Search results

not sure where you are getting the no public access? because it is a requirement for participation in the program. The landowner can say that but they can be removed from LPP if this is the case. Happy to discuss via PM

In Colorado you are required to give access to your property on a unit wide tag

160 acres does not get you three applications in Colorado, you would only get 1 as 160 is the min, the only way you could get three tags would be through the leftover part of the LPP. I am in the program with 1200 acres and get two apps.

the meeting is available on you tube and this presentation/discussion took place on Sept 8 around, just prior to the 6 hr mark Most of the comments were from outfitters not wanting any change in the allocation It's hard to attend these meeting especially in September and one commissioner made a...

just callin out the bs when I see it!

bs

OTC tags need to go away, give regional or area managers the ability to set tag numbers, does not necessarily mean reductions. Tag reductions need to happen in overcrowded units. Overflow from other states after the draw and from draw units in Colorado are a big crowding issue and this would...

eliminate all OTC tags, this would help with the preference point issue, it will not cure the problem but would help. Going draw on all tags does not necessarily mean reduction in tag numbers. A lot of areas need reductions because of other states lowering non res #'s and those hunters coming to...

call the USFS Gunnison office to make sure who you are talking to is permitted to guide in the area, then check with CPW officer in the area and get his opinion. anybody can give out their brother in law in Texas' phone number as a reference. And I believe AEI is in 55 not 67

i want the hunt app

several units in that area have seen a decline in numbers of elk with antlerless tags being abundant and classified as "B" tags. Heavily hunted and not difficult access. the CPW reduced these tags in an adjacent unit in response to low numbers. Not sure if they did this in 42/421 but I do...

make the whole state a draw, allocate the tags based on herd data, raise res license fees, make antlerless lic otc with cap for residents. majority of point problem solved

spread is one for one your 32 inch spread 360 bull would have to have a 52 inch spread to get to 380 the typical 10 tines would need to add 2inches each to increase a bull from 360 to 380 tine length is the driver as length width spread can be somewhat consistent with exceptions but exceptions...

sounds like a can of worms

not intending to hijack your thread but interested in a Utah Bison hunt and am curious about you/your wife's experience. PM response is fine thank you

how were you guys successful in the reissue process, did you go to CPW office, call in, submit online? thanks

I support the restrictions and hopefully some enforcement. I don't know about the areas north of I70 but the BLM on Glade Park/Pinon Mesa is abused by ATV's it is out of control. I would look for clarification on the permitted uses as I don't think it includes outfitters.

pretty much a cookie cutter otc unit lots of hunters and there are elk not many big elk unless you go deep

there are rules in place in regards to providing a service for compensation on Federal land, both USFS and BLM. An outfitter must be permitted in a specific area to provide a service commercially. Enforcement is another story, there are very few law enforcement personnel over vast land areas...

tough photo, head looks small so could be bigger than my initial estimate would like a opposite photo 310

make all bull tags draw only end of problem also give all residents otc cow tags with quota to allow you to hunt every year