E
elmer
Guest
I'm posting this in both the optics and photo section.
I currently have a Swarovski ATS 80 with a digital camera adapter for taking pictures. There are two drawbacks in my opinion: 1. The scope is big and heavy particularly for my back pack hunts. 2. The adapter is a pain to use quickly and easily so I end up not taking many pictures.
Zeiss has come out with a pretty neat alternative ? The DC4 that attaches to their Diascopes. http://www.zeiss.com/c1256bcf0020be5f/Contents-Frame/3040dd99ca4df2a0c12571f50023e832
For a 65mm, the power is fixed at 30x (not variable) and the unit itself will add a hefty 28 oz. to the setup -- those are the two biggest negatives that I can think of. Other than price (DCA is $1,900), does anyone have any opinion of either the scope or the camera?
I currently have a Swarovski ATS 80 with a digital camera adapter for taking pictures. There are two drawbacks in my opinion: 1. The scope is big and heavy particularly for my back pack hunts. 2. The adapter is a pain to use quickly and easily so I end up not taking many pictures.
Zeiss has come out with a pretty neat alternative ? The DC4 that attaches to their Diascopes. http://www.zeiss.com/c1256bcf0020be5f/Contents-Frame/3040dd99ca4df2a0c12571f50023e832
For a 65mm, the power is fixed at 30x (not variable) and the unit itself will add a hefty 28 oz. to the setup -- those are the two biggest negatives that I can think of. Other than price (DCA is $1,900), does anyone have any opinion of either the scope or the camera?