All,
I just got done clarifying the results from the division of wildlife here in Utah. I was concerned when it said that my bull was a 1 year old bull on my online harvest survey results. I called and did some clarifying. Turns out he was a little bit older.
They mentioned that for some reason if a bulls age is in the double digits, it does not show the actual age in the system, it truncates it and that is why my bull appeared to be a 1 year old on the computer. What do you think, was my bull Regressing or was this just his Genetic potential? or faulty tooth data?
Here is another look at him. As a side note, he was born the year that I started putting in for elk. Seems like he was just waiting for me to find him. I also know of at least 2 other younger bulls killed off the same unit that were younger and scored better. Kind of Funny.
I just got done clarifying the results from the division of wildlife here in Utah. I was concerned when it said that my bull was a 1 year old bull on my online harvest survey results. I called and did some clarifying. Turns out he was a little bit older.
They mentioned that for some reason if a bulls age is in the double digits, it does not show the actual age in the system, it truncates it and that is why my bull appeared to be a 1 year old on the computer. What do you think, was my bull Regressing or was this just his Genetic potential? or faulty tooth data?
Here is another look at him. As a side note, he was born the year that I started putting in for elk. Seems like he was just waiting for me to find him. I also know of at least 2 other younger bulls killed off the same unit that were younger and scored better. Kind of Funny.