draw a tag out west in a state that is favorable to DIY nonresident like myself, I make sure to spend all my ancillary dollars in that state. On my recent antelope hunt for my son, we flew into Denver, but bought all our camping gear in Wyoming, stayed in Wyoming hotels when we weren't camping afield, ate at local Wyoming restaurants when we weren't camping, and when we got got done, found a local Wyoming resident with 2 young daughters to give all our camping gear to ( sleeping bags, camp stove, cookware, etc to) in the hopes their Dad would get them involved in the outdoors as they aged.

Compared to states like New Mexico where I used to apply, but percentages of tags alloted to DIY NR were wiped down to almost nothing... I no longer apply there, have no desire to ever visit, nor support the local economy or people.

You Wyoming folks are GOOD people... I hope I can continue to visit your state in the future, and make lifelong friends out there.

That being said... I can afford the NR special price increases... but it frustrates the heck out of me that it's done mostly for the benefit of the outfitters and prices many average folks out of the game.

Will be interesting for sure to see how the draw odds shake out next year for the high dollar NR special tags.
 
Supply and demand have a direct effect on any commodity. in this case the quantity was artificially manipulated but the fundamentals remain the same. cut the supply in half the price will go up. who did that ? if you say the outfitters I'm going to scream.
 
Supply and demand have a direct effect on any commodity. in this case the quantity was artificially manipulated but the fundamentals remain the same. cut the supply in half the price will go up. who did that ? if you say the outfitters I'm going to scream.
Whatever you say.
 
Supply and demand have a direct effect on any commodity. in this case the quantity was artificially manipulated but the fundamentals remain the same. cut the supply in half the price will go up. who did that ? if you say the outfitters I'm going to scream.
Except the supply wasn't cut in half and the outfitters still pushed to raise the nr license fees.

Please explain how in the hell the quantity was manipulated when it wasn't.
 
It’s simple math. If nonres tags are cut in 1/2 with 90/10 outfitters will likely have fewer customers. With fewer customers the outfitters plus guides likely will need to charge clients more to make the same amount of income. Some may go out of business if they have 1/2 their current clients. I’m sure guides will be all in favor of salary cuts with the inflating price of groceries and gas to drive customers around.

Fewer nonres will also cause a trickle down affect to small business owners across Wyo if there are 1/2 the nonres drawing tags and entering Wyo each and every year.

Fewer nonres will be willing to pay high pref pt fees if draw odds are cut in 1/2 with 90/10 so the WG&F are financial losers. The WG&F will also loose revenue selling 1/2 the number of nonres tags.

I think I’ve covered a few of many other trickle down financial losses in Wyo.
 
Wyo residents can bash outfitters and nonres all they want. One of the biggest reasons 90/10 may never happen in Wyoming is the revenue generated by out of state hunters. Take a look at the economic impacts nonres have on Wyoming’s economy.


View attachment 91135View attachment 91141
View attachment 91142
Bahahaha you're trying to tell me that non residents spend more at restaurants for a week or 2 that they are here over a resident who lives here all year?! Yea right!!!! Hahaha some very skewed data you have there
 
It’s simple math. If nonres tags are cut in 1/2 with 90/10 outfitters will likely have fewer customers. With fewer customers the outfitters plus guides likely will need to charge clients more to make the same amount of income. Some may go out of business if they have 1/2 their current clients. I’m sure guides will be all in favor of salary cuts with the inflating price of groceries and gas to drive customers around.

Fewer nonres will also cause a trickle down affect to small business owners across Wyo if there are 1/2 the nonres drawing tags and entering Wyo each and every year.

Fewer nonres will be willing to pay high pref pt fees if draw odds are cut in 1/2 with 90/10 so the WG&F are financial losers. The WG&F will also loose revenue selling 1/2 the number of nonres tags.

I think I’ve covered a few of many other trickle down financial losses in Wyo.
Your understanding of economics is laughable.

When did you make the determination that proper and fair allocations should take the back seat to economic output of a publicly held wildlife asset?

What other parts of wildlife management do think should be allowed to be controlled/manupulated simply by economic considerations?

Do you ever think before you post? I mean other than thinking first about yourself?
 
It’s simple math. If nonres tags are cut in 1/2 with 90/10 outfitters will likely have fewer customers. With fewer customers the outfitters plus guides likely will need to charge clients more to make the same amount of income. Some may go out of business if they have 1/2 their current clients. I’m sure guides will be all in favor of salary cuts with the inflating price of groceries and gas to drive customers around.

Fewer nonres will also cause a trickle down affect to small business owners across Wyo if there are 1/2 the nonres drawing tags and entering Wyo each and every year.

Fewer nonres will be willing to pay high pref pt fees if draw odds are cut in 1/2 with 90/10 so the WG&F are financial losers. The WG&F will also loose revenue selling 1/2 the number of nonres tags.

I think I’ve covered a few of many other trickle down financial losses in Wyo.
Oh and since you're so worried about the outfitting industry show us the receipts from the last guided hunt you booked in Wyoming. Surely with your concern over the low wages and inflation that guides and outfitters are suffering under you must be using their services? Yes?

Oh and I would also like you to show your receipts for all the restaurants, hotels, and grocery stores your shopping at in Wyoming. I mean again, you seem so passionate and concerned about the well being if Wyoming businesses you most certainly don't buy your groceries in Colorado at sam's club or Costco...

Classic hypocrite is well defined every time you look in the mirror.
 
And even with your skewed data on the bottom line look who spends more on your " total spending" line. Who'd thunk?
 
Bahahaha you're trying to tell me that non residents spend more at restaurants for a week or 2 that they are here over a resident who lives here all year?! Yea right!!!! Hahaha some very skewed data you have there
And nonhunter recreational users. I always ask small town service providers if they are busy when I'm there in hunting seasons. They always say not as busy as we are in the summer. We aren't as important to local economy as some others.
 
Bahahaha you're trying to tell me that non residents spend more at restaurants for a week or 2 that they are here over a resident who lives here all year?! Yea right!!!! Hahaha some very skewed data you have there
This is a major flaw in the thinking. Nonresidents show up for a week of the season at most. Some maybe longer, but a lot are here in WY for less than a week. As a resident my hunting season starts Aug 15th and does not end until November on average. Between hunting and scouting I have over 40 days a year in the field. That usually mean food, lots of fuel (a stupid amount of fuel), all my supplies bought with in the state (not hauling in food, ammo, fuel, from another state). It does not add up.
 
The proof that nr don't contribute a critical amount of revenue to Wyoming's economy is the fact that big game licenses have declined by the thousands and somehow the state, or small towns, are not ghost towns. The comment that tourism contributes more is totally correct considering visitors to Wyoming during May- Sept are in the millions.

Declines in energy jobs are far more critical in Wyoming's overall economy than a decline in nr hunters.
 
you big 5 hunters just got lucky, amendment failed

sheep 2318 to 3000
moose 1980 to 2750
goat 2160 to 2750
bison 4400 to 6000
bear 6000 to 7500
 
In addition to impressive nonresident economy impacts that promote local business and improve Wyoming's boom and bust economy, nonresident also contribute over 77% of the license revenue to the WG&F. A 2nd major reason 90/10 may never happen!

View attachment 91154

I’m new to this – but are you a Colorado resident by chance?

I think Colorado residents may be in the process of getting better resident allocation of tags. Maybe. Similar to what WY went through.

Rather than focusing on WY, I wonder if you might instead be able to have a bigger impact on what is going down in your state of residence - CO? In theory at least, your governor, commission, commissioners and legislators are more beholden to in state residents.
 
FK the outfitters and FK the g & f for the backroom dealing and the enabling to assist these welfare bums. does director nesvik get a kickback from sy & co.?

eidt: jm and buzz, you two like to be chummy with the g & f at times, but you know i'm right
 
Last edited:
You sure about that?

Average mortgage in US $1100/month
Average home owners insurance $125/month
Average utilities $300/month
Average new car payment $667/month
Average care insurance $148/month
Average price of food per month for 1 person $150-$300/month.

$6228 month, figure 25% off the top for taxes.

That leaves $4671 after taxes.

Those other expenses equal $2,640 leaving a person with $2031.

Since pensions are now toast...you have to save for your retirement, say another 10% of gross. That's another 620 a month.

Leaving a person with $1411 per month.

Of course we haven't talked about fuel for the vehicle, oil changes, clothing, any college loans, etc.

Its easy for guys that have established themselves 30 years ago to preach about what the average US worker should be able to afford on $6200 a month.

It's a whole other thing for the people actually living it under the current prices of the basics.

An example of the BS that the politicians say about wages being so "high", they haven't come close to keeping up with inflation and price of goods. My parents bought the home they still own in Missoula for $35,000 in 1978 and my Dad was working in the timber industry making about 30K a year. Meaning just a bit more than a years wages would about pay for the house.

The home next door to my parents sold about 3 weeks ago for $595,000. Their home is about the same.

Show me a timber industry worker in Missoula making $500K a year...

Sorry Bob, but 6k a month is big money to someone that paid 30k for a home 15-30 years ago. That wage doesn't mean anything to the younger generation just starting out in building a retirement, buying a home at ridiculous prices, etc. etc.

So, no, many making that wage simply won't have the money to buy $2000 elk tags and $1200 deer and pronghorn tags. Its not because they aren't being responsible, its because the basics ain't cheap.
Great post. Thanks for informing the uninformed.
 
FK the outfitters and FK the g & f for the backroom dealing and the enabling to assist these welfare bums. does director nesvik get a kickback from sy & co.?

eidt: jm and buzz, you two like to be chummy with the g & f at times, but you know i'm right
:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
Yeah right, there aren't two other guys that have stood up to outfitters AND the G&F more than "jm and buzz". So just keep flapping your dirty trap newbie.
 
$3000 would probably be the sweet spot for both WY F&G and NR hunters to both maximize revenue and provide increased odds for those willing to pay. The "special" tag is pointless unless it accomplishes both of those. In recent years it has not maximized either.
 
Colo is a nonres hunters paradise! Otc elk and antelope…and high quotas for limited d,e,a tags. Even the current limited tag cuts are equal or better than Wyo’s current quotas. Colo is well aware of the incredible economic boost nonres bring to small town business as well as the CPW.

Status quo for nonres tag quotas seem evident in Wyo. You can trash talk me and twist just about everything I post but it’s pretty apparent from what happened with this years TF that 90/10 is a pipe dream!
 
90/10 will happen, it is just a matter of when.

On topic, I actually don't have a problem with increasing the special license, it is a public resource and Wyoming should maximize its value. The special licenses will all sell out even at the new price. You can only argue the price is too high is if they dont sell out, demand is too strong. No one is making a NR put it on the special and anyone who is putting in for the special NR draw isn't going hungry due to a lack of meat.

The regular is staying the same (for now) and for those that have budget constraints they will have to wait a few more years to draw. You can argue what is or isn't fair, but I believe Wyoming owes it to public and the animal itself to maximize its value.
 
I doubt all the special priced licenses will be allocated in the special draw. Many will go into the regular draw. Surely not all the elk licenses are worth nearly $2,000. And the deer and antelope aren't all worth $1200.
 
Colo is a nonres hunters paradise! Otc elk and antelope…and high quotas for limited d,e,a tags. Even the current limited tag cuts are equal or better than Wyo’s current quotas. Colo is well aware of the incredible economic boost nonres bring to small town business as well as the CPW.

Status quo for nonres tag quotas seem evident in Wyo. You can trash talk me and twist just about everything I post but it’s pretty apparent from what happened with this years TF that 90/10 is a pipe dream!
Hey Sebastian, show us the receipts for the outfitters you've hired in Wyoming. While you're at it show us your hotel, grocery, restaurant, and fuel receipts from Wyoming.

Why do you never answer questions?
 
The real issue, and Wyoming is not alone in this, is corporate hunting on public ground. At some point, we public hunters are going to have to address the outfitter/guide problem we have in our states.

I'm not sure how, exactly, but I do know I can't call myself a driller and start drilling oil wherever I feel on public ground. Can't go logging. Can't go mining.

But somehow, while we snip at each other across state lines, a corporate system has risen up, and taken control of G&F departments across the west. These entities are no friend to us, compete with us, and Libby to eradicate us. And frankly, they compensate us, or the resource, barely if at all. They take and take, yet get to dictate conditions.

We are going to have to cross state lines and come together to end, or greatly reduce and limit the scourge that is creating this European game management system, and it needs to be across not just a state, but the entirety of FS and BLM.

Until we do, prices will accelerate, while opportunity will decrease in order to feed the corporate profit margin.
 
This is a major flaw in the thinking. Nonresidents show up for a week of the season
I respect both you and Buzz and many others Wyoming residents on this site, but I do not think it is a flaw at all, especially with general deer and elk tags available. You both still hunt a heck of a lot on general tags. This is about bringing money from outside the state into the state. If you cut that number of tags in half you lose half of that external revenue. If you were hunting general elk vs an easier to draw limited tag you probably spend the same amount, heck you might spend more time hunting the worse the tag is! I don't think either group is magically saving small towns, but more non-resident hunters means more money brought into the state. Maybe it doesn't matter because tourism in the summer and snow season pays the bills....that should be your argument.
 
Buzz, I’ve been scouting and hunting Wyo since the July draws. I’ve lost count of how many trips I’ve made. I probably have at least 2 more trips this fall/winter and will be fueling up my truck at local gas stations and buying a bit of food and items at businesses. You have no clue Buzz the $ I generate in Wyo each year.

The majority of Wyo res hunt from home and return each day after hunting. Res will buy food and eat whether they draw tags or not. Take another look at the survey tables in the post above of res vs nonres spending.
 
Buzz, I’ve been scouting and hunting Wyo since the July draws. I’ve lost count of how many trips I’ve made. I probably have at least 2 more trips this fall/winter and will be fueling up my truck at local gas stations and buying a bit of food and items at businesses. You have no clue Buzz the $ I generate in Wyo each year.

The majority of Wyo res hunt from home and return each day after hunting. Res will buy food and eat whether they draw tags or not. Take another look at the survey tables in the post above of res vs nonres spending.
So we don't have to buy food to have in our home? And our trucks dont use gas as long as we go home after we hunt? ? I hunt all year long for one species or another i have no off season. also I drive my truck to work 5 days a week and eat food here every day bought locally like every other resident of wyo. You are out there man
 
The thing is residents of a state spend their money in that state year around whether they hunt or not. The benefit of non residents coming into a state for any purpose, hunting or not, is that it brings additional money into that state.
 
I respect both you and Buzz and many others Wyoming residents on this site, but I do not think it is a flaw at all, especially with general deer and elk tags available. You both still hunt a heck of a lot on general tags. This is about bringing money from outside the state into the state. If you cut that number of tags in half you lose half of that external revenue. If you were hunting general elk vs an easier to draw limited tag you probably spend the same amount, heck you might spend more time hunting the worse the tag is! I don't think either group is magically saving small towns, but more non-resident hunters means more money brought into the state. Maybe it doesn't matter because tourism in the summer and snow season pays the bills....that should be your argument.
True to a point… But if you go license for license, a decrease in nonresident hunters and an increase in resident hunters is not a cut and dry decrease in spending or our economy…

The more opportunity to hunt as a resident the more money I spend. The more I break my truck, the more I pay in gas tax, the more ammo I buy, etc.

yes if we cut all NR out of the equation it would hurt. Reducing NR a percent would not be nearly as drastic as presented…

In the end time will tell. When 90/10 does happen, it will happen at some point, we will see what it finally does… I have a feeling it will not be nearly the sky is falling situation they make it out to be. We still have general tags for NR that will not be affected on both deer and elk, and with our growing elk issues there is likely going to be ample opportunity for elk hunters to harvest cows, etc.

So yes I think we all agree that decreasing NR allocation on draw only licenses will have an impact, the problem is the offset by resident spending and true offset is likely being way over stated…
 
Buzz, I’ve been scouting and hunting Wyo since the July draws. I’ve lost count of how many trips I’ve made. I probably have at least 2 more trips this fall/winter and will be fueling up my truck at local gas stations and buying a bit of food and items at businesses. You have no clue Buzz the $ I generate in Wyo each year.

The majority of Wyo res hunt from home and return each day after hunting. Res will buy food and eat whether they draw tags or not. Take another look at the survey tables in the post above of res vs nonres spending.
Show your receipts, in particular for the outfitter you surely must have on speed dial, you know, you caring so much about their well-being and all.
 
:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
Yeah right, there aren't two other guys that have stood up to outfitters AND the G&F more than "jm and buzz". So just keep flapping your dirty trap newbie.
i was actually throwing you a compliment. oh well, you continue to be a little internet bch as i'm sure reading comprehension is not a priority for you
 

Wyoming Hunting Guides & Outfitters

Badger Creek Outfitters

Offering elk, deer and pronghorn hunts on several privately owned ranches.

Urge 2 Hunt

We focus on trophy elk, mule deer, antelope and moose hunts and take B&C bucks most years.

J & J Outfitters

Offering quality fair-chase hunts for trophy mule deer, elk, and moose in Wyoming.


Yellowstone Horse Rentals - Western Wyoming Horses
Back
Top Bottom