True conservationist realize that every human activity in the woods has an impact. There is not way around it and shed hunting definitely has a significant impact. There is no denying it, the animals right now are weaker and as much as risk as they are all year. Especially the females who managed to make this far without aborting. The effects of shed hunting accumulate.
While I fully agree we should be looking at other pressures as well, including ATVs, horseback riding, mountain bikers, rock climbers, dog walkers, and more.... The first step is simply getting people to admit that human presence on the range and in the wild has n impact.
I am not sure how any of us can call ourselves conservationist if we cant handle waiting a few weeks to pick up antlers which are not going anywhere. Give the animals enough time to shift out of those vital winter areas and start moving with the green.
If hunters cant agree that there is an impact, and if we cant limit ourselves, how are we ever going to convince the other groups and other users?
I know it is not popular, but we need to start admitting that human presence on the landscape has a negative impact. Where do we draw the lines? How do we manage/mitigate that impact? How can wildlife sustain the constant pressure of man? The issues are only getting worse as we increase reliance on technology, as our tourist departments are constantly dropping local hidden gems onto the net, and as people continue the Urban exodus.
If we cant start as hunters and the supposed top conservation group in the world, how can we expect anyone else?