elks96
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 3,792
So
Just ran the numbers for the units that have one shot tags. It is pretty interesting and will be very interested in finding out the biological
Reasons for minimal cuts in the units despite some very rough winter conditions…
So given high winter mortality the following g units are seeing the proposed cuts….
Unit 65 saw the tag allocation moved from 150 down to 100. A 33% decrease, however they are keeping a pile of type 7 tags that are good in 65 and 66. 75 reduced down from 100… why are we keeping Doe fawn tags if the conditions were bad enough to cut type 1 tags?
Unit 66 went from 125-100… 20% reduction
Unit 67 no cuts at all…keeping all 200 tags despite every surrounding unit getting a cut…
68 moving from 400-350…. Down 12.5%
106 going from 175-150 or 14%
I have a feeling this does not accurately reflect the winter kill in these areas and as a result should raise some questions about the motivation of the managers and why….
I will update what I hear from the meeting this week…
Just ran the numbers for the units that have one shot tags. It is pretty interesting and will be very interested in finding out the biological
Reasons for minimal cuts in the units despite some very rough winter conditions…
So given high winter mortality the following g units are seeing the proposed cuts….
Unit 65 saw the tag allocation moved from 150 down to 100. A 33% decrease, however they are keeping a pile of type 7 tags that are good in 65 and 66. 75 reduced down from 100… why are we keeping Doe fawn tags if the conditions were bad enough to cut type 1 tags?
Unit 66 went from 125-100… 20% reduction
Unit 67 no cuts at all…keeping all 200 tags despite every surrounding unit getting a cut…
68 moving from 400-350…. Down 12.5%
106 going from 175-150 or 14%
I have a feeling this does not accurately reflect the winter kill in these areas and as a result should raise some questions about the motivation of the managers and why….
I will update what I hear from the meeting this week…