Your yapping makes absolutely no sense.
You talk like you have half an idea on what you’re talking about. But you don’t.
You’re the biggest loudmouth, all bark, no bite, complain complain complain that I’ve ever met concerning wildlife.
Your complaints have become so minuscule, it truly demonstrates that you’re out of ammo. You’re throwing as much sh*t at the wall in hopes that something sticks. But it doesn’t. So now you’re down to the bottom of the barrel. Now your complaint is that the website crashed.
Again.....you ain’t got nuffin......
And Chester, show me. Show anyone. Where is your proof? Not based off the fact that you’ve been here since the start of the website. Show us all your proof. Take it to the highest official you can find. If you have real proof, I’ll stand behind each and everyone of you that’s crying corruption. But until then, all of it is a bunch of, I heard it from my uncles aunts sisters wife’s dead dogs long lost canary.
You guys believe anything you WANT to believe. Regardless of anything else.
If somebody told you that the expo hid all the defibrillators because they hate everyone, you’d believe it.
People can keep trying to make this about the expo. It has nothing to do with an expo. There is nothing wrong with the expo. The problem is those tags. The how, what, where, when, why of those tags.
Keep trying to distract from the real issue by bringing it back to something that this isn't about. That's a common tactic when people don't want you to discover the real issues. "Don't look at my right hand, stay focused on my left over here!"
The expo tag contract was not done legally. That cannot be disputed. It simply can't. You can try, but that makes you look flat dumb.
? more bow tags, more muzz tags and move rifle with less tags later into October...I wish SFW would show their books that’s the only thing I ask. Do I think SFW does some good projects? yes. Do people up top need to be compensated. To do a good job yes they do. People just want to see where all the money goes. Will I apply regardless yes. Utah’s draw odds suck. Is there a better solution to the odds. Yes no early rifle elk and put more archery hunters in the field. More people will go through the system and success will be lower.
Ha! You guys are giving the SFW line now. They don’t want normal, DIY hunters killing “their” trophy bulls, so we have to find a way to prevent that from happening. This is their solution to that problem.
Oh, and ending and entire hunt in the Dutton late hunt. Can’t have state draw hunters killing those big bulls!!!
? more bow tags, more muzz tags and move rifle with less tags later into October...
Most of those hunts are guided, I believe their success rates will be just fine...But will they ever risk lower success rates on their hunts since it will only cost them money on the tags they sell?
Niller, I believe you can look up Troy proposing this last spring to the WLB...
Bingo! I’m not making this up. I watched it take place at a Wildlife Board meeting.
Again, not a conspiracy. Something that happened right out in the open, directly in front of our faces.
People can keep trying to make this about the expo. It has nothing to do with an expo. There is nothing wrong with the expo. The problem is those tags. The how, what, where, when, why of those tags.
Keep trying to distract from the real issue by bringing it back to something that this isn't about. That's a common tactic when people don't want you to discover the real issues. "Don't look at my right hand, stay focused on my left over here!"
The expo tag contract was not done legally. That cannot be disputed. It simply can't. You can try, but that makes you look flat dumb.
Vanilla, I and many other people including many that do not agree with SFW have been saying that for many many years. There is no reason what so ever to have the rifle hunt in mid September. Just because SFW is now promoting it does not mean we are all SFW fanboys.
I will actually agree with you that the expo tag contract was a fishy deal, but I personally think the DWR and the state are the ones that are in the wrong, of course SFW is going to do everything they can to keep the contract, the state is the ones that broke the rules not SFW. I am in no way a SFW fan boy, but to listen to some of the guys above they sound like they have hard evidence that they have done something wrong when in reality they just hate SFW and will do and say anything they can against them.
Personally I do not care who has the tag contract, I just want the opportunity to put in for those tags, I think RMEF should have gotten the contract, but they didn't, not much I can do about that. You guys show a way to support getting the contract away from them and I will most likely support it.
Also I think there needs to be a major overhaul of the auction tags system, and that is not just a SFW problem, as every one of the org's get those tags. Most guys like to put the expo tags and the auction tags in the same group of tags, reality is they are not the same thing at all, one group is for more well off people and guides and the other is something everyone has an equal opportunity to get as long as you can make it to the expo.
While I do not think they need to do away with the auction tags completely they do need to start slashing the numbers greatly. They sell way to many of them, and in my opinion have flooded the market. Personally I would like to see a 50%-75% reduction in auction tags.
"I’m simply pointing out that this line is SFW’s plan to keep DIY hunters from killing as many trophy elk."
Let's start a sfw conspiracy list. This is a pretty good one. Somehow sfw helps the state in their tag distribution model of less than %1 of the big game tags at a public event, that any DIY hunter can participate in, but that is part of a plan to choke out the DIY hunters????????????
That's some special crazy.
Their own words are," SFW doesn't want DIY hunters to kill elk"?????????
Make some sense.
Their own words are," SFW doesn't want DIY hunters to kill elk"?????????
Make some sense.
RMEF determined that using its funds to fight the decision would be inconsistent with it's missing statement and that it preferred to put the resources it generates from donations towards projects on the ground. Pretty classy move, even if it frustrates the hell out of me.Ok. So now we are getting somewhere.
I find it hilarious that this group that had the standing elected not to.
Hmmmm makes me wonder why? If this other group (SFW) is such a detriment to the state and it’s wildlife, and the elk foundation CHOSE not to do something about it, makes ya go hmmmm
Perhaps their suit wasn’t real great?
Perhaps they didn’t want to open up Pandora’s box for themselves?
Perhaps they don’t really care too much about Utah? I mean after all, they haven’t really done a ton in the state of Utah
Can’t be self righteous and then not do something when the opportunities presented themselves. Especially on something as slam dunk as you think it is.
Hoss I do not think it is necessary a need to do away with the late hunt on the Dutton but I am 100 percent for removing the early rifle that is currently during the rut.lowed by Greg Bird.
Troy Justensen: Troy Justensen; sportsmen, fish and wildlife. I passed out a couple of different papers
with some different proposals on them. One of which is dealing with an archery only once-in-a-lifetime
bighorn hunt for both deserts and Rockies. The other is pertaining to elk. The first thing that I want to
address is the elk. First, I would like to state that we support the Division’s recommendations with the
following exceptions. The first one that I would like to talk about is the Mount Dutton late rifle. We
know that that is part of the mega unit, and a lot of bulls tend to summer on that coming from the
Boulder, coming from the Panguitch Lake, coming from the Monroe, and due to the country they're real
susceptible to a lot of pressure on the top. So, we’d ask that we discontinue the late rifle on the Dutton
Tri. Troy ain't a hard guy to Google.
Hossblur,
That isn't targeting DIY hunters. That is harvest management that affects everyone.
Learn how to read.
You know sometimes the DWR has to tell people "no". Sometimes the elk herd needs are more important than Hossblur and Nilla's wants.
You know maybe if you weren't so greedy and had better reading skills you wouldn't be so angry.
Hoss I do not think it is necessary a need to do away with the late hunt on the Dutton but I am 100 percent for removing the early rifle that is currently during the rut.
I do not read anything in that clip from the SFW proposal to the RAC that says any thing about being against DIY hunters and for Guiding services. In fact I think the opposite because there proposal of October hunts might make it harder for guides to guarantee the largest of bulls to there clients which would impact there services. October hunts would hopefully allow more permits which would move more hunters DIY or guided through the system.
So now you are blaming the outfitters???
You don't even look at whether there is science behind getting a season removed? You don't look if there is science for removing a season late vs. early.
Somehow you get pissed, see that an outfitter backs something and suddenly its SFW's fault. And somehow the auction price of one tag does or doesn't sell for proves it??????? And somehow this all is an attack on DIY????? I wasn't aware of any DIY restrictions in the early season.
It's Monday Hossblur. Time to put the liquor back in the cabinet.
I haven’t talked to Troy in years, but no way do I think he’s trying to hurt DIY guys and only looking out for outfitters. I trust that he wants what's best for wildlife. I think he's a great guy to be working for wildlife.
Fair enough, we all have our own opinion.The whole reason he stated for wanting the rifle taken out of the rut is so they could market more 400 inch bulls. That was his statement and sentiment. Who are they marketing it to? Joe Blow rifle hunter that is now going to go buy a bow and go hunt archery all the sudden? C'mon...
I am not saying Troy is a bad person. I'm sure he's a great guy. I've never met him personally, but I've heard good things about him. In fact, even publicly, I like him way better than previous SFW presidents. All that said, I don't agree with his management strategy, or the reasons behind it.
I haven’t talked to Troy in years, but no way do I think he’s trying to hurt DIY guys and only looking out for outfitters. I trust that he wants what's best for wildlife. I think he's a great guy to be working for wildlife.
Vanilla so do you support moving the LE rifle elk hunts out of the rut or not?
The science is behind d harvest management. They are talking about changing their harvest management. There is science behind doing so. They don't grab at that just to screw some demographic.
Let me tell you something you don't get. Outfitters and guides want longer and more seasons if they think the heard can handle it. More days available to hunt is more money to be made.
In case you were wondering I got told by Wade to put in for a late season tag this draw. Gee I wonder why he didn't do what you say the outfitters do?
Vanilla so do you support moving the LE rifle elk hunts out of the rut or not?
Hoss in that post of minutes of a RAC it was also suggest to move the early rifle hunt out of the rut and later in the season, it makes no sense giving the most effective weapon the rut hunt.
Am I reading it wrong correct me if I am.
Hoss I do not disagree with most of what you say.The screen shot was. After hunting on the Wasatch this year I agree with him on it. I agree with him on moving the early rifle.
I'm pretty sure it was Jay Scott where they specifically spent time on the late Dutton and how it kills the top bulls that migrate in from other units. Then I saw Troy talk about it. Then heard it. I just posted the 2 times I could remember.
But it way an outfitter interviewing and outfitter on something that wasn't good for business.
And it probably isn't. I have no real dog in that fight other than as usual when Tri shoots off his mouth I find joy in googling the answer to show him incorrect.
I had Manti late tag years ago. I've been on that tag 4 times. Those late hunts are fun, but rut hunting is 100x funner. No secret.
They pay better too. No secret.
The demand is higher. No secret
They auction higher. No
secret
Guys that can buy them, obviously pay outfitters more. No secret
I'm not sure how guides wanting to be able to keep more big bulls alive for next year's higher paying customers is bad, or a secret.
It's just business.
They are buisnessmen.
Troy wasn't too concerned with the Cache late hunt. Fair to say because there isn't big money hunting it?
Archery during rut, the muzzy, then rifle. Archery success is lower, more bulls survive. Muzzy is lower, more bulls survive. Post rut rifle are lower, more bulls survive
So if you are worried about management, or point creep, you are anti early rifle.
If SFW(Troy) is against it. Hunters ate against it. Who is pushing it?
Dudes who makemoney a a tiny few HUGE bulls.
Vanilla so do you support moving the LE rifle elk hunts out of the rut or not?
Vanilla,
I'm not claiming to know a lot about it. I'm just claiming you don't have any proof that SFW has a anti-elk DIY motive. And Hossblur as usual has jumped in to save you but has only thrown more mud in the water.
Hoss I do not disagree with most of what you say.
But that screen shot that you included I took it a little different. Yes he was talking about the Wasatch about splitting it using Highway 40.
But then he says come up with a new hunt calendar and move the elk hunts out of the rut.
I take that as meaning all early rifle elk hunts, I might be wrong but go back and read it again.
I think if SFW said “the sun rises in the east and sets in the west” there would be some that would disagree with that...
I think if SFW said “the sun rises in the east and sets in the west” there would be some that would disagree with that...
Technically the earth rotates around. The sun don't move????