Under the bus again

https://www.ksl.com/?sid=43144461

Damn it would be nice if just one time Peay would support those who pay his bills.

Make sure y'all run out and give him and his crew a wad of cash this weekend.

"Don Peay of Utahns for Trump, who has close ties to the Trump family, said he walked out of the meeting that was punctuated by chants including "do your job" "you work for us" and "vote him out."

"It was an angry mob of anarchists. It wasn't just Trump. They hated everything," Peay said. "The behavior at the meeting was a hundred times worse than anything ever out of Trump's mouth."



"If the DWR was just doing its job, and
wildlife and hunting were the actual focus,
none of this process would even matter.
But that is not the focus or the goal in any
of this. The current DWR regime, and
SFW were born out of wildlife declines,
and are currently operated and funded
under that paradigm. Those 200 Expo
tags would not even be worth anything if
the focus was where it was supposed to
be, and wildlife and tags were plentiful.
But under the current business model,
that is how the money and power is
generated. It is generated through the
rising "value"(monitization) of a declining
resource. A resource that is supposed to
be being beneficially managed for the
masses that own that resource, ie. US.
The problem is obvious, hedging is not a
long term sustainable strategy, and
others have to lose, for some to win. In
this case it is us, the many, and our
resources, that are being forced to lose,
because there is a minority who's power
and money is derived from our loses."

LONETREE 3/15/16

TrI baby will be first in line.

To be fair after 40 minutes I walked out too. I got the impression that "town hall meeting" was to discuss the public lands issue. The first 20 minutes was about public lands with Chaffetz pulling a page out of Tribabies play book and not answering a single question straight up. As soon as I realized the meeting went from public lands to a Trump whine fest I left, that's not why I was there. But I did get to see first hand what a weaselly slimball Chaffetz truly is and how out of touch he is with the real world regarding public land.



No estas en mexico ahora, entonces escoja tu basura chancho sucio.

See if he gets re-elected. Then you know whether he is out of touch with the real world.

LAST EDITED ON Feb-14-17 AT 09:51AM (MST)[p]It was a wine fest. Those stand and shouting were Hillary supports for the most part. I doubt any real hunter would want Hillary and her liberal friends running the Country.



Chaffetz only won by around 75% to 25%. What does that say?

>LAST EDITED ON Feb-14-17
>AT 09:51?AM (MST)
>
>It was a wine fest.
>Those stand and shouting were
>Hillary supports for the most
>part. I doubt any
>real hunter would want Hillary
>and her liberal friends running
>the Country.
>
>
>
>Chaffetz only won by around 75%
>to 25%. What does
>that say?
It's says he has no reason to listen to the people.
Better balance that out..


Justin

>Chaffetz only won by around 75%
>to 25%. What does
>that say?

To quote..."Incumbents have structural advantages over challengers during elections. The percentage of incumbents who win reelection after seeking it in the U.S. House of Representatives has been over 80% for more than 50 years, and is often over 90%."

And then figure in the Republican advantage in Utah and Congressional gerrymandering to keep SL County from having a true vote and you will see why somebody like Chaffetz is reelected and why Orrin Hatch is now the longest serving Senator in US History.

It has nothing to do with accomplishments. It has to do with protecting party structure.

Grizzly

That says with all the Utarded Lemmings, even a cockroach from TexASS could win an election in Utardia as long as they have an R next to their name.

"It was a wine fest. Those stand and shouting were Hillary supports for the most part. I doubt any real hunter would want Hillary and her liberal friends running the Country."

And the above is the exact problem and the reason we are completely doomed.

It's more important to not be a Hillary supporter than to call the thief who has told you repeatedly he intends to steal your lands out.

Paid protesters, liberals, environmental whack jobs and not his constituents are all lies this non liberal crook has sold you idiots.

Just know that once these lands are gone and hunting is changed forever at least you aren't a Hillary supporter. Bless your little Republican hearts.




"If the DWR was just doing its job, and
wildlife and hunting were the actual focus,
none of this process would even matter.
But that is not the focus or the goal in any
of this. The current DWR regime, and
SFW were born out of wildlife declines,
and are currently operated and funded
under that paradigm. Those 200 Expo
tags would not even be worth anything if
the focus was where it was supposed to
be, and wildlife and tags were plentiful.
But under the current business model,
that is how the money and power is
generated. It is generated through the
rising "value"(monitization) of a declining
resource. A resource that is supposed to
be being beneficially managed for the
masses that own that resource, ie. US.
The problem is obvious, hedging is not a
long term sustainable strategy, and
others have to lose, for some to win. In
this case it is us, the many, and our
resources, that are being forced to lose,
because there is a minority who's power
and money is derived from our loses."

LONETREE 3/15/16

Then put up a better candidate. Hillary ain't the only politician out there and he isn't the only republican. If he is so horrible and YOU speak in line with the majority of the public it should be as easy as falling off the log to get a better representative. Maybe YOU aren't the majority of hunters. I know its a wild idea but maybe you are loosing touch with what is important to "the public".

Can't argue with most of what you wrote Tri. You are correct, I am the minority. I've also been a part of a lot of this in the state and would consider myself fairly educated on the subject.

Which way you wanna go with this Tex?

Economic impact?

Environment?

Habitat?

Ranching?

Extractive industry?

Or just stick with hunting. Saddle up hoss, grab a fresh tube of that glue and let's get to it after I get done with work.






"If the DWR was just doing its job, and
wildlife and hunting were the actual focus,
none of this process would even matter.
But that is not the focus or the goal in any
of this. The current DWR regime, and
SFW were born out of wildlife declines,
and are currently operated and funded
under that paradigm. Those 200 Expo
tags would not even be worth anything if
the focus was where it was supposed to
be, and wildlife and tags were plentiful.
But under the current business model,
that is how the money and power is
generated. It is generated through the
rising "value"(monitization) of a declining
resource. A resource that is supposed to
be being beneficially managed for the
masses that own that resource, ie. US.
The problem is obvious, hedging is not a
long term sustainable strategy, and
others have to lose, for some to win. In
this case it is us, the many, and our
resources, that are being forced to lose,
because there is a minority who's power
and money is derived from our loses."

LONETREE 3/15/16