Tags in photos?

[chap_dog48]

Just wanted to ask what the MM community thinks about this hotly discussed debate from another forum about having your tag on the animal when taking the photos. DFG as made statements that non-tagged animals could not go into state publications unless the tag was visible, something about promoting some illegal taken game possible making it into the publications. What do all you think.

Kurt-www.shootitimages.com

 

[YukonDall]

I LIKE TAKING A PIC OF JUST THE ANIMALS BEAUTY, THE TAG IS NOT PART OF THAT BEAUTY....TAG STAYS OFF......YD.

 

[AWHOLELOTTABULL]

+1 YD.

It's always an adventure!!!
www.awholelottabull.com

 

[BuckSnort]

+2

Plus it gives a few select MM crybabies something to ##### about..

Disclaimer:
The poster does not take any responsibility for any hurt or bad feelings. Reading threads poses inherent risks. The poster would like to remind readers to make sure they have a functional sense of humor before they visit any discussion board.

 

[D13er]

what's a tag??


great post/pic, thanks for sharing

JB

 

[WapitiBob]

Tag could be anywhere on that animal. Tell the F&G to pound sand.

 

[nochawk]

here I thought we were reserecting the Cabela's TAGs program again for AZ hunts... BUMMER

 

[eelgrass]

Here is a photo of our very own Tag.

Oh wait, that's Tageater, my bad.

I only put the tag on the very last buck I kill that year.

Eel

 

[Muleymemories]

Not a issue, will not see my tag in the pic!! TACKY....

 

[tageater]

I wish i had that much hair!!!

"feel free to paste my face into any of your hunting pics"