Mirrorless, Interchangeable Lens Full Frame or APS-C

Both are great. Both are expensive. I have a Canon Mirrorless with Canon L lenses. Wonderful performance. To me worth the $. Others may feel differently. Go to YouTube and watch some videos by Fox + Fir to see what Canon can do.
7176EABF-1469-4659-9C44-267D479237BF.jpeg
3A6A3129.jpeg
IMG_2200_Original.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I have shot with Canon DSLR cameras and L lenses for years. I went with Canon because of the tried and true aspect of the company and the wide selection of lenses available. I see people shooting fantastic stuff with Sony but I am too invested in Canon equipment to ever make the switch. Just getting ready to invest in some mirrorless camera bodies. Either way you really can't go wrong.
 
I have shot with Canon DSLR cameras and L lenses for years. I went with Canon because of the tried and true aspect of the company and the wide selection of lenses available. I see people shooting fantastic stuff with Sony but I am too invested in Canon equipment to ever make the switch. Just getting ready to invest in some mirrorless camera bodies. Either way you really can't go wrong.
Your story sounds familiar. I made the jump a few years back and have never looked back. Your existing lens collection will work perfectly.
 
So full frame, mirrorless over the smaller, lighter APS-C?
Is the EOS R3 body worth it?
While money is always a factor getting quality stuff is important to me.
Mainly shooting big game.
Sometimes at distance.
 
For wildlife photography I use an APS-C body as you get more reach when you factor in the crop and yes its lighter and smaller. For landscape photography I use a full frame body.
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom