RELH
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 17,480
I wonder if dude will scream if Trump does veto the upcoming farm bill. On one hand Dude complains that Trump does not do enough to lower the budget, but will he go against the budget over his farm bill handouts.
RELH
____________________________________________________________
White House
?
Trump expected to threaten farm bill veto if food stamp work requirements not tightened
Adam Shaw By Adam Shaw | Fox News
The farm bill
Much of the money from the farm bill goes towards subsidizing giant agriculture companies at the expense of small American farmers.
President Trump is expected to tell senior lawmakers that he'll veto the farm bill working its way through Congress if it doesn't include tighter work requirements for people on food stamps, a source familiar with the discussions told Fox News.
Legislation that passed the House Agriculture Committee last month would already tighten existing work requirements for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), while expanding funding for state training programs.
The House bill would require all ?work-capable adults? between 18 and 59 to work or participate in work training for 20 hours per week, meaning a greater number of people would have to work or enroll in work training.
According to a committee fact sheet, seniors, disabled people, those caring for children under 6 and pregnant women would be exempt.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Pat Roberts, R-Kan., said the changes in the Senate bill would not be as far-reaching as those in the House bill.
?If you don't get 60 votes, this whole conversation is moot,? he said. The Senate version of the bill has not yet been released.
A Senate committee aide said ahead of the meeting that reports of a veto threat were just rumors. The aide told Fox News that the Senate version of the bill would not contain "revolutionary reforms" to programs, but that it was premature to say what exactly would be included.
House Agriculture Chairman Mike Conaway, R-Texas, told Fox News that he accepted that the bill in the House may change.
?I'm not arrogant or naive enough to believe that what passes the House is what will go to the president's desk, but I am hopeful to have that conversation with the Senate in the context of the conference committee,? he said.
Trump was scheduled to meet with Conaway and Roberts Thursday afternoon at the White House.
White House Director of Legislative Affairs Marc Short downplayed the possibility of a veto.
Work requirements are "a priority and it is something he'll be encouraging, but veto threats ? way too early,? Short said Wednesday, according to The Journal.
Democrats had objected furiously to the SNAP reforms in the House bill, claiming it could throw as many as two million people off the program and create bulky bureaucracies to keep up with extensive rule keeping, while not providing enough money for job training.
"This legislation would create giant, untested bureaucracies at the state level. It cuts more than $9 billion in benefits and rolls those savings into state slush funds where they can use the money to operate other aspects of SNAP," said Rep. Collin Peterson, D-Minn., the top Democrat on the House committee. "Let me be clear: this bill, as currently written, kicks people off the SNAP program."
House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California said that Democrats would not support what she called a ?radical, harmful? bill.
The House bill would also renew farm safety-net programs such as subsidies for crop insurance, farm credit and land conservation. Those subsidies for farm country traditionally form the backbone of support for the measure among Republicans, while urban Democrats support food aid for the poor.
Trump has long been an advocate of tightening work requirements, and called for it during his 2016 campaign. Last month he signed an executive order aiming to harden work requirements for welfare and public assistance programs.
The order, which aims to reduce poverty ? by promoting opportunity and economic mobility,? called for agencies to strengthen work requirements and look for new ones.
?Unfortunately, many of the programs designed to help families have instead delayed economic independence, perpetuated poverty, and weakened family bonds,? the order said.
Fox News' John Roberts and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
RELH
____________________________________________________________
White House
?
Trump expected to threaten farm bill veto if food stamp work requirements not tightened
Adam Shaw By Adam Shaw | Fox News
The farm bill
Much of the money from the farm bill goes towards subsidizing giant agriculture companies at the expense of small American farmers.
President Trump is expected to tell senior lawmakers that he'll veto the farm bill working its way through Congress if it doesn't include tighter work requirements for people on food stamps, a source familiar with the discussions told Fox News.
Legislation that passed the House Agriculture Committee last month would already tighten existing work requirements for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), while expanding funding for state training programs.
The House bill would require all ?work-capable adults? between 18 and 59 to work or participate in work training for 20 hours per week, meaning a greater number of people would have to work or enroll in work training.
According to a committee fact sheet, seniors, disabled people, those caring for children under 6 and pregnant women would be exempt.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Pat Roberts, R-Kan., said the changes in the Senate bill would not be as far-reaching as those in the House bill.
?If you don't get 60 votes, this whole conversation is moot,? he said. The Senate version of the bill has not yet been released.
A Senate committee aide said ahead of the meeting that reports of a veto threat were just rumors. The aide told Fox News that the Senate version of the bill would not contain "revolutionary reforms" to programs, but that it was premature to say what exactly would be included.
House Agriculture Chairman Mike Conaway, R-Texas, told Fox News that he accepted that the bill in the House may change.
?I'm not arrogant or naive enough to believe that what passes the House is what will go to the president's desk, but I am hopeful to have that conversation with the Senate in the context of the conference committee,? he said.
Trump was scheduled to meet with Conaway and Roberts Thursday afternoon at the White House.
White House Director of Legislative Affairs Marc Short downplayed the possibility of a veto.
Work requirements are "a priority and it is something he'll be encouraging, but veto threats ? way too early,? Short said Wednesday, according to The Journal.
Democrats had objected furiously to the SNAP reforms in the House bill, claiming it could throw as many as two million people off the program and create bulky bureaucracies to keep up with extensive rule keeping, while not providing enough money for job training.
"This legislation would create giant, untested bureaucracies at the state level. It cuts more than $9 billion in benefits and rolls those savings into state slush funds where they can use the money to operate other aspects of SNAP," said Rep. Collin Peterson, D-Minn., the top Democrat on the House committee. "Let me be clear: this bill, as currently written, kicks people off the SNAP program."
House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California said that Democrats would not support what she called a ?radical, harmful? bill.
The House bill would also renew farm safety-net programs such as subsidies for crop insurance, farm credit and land conservation. Those subsidies for farm country traditionally form the backbone of support for the measure among Republicans, while urban Democrats support food aid for the poor.
Trump has long been an advocate of tightening work requirements, and called for it during his 2016 campaign. Last month he signed an executive order aiming to harden work requirements for welfare and public assistance programs.
The order, which aims to reduce poverty ? by promoting opportunity and economic mobility,? called for agencies to strengthen work requirements and look for new ones.
?Unfortunately, many of the programs designed to help families have instead delayed economic independence, perpetuated poverty, and weakened family bonds,? the order said.
Fox News' John Roberts and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
