I really doubt any of the states with points will ever go back to random draw. The $$ states get from points is too good. I'm still concerned that NM or Idaho could end up with a point system but fortunately more and more hunters have become aware of how a point system is bad for them and there is strong opposition to point systems in both states.
The more likely scenario is that states will change the rules to attract hunters to apply in their state. Arizona did this about 5 years ago. It use to be that the 10% nonresident quota was often reached in the bonus point pass of the draw so you couldn't draw most areas unless you had enough points. Now only 50% of the AZ nonresident tags will go to the applicants with the most points and the other 50% of the tags can be drawn by someone with zero points.
One of the big downfalls to point systems is that you invest significant time and $$ to build points and then the rules are changed. Many of the high point holders were upset with the changes AZ implemented 5 years ago.
There are still many hunters out there that think point systems are good for them. I would ask any hunter that likes a point system to seriously question if point systems are really in their best interest. It is really simple math. Point systems encourage more applications every year than random draw. More applicants for a limited number of tags results in decreased draw odds. The extra $$ from extra applicants is good for the state game departments but not good for hunters. Being able to predict when you will draw a tag is the only benefit point systems provide hunters.
With all that said, I still play the point game in Arizona, Colorado, Utah, Nevada, Wyoming and Montana this year. If you want to hunt these states, you have to play the game. My only tag so far this year is in New Mexico that has no point system. I've been able to draw a deer tag in NM for 6 straight years. If there was a point system in NM, I could guarantee you that I wouldn't have drawn as many tags.
I could feel all warm and fuzzy that I've built up a bunch of sheep points in NM over the years. The truth is points won't statistically help you draw the most coveted tags each state offers unless your health outlast others in your same point group. I actually feel like I have a better chance at getting a NM bighorn tag in the next 30 years than an Arizona bighorn tag. If my physical health holds up until I'm 95 and I continue to apply in AZ, then I have a decent chance at a bighorn tag there but I would rather have a small chance at a bighorn tag while I'm young and I'm physically able to enjoy the hunt. Just like Socialism, point systems seem like a good idea to keep things "fair" but the long term consequences of point systems and socialism are both bad.