LAST EDITED ON Feb-25-19 AT 03:06PM (MST)[p]>Well I can see your buddy
>had to bail you out.
>Yes the Saudi's are a
>problem that's been documented by
>everyone on this forum.
>
>So given the Russians have not
>been abiding by the treaty
>they signed with us what
>makes you so willing to
>want to step aside and
>think anything they do is
>in the worlds best interest?
>After all they are working
>very hard to expand
>their global foot print again.
>Since Putin is saber rattling
>and issuing threats and allied
>with the Iranians it would
>appear you're ready to throw
>in the towel.
Throw in the towel on what exactly? Are you advocating selling the Saudi's Nuclear Technology without the constraints of a 123 Agreement?
>So let me come at you
>from a different angle just
>to open a little more
>perspective.... since dude is obviously
>for the browning of America
>what makes us so sure
>that those little guys over
>there aren't the ones who've
>been pulling the strings all
>along? Don't be too sure
>about what you think is
>going on boys because they're
>working very hard to promote
>the fact more nations need
>to take in more Muslims
>as an humanitarian issue and
>we're fools if we think
>that's been an overwhelming success
>thus far....
What exactly does the above have to do with Saudi Arabia getting American nuclear power generating plants?
>Talk about a plan to expand
>your global footprint..... what better
>way to conquer than from
>within.
Global footprint of Russia to the global footprint of Muslims. Which is trying to expand and why do you believe either is ahead of us?
>Why are they refusing to assimilate
>in many of the countries
>that have taken them in?
>Why are they demanding Sharia
>law and not willing to
>conform to the countries they
>reside in. The mayor of
>London is now a Muslim
>and he's trying to change
>their laws to be more
>aligned with Muslims in their
>society. Why are there now
>parts of London, Paris and
>other cities that are off
>limits to infidels?
So the solution is Muslim assimilation into various populations around the globe is to make sure Saudi Arabia has nuclear power.
>So while some of your points
>about the Wahabi Muslims are
>valid and worth considering the
>majority of folks relocated to
>other countries that now have
>Muslim issues aren't of the
>Wahabi sect and the issues
>are increasing. I agree it's
>a complex issue but not
>one so large we can't
>deal with.
I never claimed anything of the sort. I said the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, our erstwhile ally, is exporting an extreme version of Islams through state funding of Wahhabi Madarassa's including some on American soil. I can't find an Iranian counterpart which operates freely in our country like the Saudi's do.
>Lest not we forget Russia seems
>to have an insatiable appetite
>for Uranium in just about
>any form and Obama seemed
>to think we had too
>much so he arranged for
>us to sell some of
>ours. One can only imagine
>where it wound up after
>it left here. Canada must
>be working very hard on
>expanding their nuclear programs. By
>the way how much do
>you think we got in
>revenue as a country for
>one of the rarest commodities
>on earth? I don't know
>do you guys?
How much Uranium has Russia imported from Wyoming through the Uranium One?
>So yes the issues complex and
>both countries are an issue
>but we as a nation
>have to do what's in
>our best interest... not Russia
>or Iran's and and that
>should be our main objective.
>Not all the damn misdirection
> that normally occurs around
>nuclear power. We have it,
>we use it, and when
>done right its one of
>the best forms of energy
>known to mankind,
So in your view it is better to be a vendor even if the Nuke could be used against us some day. We will be less dead from an American technology produce nuke then a Russian or Chinese technology produced nuke.
>If you're more afraid of the
>Saudi's than the Iranians then
>I can't help you two
>with that either, one's not
>threatening to kill us and
>the other two do quite
>often. If you two think
>the Russian's and the Iranians
>are going to abide by
>any agreements they make with
>anyone you're only kidding yourselves.
>Yes it's a complex issue
>and yes it needs to
>be monitored but once you
>open pandora's box on this,
>every oil rich nation will
>be lining up wanting nuclear
>power to light all those
>skyscrapers, hotels, and expansion going
>on in the desert. So
>do you get involved and
>control the issue or just
>walk away and let the
>Russians have it?.....there's really only
>one answer in this equation
>and we all know it's
>nothing to turn your back
>on.
I haven't advocated for anything other than point out that Riyadh has not shown any inclination to sign any 123 Agreement with the United States. There is little to nothing we can do to stop them from going to Russia or China except lean on them diplomatically and ask them to remember which countries came to their aid when their Neighbor threatened their oil fields.
If American Nuclear Technology is to be used then the American sellers of said Nuclear Technology should follow our laws. So far there isn't a lawful agreement to send such technology to the Kingdom.
It makes zero sense to speed up the process if the process isn't to be followed. If we want to export Nuclear Power Plants to the Saudi's then their king should give the nod to make the proper deal with us, not try to do an end run around our rules. Zero to do with fear, zero to do with Iran, zero to do with Israel, zero to do with Muslim immigrants assimilating into cultures.
Nemont
