I'll buy what I want to buy that is also legal. That is part of what it means to be "free." Usually my buying is dictated by the combination of value and quality. I bought a dozen G&H decoys at the Henrietta, Oklahoma store. About $95 for dozen standard sized mallard decoys with twist heads. Not the cheapest decoys around, but I'm told maybe the best quality decoys around. They last longer, their paint remains good longer. The store claims they are the last US made decoy on the market. I would have bought Chinese decoys in an instant if they had a better reputation for quality. I have bought some Filson wool products -- again, high quality. On the other hand, I prefer to buy US military surplus wool trousers for about $20/pair than pay $160/pair for the Filson medium weight wool trousers -- here's where the value portion of my buying process comes into play. I'm not convinced the Filson $160/pair medium weight trousers really deliver substantially greater quality for hunting pants than the M51 US Military surplus wool trousers I have been able to buy at $20/pair.
It isn't patriotism, in my view, to buy an inferior US product or a non-competitive US product. We pride ourselves on being competitive and the best business people in the world. How is that promoted by buying inferior and/or non-competitive products?
Maybe we have some bad trade agreements in place with some foreign governments. Maybe, for example, our rice grown by US farmers ought to be able to compete fairly on the markets of Japan and Korea. I'm with you. Go work that problem and if you don't get satisfaction, block imports from those countries to our markets if they don't provide fair access to their markets for those of our products that are more competitive than their own. But don't ask me to unilaterally buy US, however.