15 year old stripper

feddoc

Long Time Member
Messages
7,219


From the 1970s through the present, China has been more than happy to absorb the manufacturing that floated every small American town through the first half of the 20th century.


Worker abuse? Human rights?


Meh.


China got what it wanted—a foothold for economic growth.
 
I could not agree more and pointed out the irony of the abundance of fentanyl. China is attempting to destroy America and we go right along.

Think a green new deal is a great way to save the planet? Want to fight inequality so everyone has a chance to live a high quality life?
Let’s see which political leaders and corporations put their wokeness to work once we get over this nasty SARS coronavirus. Tens of millions of unemployed, rent-due, college plans canceled, Americans will be waiting.
Talk to an international investment fund manager today and they’re all about environmental, social and corporate responsibility. Even the World Economic Forum has made it a talking point for a good 10 years now, largely in response to the old lefty, anti-neoliberal World Social Forum that eventually fizzled out. The captains of industry and finance realized they had to rethink capitalism so the rabble wouldn’t rise up against it. They got “woke”. They all talk about diversity, equality, justice. They’re all fighting the power.
The post-pandemic period is their chance to prove their “woke” street cred.
When the dust settles, companies manufacturing in China should move portions of their manufacturing to the United States. Think of it as the New Deal from the Franklin Delano Roosevelt years post Great Depression. It put people to work building things, not just selling hotdogs and ringing people out at the new neighborhood Wal-Mart.
Instead of giving China workers jobs at NikeNKE and AppleAAPL and the local ibuprofen lab, why not bring some of that here?
They should.
Multinationals don’t have to desert China, obviously. They want to be in China, they will all tell you, not because of the lackluster labor laws, and the weak environmental regulations, but because of Chinese consumers. And the Asian consumers next door. That makes business sense.
But does a shoe company need to make shoes destined for North America in China? Does a drug maker need to make in China all the chemical compounds for over-the-counter brand name drugs sold here in large numbers? Why can’t they make that here? Is that not a national security matter at this time?
What about ventilators? Why are we dependent on importing this stuff from China?
So a pandemic starts in China, everyone now agrees we got bum information from them so the tracking models on the virus can’t give anyone a decent timeline, and now we are important medical equipment from them, happily. It’s good that private Chinese companies want to help and show solidarity. But seriously? We couldn’t do this ourselves?
Can we not have a small business in the U.S. with 10 or 20 workers making these things, or disposable personal protection equipment like hazmat suits? Why does the My Pillow guy have to start making this stuff? And General MotorsGM and TeslaTSLA? It’s a national security issue, is it not? Make it here always.
Does Apple, which advertises itself as being all about diversity and inclusion, need to make everything it sells in the U.S. in China? Does China really care about diversity and inclusion? Why this company is even in an ESG fund is beyond me. A few years ago, workers from their suppliers were literally jumping off buildings to their death.
Companies need to step up after the pandemic and get laid off workers back to work, or employed in new facilities brought home from China.
Want your green new deal? Fine, but don’t be importing wind turbines from Denmark and China (well, Denmark will soon be importing them all from China anyway). Make them in Detroit. Make them in Louisiana. Make the taxes right and don’t impose environmental rules that make China cheaper, like mandating the makers need a $2 million air cleaning machine if they want to stay in business. That’s not going to convince a company to come to the U.S.
Why are kitchen cabinets all made in China? Can’t we make some of them here? The buyers are here. Bring it home.
This week, Missouri Senator Josh Hawley put out a statement saying pretty much the same thing: that the American government, and corporations, can help rebuild the U.S. post-pandemic by bringing at least some essential businesses back home.
Short term payroll protections are nowhere near enough.
What is the Treasury Department going to do for the Irish pub head chef in Manhattan making $6,500 a month with a $2,000 a month mortgage? Pay him his full salary for as long as the lockdown is in place?
We know Americans don’t have enough in savings to cover emergencies like this. As it stands, this is literally an emergency without a clear end-game. President Trump said quarantine measures might end in 30-days if the country is successful at smashing the curve of infections this month. It may go until Memorial Day weekend.
CNBC host Jim Cramer says we are all in this together. What about after the pandemic? That’s going to matter.
Getting people back to work may not be as easy as flipping on a light switch. The longer this lasts, the dimmer the bulb when that switch gets flipped.
“You might be looking at 15% unemployment for a long time,” says Jason Furman, former chair of the Council of Economic Advisors under President Barack Obama.
To put the pandemic time frame into perspective, the original SARS lasted 8 months. If this lasted as long, the U.S. will be dealing with COVID-19 patients until November.
“Payroll protections should be coupled with additional measures to bring critical supply chains back from China and overseas, to promote domestic production of all types by American workers, and to prevent Wall Street profiteering during this emergency,” says Hawley.
(Wait, is that a Republican talking?)
Firms across a wide range of industries have learned from the recent global supply chain disruptions that their operations are hostage to events far beyond their control so long as they rely on foreign countries for the production of critical inputs, he says.
Washington should create policies that reward companies that take this moment as an opportunity to invest in new domestic production facilities with federally-backed, low-interest loans, Hawley says.
Other Senators are on board, like Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton — he thinks bringing back ibuprofen labs at the very least is a national security must.
Senator Marco Rubio has been beating the drum against China since the trade war began, saying the country needs an industrial policy that creates advanced technology manufacturing jobs in the U.S., not much different than the Made in China 2025 policy.
Political influencers like Alexandria Ocasio Cortez should be on this, instead of on the identity politics beat more geared towards the campus quad. Does identity politics pay the rent, pay for food, save for retirement and education?
No, it does not.
If AOC wants to rage against the machine, she would be better served as a voice calling out corporations who are busy helping the Chinese job market recover, but not doing much to help her own constituents in New York, the hardest hit by the pandemic.
The same goes with Chuck Schumer, whose Twitter feed is loaded with anti-Trump messages and how if not for him and his party, the whole country would be a hell hole. How is this helpful?
It’s not. It’s no different than Trump complaining about Obama not storing enough N95 masks and hazmat suits somewhere. If you have to blame someone or something, blame China; not Obama. Not helpful.
Companies aren’t going to abandon China.
But it’s one thing to build in China for the sake of the Asian consumer market, another to build it there because it’s cheap and is easier to throw paint chemicals down a river. Not woke!
Essential equipment and supplies should be brought back to the U.S. in any recovery effort post-pandemic.
Judging by the millions getting laid off each week because of forced government closures of private businesses, the job market is going to need all the help it can get.
Let’s see who is serious about making that happen, and taking care of their own home turf. Let’s see where political will lies: with the lumpen masses they all profess to care so deeply about, or is their energy better spent bashing their political opponents?
My money is on the latter. It makes for better media!
If corporate America fails post-pandemic, then their messaging of “woke capitalism” will get Wall Street and big multinationals exposed. Yeah, your ESG is a fraud.
You want to play nice? Play nice.
Otherwise, people will just become increasingly angry. They will demand the kind of politics that may not be of use to free marketeers, let alone to the masses themselves who may be, begrudgingly, forced into a state dependence instead of the market for survival.
It won’t be their fault. They’ll know who to blame.

How The ‘Woke’ Capitalists Can Save America - Forbes
 
hmmm.....interesting
When I was economics classes way back when we used to study the relative buying power at the end of the great depression. I always daydreamed about the "if I only had $1000 bucks back then, I could have turned it in to a fortune" scenarios. I feel like we may be in a similar time. Imagine the demographic shift if even a small percentage of that manufacturing came back home? How about the exodus from the cities that is inevitable?

While some smart guys are going to get very wealthy, this might also be a once in a lifetime opportunity for average guys with a cigar box full of benjies.
 
And finally, some good news. Notice American manufacturing is undergoing "onshoring". Better for America in the long run.

[snip]"Global manufacturing consulting firm Kearney released its seventh annual Reshoring Index on Tuesday, showing what it called a “dramatic reversal” of a five-year trend as domestic U.S. manufacturing in 2019 commanded a significantly greater share versus 14 Asian exporters tracked in the study. Manufacturing imports from China were the hardest hit.

“People have been talking about leaving China for many years now and that is why we started this research in the first place, to find real data, to get the math right on this,” says Patrick Van den Bossche, a partner at Kearney. “What we are seeing now is that companies are taking a hard look at it. Because of the pandemic and supply chain disruptions it caused, people will be able to put a number to this and when they can present their board with a nice mathematical equation about supply risk, they’ll do it and many will see that they must diversify away from China.”

Within the existing globalization model, the question of dependence on supply chains from China for both European and U.S. companies needs to be answered.[\snip]

Japan Ditches China In Multi-Billion Dollar Coronavirus Shakeout - Forbes
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom