This is Tim Barraclough and I am the President Kiowa Hunting Service, INC. and this message is for Mr. Stomper and his Game Warden friend. Last year, the law specifically read that we only had to meet with a client twice during his hunt. The length of the meeting was up to the outfitter and agreed to by the client. The length of the meeting had to be stipulated in each and every contract that was with the hunter-client. A day before the scheduled hunt and the day after the scheduled hunt, counted in the time frame to meet with the client. I can provide a signed contract with each hunter-client, that stipulates out exactly what was provided for each and every client, also pictures of my registered guides meeting with the clients twice, as stipulated by law. It needs to be noted that this was last year's regulation and it is totally different this year and must mandate a two day guide, this was not the case prior to January 1, 2018..
By law, the regulations stated that the contract between the outfitter and the hunter-client, must stipulate the time frame that we must be with the hunt. It was a meet and greet and had to be no more that that. What an outfitter decides to do and what the outfitter provides is stipulated in the contract and it is signed by the client acknowledging the stipulations. You state some monetary number, that is not remotely what we charged for the service, so what. Those hunters knew exactly what we would provide and what the costs involved were. If they did not like either item, then go somewhere else. Any person that contracted with Kiowa, about the use of the outfitter number, was told exactly what he/she was paying for, prior to accepting any terms. if that person agreed to it, signed the contract to apply for a hunt in the outfitter pool, and then applied, has no room to complain about anything.
You come on this forum and make slanderous remarks about Kiowa Hunting, with only hearsay information or third hand information from your game warden buddy or you got it from somewhere, on a subject that leads a client to believe that we did or would do anything illegal. This could potentially lead to a lawsuit because we have zero toleration for statements that defame us, if the statements were to continue. You can also tell your "buddy" the Game Warden to come on and present these clients, his case and his information, and we will talk about it. I will meet him at any time he wants, in the Director's office, to present his case. Evidently this happened last fall and no one has contacted me except for this post The reason no one has contacted me is the game warden was wrong in his interpretation of the law, if that is where it came from. Lastly there is no law suit, no citation, no contact period because he was wrong.
I spent 26 years enforcing Game and Fish laws and I feel that I have a pretty good feel for interpreting Game and Fish regulations and statutes as to what is legal.
You made one correct statement on your forum and that was "Also do not talk ill of any outfitters on here like i just did. It really pisses off most people and you will have nothing but a lot of ticked off people at the end of the day for being whistle blowers".
I can live with whistleblowers but cannot, and will not deal with anyone that makes slanderous remarks and that includes your game warden for starting slanderous information and you for passing on misinformation.
Anyone that wants to ask me any questions, my contact information is below.
Kiowa Hunting Service
www.kiowahunting.com
[email protected]