elkfromabove
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 2,109
LAST EDITED ON Dec-22-17 AT 11:20PM (MST)[p]>>
>>Edited: OR NOT! Clearly one-sided! Pro-BIG
>>Monument/National Park!
>
>I didn't catch it, but too
>bad it wasn't a better
>discussion.
>
>David Nimkin is pro-monument (and anti-Escalante
>National Park) and Sutherland is
>anti-monument... so it had a
>chance at being a relevant
>exchange.
>
>
>Grizzly
>
Matheson from Sutherland basically said now we'll be able to talk more about it. In his defense, he did say that the public already had plenty of input, and he reminded them that Utah NEVER owned that land, so we can't give it BACK to the state. Judy claimed there were 100,000 to 200,000 artifacts that needed protection in order to tell the full story of the Native Americans. There was very little discussion between the guests. They simply answered questions from the moderator when asked.
>>Edited: OR NOT! Clearly one-sided! Pro-BIG
>>Monument/National Park!
>
>I didn't catch it, but too
>bad it wasn't a better
>discussion.
>
>David Nimkin is pro-monument (and anti-Escalante
>National Park) and Sutherland is
>anti-monument... so it had a
>chance at being a relevant
>exchange.
>
>
>Grizzly
>
Matheson from Sutherland basically said now we'll be able to talk more about it. In his defense, he did say that the public already had plenty of input, and he reminded them that Utah NEVER owned that land, so we can't give it BACK to the state. Judy claimed there were 100,000 to 200,000 artifacts that needed protection in order to tell the full story of the Native Americans. There was very little discussion between the guests. They simply answered questions from the moderator when asked.
