yup. you got it. for 325k, no dice. for any amount, no dice. and you'd really be ok with 18 gov. tags? not sure our non resident friends would appreciate that, since they'd be coming out of their pool of tags. so we piss eveb more of them off, they stop coming, more lost revenue. well, we'd better up the amount of governor tags in an attempt to get a few hundred thousand more to try and offset the million we just lost. hell, thats obama math.
>let's take a look at it
>... say 3 tags for
>each (antelope, deer, elk, moose,
>goat, sheep) that is a
>total of what ... 18
>tags. What would they
>go for (obviously the Sheep,
>elk and deer would probably
>be the bigger dollar tags)
>, but lets say on
>average $20,000.00 that would be
>$360,000.00 gross, back out, guessing
>here 10% for expenses, that
>nets you $324,000.00 and I
>think this would be really
>conservative. That money could
>go a long way ...
>new server to make drawing
>results available faster just for
>the folks on MM (that
>would be a hit).
>Then maybe some winter feeding
>funds or habitat improvement funds
>or how about predator control,
>but according to you why
>even try ... right.
>
>Who says we have to do
>it the way Utah does
>it? We have a
>blank slate and could put
>any kinds of stipulations around
>these tags and the orgainziations
>that we wanted to to
>avoid some of what is
>happening elsewhere.