Rack,
Ya gotta read the entire posts brother. As ASB said, intended purpose. I already owned both scopes, I did not sell the Swarovski to obtain the Nikon. Beleive me, after several trips in the field, I judged them both a lot. It did not seem to make a whole lot of sense to have a 50mm and a 60 mm for backpacking.
Yes, the Nikon is that good. I did not have a 60mm HD model, it ws the non HD. The Nikon does have a better field of view and for backpacking, two pounds lighter is very nice for my 41 year old knees.
Is the Nikon a swaro, heavens no!
The 60 mm did have better glass, better resolution, and you get another 20x of magnification. But this thread is about COMPACT spotting scopes, a 48 oz swarovski is NOT compact.
All this said, the money pocketed from the Swaro will probably go back into a purchase of an 80 mm scope (not compact and not for backpacking). I owned the 82 mm Nikon ED and it is great glass (yes much better tha the Nikon 60 mm non hd). It is very close to the 80 mm Swarovski HD. Yes the Swarovski is better, but not $1500 better. So witht he $1800 I got from the Swaro 60 mm, I will probably purchase and 82 mm Nikon ED for $1099 at opticsplanet (they are on sale).
Lest you think I snub swaro and I did bump my head real hard, the answer is no! I own 10x EL's and 15x SLC. They are valued as much as my children. I love them and will not part with them. That said the new Nikon EDG 10's beat out anything I have ever seen. They are better than my el's. However, my els are good enough and will remain with me. I trust the swarovski warranty more tha the nikon.
Hope this helps.
Porter