A few follow up questions... was there any testimony on the following questions:
(1) What time was the deer initially shot?
(1A) Did anyone hear the shots? If so, was it the other hunter/guides who called in the violation?
(2) What time was Hatch's text to the friend?
(3) What time/day was the carcass recovered by the game wardens?
(3A) Did Hatch and/or Alan take the game wardens to the carcass?
(3B) Was there evidence that the carcass was moved in an attempt to be hidden?
(4) Per the state's expert, how many times was the deer shot?
(5) What time was Hatch pulled over by the game wardens?
(5A) In a previous post, you mentioned the game wardens confiscated boots and "other stuff"? What was the "other stuff"?
(5B) Was there an affidavit for search warrant or affidavit for warrantless arrest presented at trial?
(5c) Were the game wardens from UT or AZ?
(5D) Did Hatch/Alan ever take game wardens to where they claim they shot the buck in AZ?
(6) You mentioned that the friend who delivered water and food testified as a state witness (presumably under subpoena). Was there a text string with directions/coordinates to where he was to meet Hatch?
(6A) Was Hatch's truck parked in AZ or UT?
(6B) Did Alan have a vehicle on the hunt as well? If so, where was it located?
(7) What is a general summation of Alan's testimony?
(7A) Did he testify they tracked it for 3 miles? If so, how long did that take and how did they stay on the trail?
(7B) Did Alan have his phone during the hunt?
(8) In a previous post, there is a picture of the buck. Was the photo entered into evidence at trial?
(8A) If so, who testified to taking the photo - one of the defendants or a game warden?
(8B) There is some answers where you state the buck's horns and cape may have "disappeared". Did any game warden ever actually examine the horns?
(8C) Did anyone testify to the measurements of the horns or the buck's "score"?
Appreciate it! I know this is a lengthy list of questions but it may provide answers many of us on the forum are seeking. Many of the questions are "yes/no" or "AZ/UT" so hopefully you do have to spend too much time with your responses. And a previous poster said it best - there is a not a lot of solid information out there. As a juror, your perspective is invaluable. Thanks!