>
>> Seems to me they're
>>missing out on alot of
>>revenue. Maybe I'm missing something.
>> Any thoughts?
>
>Wait, I thought we were suppose
>to complain about G&F departments
>only caring about money.
>Now we are suppose to
>advocate for them to think
>more about money. It
>so hard to keep up
>with what we are suppose
>to complain about. Imagine
>if you worked for the
>G&F?
>
>No matter how you divide those
>NR gen tags up, archery,
>muzzleloader, rifle or all three
>combined you are still only
>going to have around 4500
>NR gen licenses in any
>given year. With the
>7250 quota then the issuance
>of about 2750 full price
>LQ tags you end up
>with 4500 NR gen tags.
> If you want to
>carve up 1/3 to archery,
>1/3 to muzzy and 1/3
>to rifle you still only
>get 4500 total tags.
>No revenue is being lost
>on the current system of
>letting people hunt archery and
>rifle under the same tag.
> You segregate archery only
>tags and your odds of
>drawing will not increase.
>Same number of tags no
>matter how the animal is
>to be killed.
>
>For the life of me I
>cannot see why people want
>to tinker with the current
>way Wyo is managing it's
>elk hunting. By every
>measure it is a success.
> No other state has
>the combination of opportunity, trophy
>quality, access, hunter density, B:C
>ratio and overall quality of
>experience that Wyo does.
>There is a reason why
>more and more people want
>to come to Wyoming to
>hunt elk. There is
>a reason why Wyo can
>charge $1,268 for a NR
>Gen license and have demand
>exceed supply. Wyo elk
>is a success by every
>measure. Why tinker with
>what has worked so well?
>
??
Very well said!!