LAST EDITED ON Aug-24-11 AT 12:26PM (MST)[p]brymoore---You are right on the button with your comments. The Reg. is written exactly as I thought it probably was with the exception that the second paragraph lacks the word "consecutive". Whether this is a misprint, or what the Forest Supervisor actually wanted enforced are two different things that need to be addressed with him ASAP. It's ironic that the entire summer basically went by and now with the hunting seasons starting this was written only 3 weeks ago! Anybody out in the field that is saying it's a 14 day max within a 30 day period even though the unit is removed or taken to another spot is obviously going EXACTLY the way the thing is written for undeveloped areas, rather than the real reason for making any kind of order. I'd just make sure that I had photos with the date and time on each photo showing exactly where the camp is set up. When the 14 days is up then move it a mile or two and document that again. If a ticket is written for what one of those field people says is a violation, take it to court and a sharp, make that even a dull, lawyer should get it thrown out in a heartbeat. Those goons are obviously trying to stretch the intent of the order and someone needs to get burned for it, even though the Reg. was written to stop abuses. This is just another example of Feds thinking they are God almighty!