Mitt WTH

I look at Trump withholding $391 million for 84 days that was earmarked to buy "sniper rifles, rocket-propelled grenades, night vision goggles, medical aid and other equipment the Ukrainian military needed to fight a grinding war against Russian-backed separatists" (per everyone's favorite NYT) and ask myself WTF.

Does a reasonable person really understand that the actual fight was over the president sticking his thumb in Congresses eye? If this the standard for impeachment, we can expect alot more than the 2 I have had the privilege of witnessing.

How about we dig around a little to see what these swampsters were buying with our $391 million.
 
If we really knew what the hell was really going on we'd be lining them up in front of a gallows, Founder thinks Trumps guilty, yet evidence points to another frame up since they classified testimony and Schiff and his staff met with the guy they didn't know..... but yet the guys in the know voted to acquit......and they're blamed for not allowing all the evidence to come out that the dems controlled in the house and protected as classified..........yes folks it's a Washington Spy thriller !!

Bluehair's got the right idea but we the people don't have access......what the real underlying crime may have been.

What's even more ironic is we've had all these investigations, and investigations on the investigations, and millions upon millions of pages of evidence and hundreds upon hundreds of witnesses and hours upon hours of testimony and TRUMPS still in the chair and will remain there cause a few folks that know most of the facts,we don't, thought he should remain. If he was guilty after all this they'd have thrown him out.......BUT.......he's still there and most likely will be until 2024 so for those of you haters... Walgreens has a sale going on for Tums and Maalox so you'd better stock up, since it's going to be a while before you feel relief without medicinal help........LOL
 
If we really knew what the hell was really going on we'd be lining them up in front of a gallows, Founder thinks Trumps guilty, yet evidence points to another frame up since they classified testimony and Schiff and his staff met with the guy they didn't know..... but yet the guys in the know voted to acquit......and they're blamed for not allowing all the evidence to come out that the dems controlled in the house and protected as classified..........yes folks it's a Washington Spy thriller !!

Bluehair's got the right idea but we the people don't have access......what the real underlying crime may have been.

What's even more ironic is we've had all these investigations, and investigations on the investigations, and millions upon millions of pages of evidence and hundreds upon hundreds of witnesses and hours upon hours of testimony and TRUMPS still in the chair and will remain there cause a few folks that know most of the facts,we don't, thought he should remain. If he was guilty after all this they'd have thrown him out.......BUT.......he's still there and most likely will be until 2024 so for those of you haters... Walgreens has a sale going on for Tums and Maalox so you'd better stock up, since it's going to be a while before you feel relief without medicinal help........LOL
The guys “ in the know” must’ve wanted Trump to be in the special group of impeached Presidents, or they would’ve shared their “know” with the world to keep him from being impeached. That seems strange, but maybe Trump wanted to be in that club. It is pretty exclusive.
 
Well founder since the dems blocked some of the testimony you need to be able to read through the lines. Why? Since they lobbied for not enough witnesses........... why did they block the one that could damage their case the most?

See it runs both ways , then why when they had the opportunity to call other witnesses didn't they do it? Yet they project the blame on the other guys when it was their job. The GOP didn't lose their case the dems did and no matter how much you want to try to twist the facts that remains.

When you don't present enough evidence in court you lose and it's never the other guys fault.......it's yours

You must take a lot of comfort in seeing him leading our nation and it must have been nice for you to watch him give the SOTU speech listing our achievements as a country . I'll bet you sat their cheering him on, along with old Nance !! You probably were as elated as she was and wanted to make some confetti too to throw in celebration like she was making when he finished. It's been a great week hasn't it and Trumps looking stronger than ever and working hard to keep America great........God love him!!!!
 
If You could Turn Trump Loose!

There'd be so many 'YOU'RE F'N FIRED's' there wouldn't be any of them left around!
 
WRONG. In asking for my vote, Mitt Romney asked me to evaluate his beliefs.

The issue with Mitt is no one knows what those are. A pro abortion Mormon?

And ask Bess how many times I pounded him for supporting the man, knowing full well Mitt Romney was 100% about Mitt Romney.

I didn't invoke his faith, HE DID. The same faith that calls him to be so moral and ethical, must be blind to buying up companies, laying off workers, destroying communities, in the name of profit? Or sucking an unborn fetus' brain out of it in the womb.

Where was Mitts moral conviction when he asked for Trumps endorsement? How about when he wanted to be Trumps Secretary of State?

I dislike Lee. He's a grandstander. But everyone knows where he stands.

What changed in trumps character, ethics, morals, in the time Romney sought endorsements and Sec of State job, to Wed?

Nothing.

Romney's #1 financial backer is Sheldon Adelsen. A CASINO MAGNANT. I though gambling was contrary to mormon beliefs? Apparently Romney's God looks the other way on morals and ethics as long as Romney benefits?


Isnt There some scripture about a rich man, tge kingdom of God, and the eye of a needle?

How mych is Romney worth?


Hey Hossy!

Ya Gotta Pick the Best of the Evils!

F'It!

I Ain't Voting Anymore!

You Happy now Hoss?
 
Trump won't have to write a book historians will write about what the Obama administration did to him and how the dem party originated the Russia Collusion Fraud on the American people. Then they'll elaborate about how Obama abused the FISA process against Americans. Then they'll probably write a few chapters on how Trump was impeached and why he was acquitted on the Dems failing to produce enough evidence for them to prevail in the senate. Then they'll elaborate about how they denied Trump due process and violated his rights when comparing just how it differed from the normal impeachment process, and why it failed.

Historians are sticklers for detail and Trump's impeachment was anything but conventional and conforming to the precedents set in prior impeachments done in the past. Dems have earned a place in history since they waged the first impeachment not allowing due process and violating his right's. Yes that's an accomplishment alright, but not one that will be reflected on in a positive manner for future generations. I'm sure it will also be a topic in law classes as an example of how the defendant's right to due process and a fair trial could be violated even in the proceedings against the highest office in the land. Then they'll point out why the verdict was acquittal and go into detail as to why. The best part is all the players names will be right there in the record to see just how a major political party in this country abused it's power and wound up having to face justice in the end as the defendant was acquitted for improper procedure and violation of the defendant's right to due process and a fair trial.
 
You guys don't see the error in your logic. The dem party screwed the pooch by initiating the only partisan impeachment in the nations history and violating his rights. He already won the fake impeachment scam! I know you two deep thinkers can't face reality but that's the way it's going down in history and law texts.........so guess the jokes on you two. You fell for the hype instead of actually understanding why the move was so dumb. If they would have done it the right way it wouldn't have backfired so badly. The radical left pushed them into it and brace yourselves it's going to be ugly. Watch what unfolds in the next few months prior to the election and then watch how the party gets hurt for the bad actions of a few. So which socialist are you 2 liberal supporters going to vote for? OOPS the dems aren't running socialists are they? Some things you just can't make up isn't reality a beotch.......LOL
 
You guys don't see the error in your logic. The dem party screwed the pooch by initiating the only partisan impeachment in the nations history and violating his rights. He already won the fake impeachment scam! I know you two deep thinkers can't face reality but that's the way it's going down in history and law texts.........so guess the jokes on you two. You fell for the hype instead of actually understanding why the move was so dumb. If they would have done it the right way it wouldn't have backfired so badly. The radical left pushed them into it and brace yourselves it's going to be ugly. Watch what unfolds in the next few months prior to the election and then watch how the party gets hurt for the bad actions of a few. So which socialist are you 2 liberal supporters going to vote for? OOPS the dems aren't running socialists are they? Some things you just can't make up isn't reality a beotch.......LOL
So anyone who thinks Trump is nasty and a liar must be a socialist supporter? It's impossible to dislike Trump without being a liberal?Funny, but that's what Trump thinks too, so you're a good follower.
 
Really I'm more concerned about you not being upset they violated his rights. When they take that away from US then we're not too different than a banana republic. I couldn't care less if you hate Trump that's your right but when you support an illegal impeachment then you seem to have been supporting the overthrow of our system. Can you see the difference now? When they start violating rights what's next ? Are you for that too?
 
Really I'm more concerned about you not being upset they violated his rights. When they take that away from US then we're not too different than a banana republic. I couldn't care less if you hate Trump that's your right but when you support an illegal impeachment then you seem to have been supporting the overthrow of our system. Can you see the difference now? When they start violating rights what's next ? Are you for that too?

A "banana republic" is a country that relies solely on one crop for it's economy... it has absolutely nothing to do with anybody's "rights." Yet you repeat it like it's true, it's not even close to accurate. You know not of what you speak. But, of course, you think that a President has "rights" in an impeachment. They don't. You guys have also posted fake fascist symbols attributed to Italy as if it's a clue from the Speaker of the House. Fake recollections of Buttigieg stories on abortion. People claiming subpoena powers require a full vote of the House, they don't. People claiming impeachment trials warrant Due Process and the presumption of innocence. They don't. Fox admitting they run "disinformation" regarding Ukraine as people die on a hill defending Fix News (misspelling intended). And countless other provably false claims, yet they keep getting repeated without forethought or depth and breadth of knowledge.

And now we know why our country is in the mess it's in today!

The bottom line is your guy had two years to do whatever he wanted and totally squandered it! Completely useless! Ran up the debt! Solved nothing! And you worship at His feet like a God. What a sad commentary on the Republican Party today!
 
Boy! Talk about beating around the bush and not answering the question about supporting what appears to be a impeachment coup. Grizzly you are no better then the liberal lying press and it is obvious that you support the social liberals even when you say you do not.
You are in the same class as Adam Schiff and Pelosi as far as I am concerned and I doubt I will change that opinion.
RELH
 
Again. Why the hurry? Bolton didn't write a book in a day. Why didn't the house subpoena him? Why not Parnas?

The had an impeachment trial in a secure room, no presidential witnesses, a sympathetic press banging the dum 99% for impeachment.

Yet, they HAD to get it done before New Years.

WHY?

They could have slow walked this all spring pulling in every Christine Blassey Ford they could find.

Bolton
Parkas
Rudy

Why did they run through it?

Only 2 reasons I see.

1. Shiff knows damn well putting Bolton on a stand means Bolton talks. And regardless of where you are on Trump, US tax payers are missing $1.8 billion, the IMF another $7billion. Bolton knows where that went, and for what.

Shiff is a clown, but he ain't opening that can of worms.

2. Pelosi explained to him under NO CIRCUMSTANCES would the impeachment enter an election year. She didn't want it to start with. She knew they had nothing. She knew what it would do for Trump politically.

Bolton didn't resign. He didn't quit. If the President committed crimes, why didn't Bolton resign and expose it?

He's a jilted lover.
 
Again. Why the hurry? Bolton didn't write a book in a day. Why didn't the house subpoena him? Why not Parnas?

The had an impeachment trial in a secure room, no presidential witnesses, a sympathetic press banging the dum 99% for impeachment.

Yet, they HAD to get it done before New Years.

WHY?

They could have slow walked this all spring pulling in every Christine Blassey Ford they could find.

Bolton
Parkas
Rudy

Why did they run through it?

Only 2 reasons I see.

1. Shiff knows damn well putting Bolton on a stand means Bolton talks. And regardless of where you are on Trump, US tax payers are missing $1.8 billion, the IMF another $7billion. Bolton knows where that went, and for what.

Shiff is a clown, but he ain't opening that can of worms.

2. Pelosi explained to him under NO CIRCUMSTANCES would the impeachment enter an election year. She didn't want it to start with. She knew they had nothing. She knew what it would do for Trump politically.

Bolton didn't resign. He didn't quit. If the President committed crimes, why didn't Bolton resign and expose it?

He's a jilted lover.


Seriously Hoss, you should be under concussion protocol after your last couple posts!
 
A "banana republic" is a country that relies solely on one crop for it's economy... it has absolutely nothing to do with anybody's "rights." Yet you repeat it like it's true, it's not even close to accurate. You know not of what you speak. But, of course, you think that a President has "rights" in an impeachment. They don't. You guys have also posted fake fascist symbols attributed to Italy as if it's a clue from the Speaker of the House. Fake recollections of Buttigieg stories on abortion. People claiming subpoena powers require a full vote of the House, they don't. People claiming impeachment trials warrant Due Process and the presumption of innocence. They don't. Fox admitting they run "disinformation" regarding Ukraine as people die on a hill defending Fix News (misspelling intended). And countless other provably false claims, yet they keep getting repeated without forethought or depth and breadth of knowledge.

And now we know why our country is in the mess it's in today!

The bottom line is your guy had two years to do whatever he wanted and totally squandered it! Completely useless! Ran up the debt! Solved nothing! And you worship at His feet like a God. What a sad commentary on the Republican Party today!

GRIZZ,

Well when you're not smart enough to know why the term banana republic was used what can I say.........LOL

Hows that rino meaning working our for you?

The reason this country's in such a mess is because your party is working overtime going around existing laws, using divisional politics against folks, and launching fraudulent Russia Collusion Investigations under the guise of being legitimate. Then they moved to launch the first partisan BOGUS impeachment in our nations history to try to discredit him further. How can any nation function when one party uses the media 24/7 to promote FAKE NEWS against a newly elected president and then furnish the propaganda to continue non stop over a three year period. How many of the bombshells your party furnished never materialized? Why are they so aligned against the president to couple their talking points with the dems rhetoric of destruction. You only have to look inward to comprehend the false troubles one party keeps perpetuating to try to gain political advantage.

More of our troubles have come from their disrespect to our existing laws and passing state laws that directly defy existing federal law. Why would any city or state pass laws that hamper our law enforcement agencies from doing their job to protect the people? Why would any party pass sanctuary laws to harbor illegal aliens that defy federal laws and impose the burden of support on the American people?

Why would any party choose to allow an individual who's not a citizen of this country be given the right to vote? What justification could they possible use to give them an equal voice to an American citizen? Where are those right's justified in our constitution? Why is it one party has broken our federal laws knowingly violating the oath they took to protect and defend our nation? Don't our elected officials who are paid by the people have a duty to support and defend our nation since their oath of office committed them to doing so.

Which brings us to all the rhetoric about how Trumps hurting our nation. Why don't you tell all of us just which right's and laws Trumps violated that hurt you? Tell us which laws he passed that have hurt you? Tell us which unlawful acts he did that damaged you? Then explain to us how you're worse off than before he was elected? Give us some reasons that show how his presidency has damaged you?

See the dems keep telling you all the things he's done to hurt you and show us what he's done to support their rhetoric. It's very important for you to show us because that's what you've been told and seem to believe. See the dems always use rhetoric to imply he's damaged you yet the countries doing better than ever. Since Trump's such a evil demon you should be able to show us how he's damaged you, because frankly most of us haven't seen let alone felt it.

The reason the dems use rhetoric about hurting folks is because they rely on your sense of compassion for the other guy to feel compelled to buy the argument. Yet most folks when asked directly can't come up with much.......HMMMM

Show us the examples where Trumps used racial comments against the people of this nation? Show us where Trumps made your kids feel ashamed of their skin color, since we all know they're evil.

Show us where Trumps used divisional politics to incite hatred among different races within our country. Show us where he's passed legislation to discriminate against American's on skin color or race? Quite the contrary he's got employment numbers benefiting all races across the spectrum. Would a racist do that? Show us where he's discriminated against women? How has he discriminated against the unborn when he's championed prolife.

So which socialist are you going to vote for?

Since you oppose Trump socialism is your only option in the election. Think Bloomberg the racist and anti gun guy is going to save you? Hell he's poured millions into defeating GOP AG in states where they're on the ballot, so they can use the states to enact laws against our constitution. He's the old stop and frisk guy and you won't be carrying any protection around if he has his way. Think it's a coincidence he
is using his money to influence elections in many states?

Since the majority of your candidates said publicly they wouldn't be opposed if your party selected a socialist to run for president, Your options seem limited. Given your party elected a socialist to head up the DNC Tom Perez what have they planned for you. This isn't your grandpa's democratic party that worked for the people. No this is the new democratic party that's home to the socialist movement, committing fraud, rigging the ballot, false rhetoric, division and subverting the constitution to get in power to control this country by any means possible.

The most important fact you haven't realized yet is it's not about you, since you really don't matter. It's about being able to make you think the other guy is going to ruin this country and violate your right's,. When in reality they're the party that's been doing exactly that since the first day he got in office.

See the reality is, he's the threat to them gaining control of this nation, you're just a pawn they've been lying to they need to pull that lever, to give them the power to transform our country........What you've shown us is you're buying the rhetoric instead of seeing the bigger picture, and that's exactly what they want you to see. Blaming the other guy for our lives is much easier than seeing that guy in a mirror who really had a bigger effect in the outcome. Yep Trump's done it all to them..........LOL
 
Last edited:
Seriously Hoss, you should be under concussion protocol after your last couple posts!



I Don't have an R next to my name. Gives you freedom to not follow the team script.

Let's you look at an issue without having to defend anyone.

Schiff is a documented liar, and leaker. Not a stretch to point it out.

Romney is my Senator. We know what he's about as well.
 
Sen. Mitt Romney, a Utah Republican, is uninvited from this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC, after the chairman of that conference says he fears for the senator’s safety.

The announcement comes after Romney broke ranks with his fellow Republicans, becoming the only senator in U.S. history to vote to convict a president of their own party.

Chairman Matt Schlapp told Greta Van Susteren’s “Full Court Press” that Romney shouldn’t come to the conference this month.


I would be happy to walk along side of him going in to the CPAC or any where else.
Only guy to vote in what he believed and not along party lines.
 
Funny how Romney and Bolton have become liberal hero's.

A month ago they were war mongers, racists, sexists, etc, etc, etc.

Always good to have folks with such string convictions now preach about moral convictions.


Also interesting how both of them had such moral convictions they lobbied for sec of State, and worked for Trump.

Those morals sure come to the forefront when the Trumpeter doesn't love tgem anymore
 
Sen. Mitt Romney, a Utah Republican, is uninvited from this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC, after the chairman of that conference says he fears for the senator’s safety.

Is that real? What kind of dirtbags typically attend CPAC that a former Presidential nominee and sitting Senator is in physical danger?

They probably should cancel that whole event if anybody that doesn't toe the party line needs to fear for their own safety!
 
you're so gullible....lol

We know you've bragged about never missing the opportunity to be a jerk. You did it right here on MM. But I would think you'd get tired of being so wrong all the time.

Screenshot_20200211-215550_Samsung Internet.jpg


Screenshot_20200211-215900_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
Last edited:
Has there ever been a more DICTATORIAL group in America than one that merely being near after a civil disagreement results in fear of your physical safety... and this coming directly from the Chairman of that group?

TERRIFYING THAT THESE TYPES OF PEOPLE EVEN EXIST!!!
 
The new Wizard of Smarts arguing just to argue. It happens when his TDS enters his frontal lobe.
 
I'm sure CPAC not wanting Mitt there is more than a few banana's over your head!

Funny how the guy that supports the dems strict party loyalty and lock step voting would want to reward a defector in the ranks...... This wouldn't have anything to do with him being a rino would it?

Grizz, did we foil your feeble attempt at totalitarian Alinski logic.......when they vote for us they're wrong but when they vote for you they're good loyal, prayerful comrades........
 
Suspect in congressional shooting was Bernie Sanders supporter, strongly anti-Trump
By Jose Pagliery, CNN Investigates
Updated 5:20 PM EDT, Thu June 15, 2017

Again, just me sitting here looking at the world as it is vs how some want to convince people it is.

Mitt shouldn't be at CPAC. Not for saftey but because he doesn't want to be conservative.

Kinda like a socialist should be the DEMOCRAT nominee.

But, beating the Orange man at all costs right?

Or wanting to be in the majority, but ashamed of conservatives somehow makes you moral?
 
Hoss, you can't really think that's an apropos comparison! Plus, when you put an idea like that in the head of a LIV, they jump all over it like a Banana Republican (right Boskee!)

Who's the Chairman of Antifa? When is their next Conference and where does one buy tickets? And which national and world leaders will be attending and speaking?

PS. Boskee, your claim there that I support Dem party loyalty is one of the most dishonest claims I've seen here, and that says a lot coming from the TDSers. I've said to investigate and imprison Holder, Hillary, and Bidens a dozen times. You spewing that crap about an individual when it's so provably wrong is embarrassing to the other post you've made, and that also says a lot. You should be ashamed.
 
Hoss, you can't really think that's an apropos comparison! Plus, when you put an idea like that in the head of a LIV, they jump all over it like a Banana Republican (right Boskee!)

Who's the Chairman of Antifa? When is their next Conference and where does one buy tickets? And which national and world leaders will be attending and speaking?

PS. Boskee, your claim there that I support Dem party loyalty is one of the most dishonest claims I've seen here, and that says a lot coming from the TDSers. I've said to investigate and imprison Holder, Hillary, and Bidens a dozen times. You spewing that crap about an individual when it's so provably wrong is embarrassing to the other post you've made, and that also says a lot. You should be ashamed.


My friend, when you show me a Trump supporter try to take out a large swath of the Dems in the house, it would be even. Not talk, actually start shooting.

Leader of Antifa? George Soros via his Open Society initiative. Black masks cost money.

Again. When the left points out the Bundy's or the militias being right wing, you wouldn't see me trying to pretend otherwise.

I grew up on construction sites and in sports. Rough talk, big egos, etc, are just that. Steve Scalise didn't get his guts spread all over a baseball field by mean words. You own guns, you shoot stiff, it's beneath you to conflate words and bullets.

Wear a MAGA hat to Portland. Dare you.
 
CUB, Push yourself back from the keyboard and look at what you post......especially lately.......your posts don't lie, it's a reflection into your little mind........and your political preference. You disarmed your own argument once again...........
I'm not ashamed of anything I post because it's based in reality and I have the education & life experience to back it up.

You're a victim of your own little internet search engine dependence in that you lack the ability to be able to distinguish between the wheat and the chaff and that's a fact you can't over come.......if you think the guys on here can't see thru that you're only kidding yourself. That's precisely why you get sucked in on fake news.

If you want to reflect on the guy that's having trouble keeping up he's staring you right in the face every morning in that mirror.
 
Hoss, I never once defended Antifa nor specified their ideology. I merely said they're not an organized group with a Chairman, conventions with national prominence, ticket sales, etc...

They're a dangerous ideology, but they're not an organized group like CPAC (which I would not say is a dangerous ideology, by the way. The risk of violence came from their Chairman, not me). Antifa is more like Proud Boys or another loosely formed coalition, not an actual group.

Heck, I can just about guarantee CPAC has an EIN and Articles of Incorporation... I'm pretty sure Antifa does not.
 
Because Antifa doesn't have an EIN doesn't mean they don't have a charter. I get your point that its probably not on file with sec of state though - being anarchists and all.
 
Boskee pulls off another Banana Republic-esque claim while invoking Alinsky during posts calling somebody a comrade and "cub" ???

Alinsky rule - "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon."

You're actually practicing Alinsky's "most powerful weapon" while calling people Alinsky. It's you who needs to look in the mirror, my friend.
 
Because Antifa doesn't have an EIN doesn't mean they don't have a charter. I get your point that its probably not on file with sec of state though - being anarchists and all.

Exactly, it's a group of losers who are angry at the world and want to inflict damage. It's a thought, not an organized group. Just like white supremacy is a thought and Nazis are a group.

For some reason, people think because I don't consider them an organized group I support them? That has NEVER come out of my mouth. EVER!

Even hoss, who is typically a deeper thinker than that, jumped to that conclusion. There's no basis or justification for it.
 
Go read your posts.......the problem with the internet is what you're trying to say isn't what comes out......Besides when your texting in a rage you have trouble wiping the banana off your face. When you keep calling folks out when you don't even know what the hell the term implies it only makes you look ignorant,,,,,,,,and then when you try to imply they're wrong it reflects poorly on you not them can you comprehend that. Then when you imply they're idiots and you're the one lacking the knowledge it reinforces the fact......you're the idiot.
I can't make it any clearer than that.

You're accusation's about CPAC only show how ignorant you are about what it's purpose is. So if you don't like being called a liberal stop acting like one. Take this in the manner it's intended or not it's your choice. I know how to exploit Alinski every bit as well as any liberal on earth and can use it against them the same way they use it against us......come to think of it that's another thing I have in common with Donald Trump!
 
Exactly, it's a group of losers who are angry at the world and want to inflict damage. It's a thought, not an organized group. Just like white supremacy is a thought and Nazis are a group.

For some reason, people think because I don't consider them an organized group I support them? That has NEVER come out of my mouth. EVER!

Even hoss, who is typically a deeper thinker than that, jumped to that conclusion. There's no basis or justification for it.


I didn't jump to any conclusion. You not knowing where Antifa came from and who finacially supports them is on you. It's not deep conspiracy, it's pretty open.

But AGAIN, you claim something not true.

Take 30 sec. Google Ben Shapiro. Then add death threats, security, college campus.

I drove past a giant Bill board in Kaysville with a Giant "thank you" and a pic of Mitt Romney.

It will be there as long as the bill is paid for. Not vandals. No nothing.

Now where that MAGA hat to Portland. San Fran, LA, NY, Austin, hell wear it yo Park City.

"We cant guarantee his safety", and "9-1-1, there is a shooter, shooting up the house republican softball practice", TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.

I trust you knowledge, but every lawyer I know has a blind spot. Because their world is words and laws, they don't understand a world where those things don't matter.

No one cares if you have a corporate leadership structure and articles of incorporation when bullets start flying.

And yeah, the proud boys would be right wing. Doesnt matter who is in a management position.
 
Go read your posts.......the problem with the internet is what you're trying to say isn't what comes out......

You're accusation's about CPAC only show how ignorant you are about what it's purpose is.

I know how to exploit Alinski every bit as well as any liberal on earth and can use it against them the same way they use it against us......come to think of it that's another thing I have in common with Donald Trump!

I recommend you go read my posts again. I said a specific thing and you guys ASSUME something else came out. I said Antifa wasn't an organized group and you ASSUMED that I meant I supported them. In reality I said they were losers that wanted to inflict damage.

I never made accusations about CPAC, in fact I said they weren't a dangerous ideology, it was their Chairman that said he was worried about Romney's safety.

I've called for the investigation of Dems dozens of times, yet you guys continue to accuse me of ignoring their corruption.

I'm glad you understand that Trump is the living expert at Alinsky's Rules For Radicals. That's some refreshing honesty.

I do, however, understand why it's so frustrating to you to see somebody who can speak intelligently and eloquently from a perspective of success in a way you can't argue against. Nobody is forcing you to take it so personally. I don't.
 
I didn't jump to any conclusion. You not knowing where Antifa came from and who finacially supports them is on you. It's not deep conspiracy, it's pretty open.

But AGAIN, you claim something not true.

Take 30 sec. Google Ben Shapiro. Then add death threats, security, college campus.

I drove past a giant Bill board in Kaysville with a Giant "thank you" and a pic of Mitt Romney.

It will be there as long as the bill is paid for. Not vandals. No nothing.

Now where that MAGA hat to Portland. San Fran, LA, NY, Austin, hell wear it yo Park City.

"We cant guarantee his safety", and "9-1-1, there is a shooter, shooting up the house republican softball practice", TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.

I trust you knowledge, but every lawyer I know has a blind spot. Because their world is words and laws, they don't understand a world where those things don't matter.

No one cares if you have a corporate leadership structure and articles of incorporation when bullets start flying.

And yeah, the proud boys would be right wing. Doesnt matter who is in a management position.

Who said they didn't know where Antifa support came from? That doesn't make them an organized group. They're a Facebook page and an ideology. Romney would likely be in danger speaking to them too. Is your argument that they're akin to CPAC? I wouldn't put them in the same sentence, I don't think you should either.
 
No. You said they have no leadership. You are incorrect.

CPAC owes Mitt Romney nothing. Despite him being a east coast liberal governor who was pro choice, and anti 2A, CPAC didn't destroy him based on their "morals"

As a thank you, Romney went after, and continues to go after the Conservative President.

Par for course for Romney.

As long as it's for Romney, about Romney, advance a Romney, he will say, do, vote, audition for sec of State job.

When it's about realizing who his friends are, who has promoted him, or advanced him, Romney is suddenly Captain Moral.

His morals of say anything , do anything don't align with CPAC.

Hes a big boy with a big mouth.

In The real world their are consequences to both. I doubt Romney alerted CPAC about his "morals". They owe him nothing. And nicely, they alerted him to such.

Should we watch the footage of the CPAC convention, and tgen compare it to the protesters outside and contrast who needs protection from whom?
 
Antifa, It's not just an ideology, It's an ideology with paychecks!!! Paychecks have to support a higher source, funding some of the participants, and that supports leadership & organization since they're being paid to do something like disrupt the Trump supporters.......SEE once again you get Trumped because you didn't know that..... OR TRIED TO HIDE IT.....LOL

:cry: that's OK, look at the bright side BERNIE won!! That should turn that frown upside down!!!
 
I think Schlapp was just poking fun at all of those collage administrators that disinvite conservative speakers for safety and security reasons.
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom