@elks96 I wouldn't be making any assumptions at this point no matter what Rob Shaul is writing. Shaul actually favors the outfitter draw as a trade-off for 90/10. He doesn't believe it will affect residents. He is wrong on that one.
Either way, the TF is against the wall on time and they will vote on this stupid "grand compromise" in August. Only Crank and Teten spoke against the outfitter drawing and that leaves 16 other members who can vote for it. The idea these issues aren't vetted individually is ludicrous.
The TF is going to ask again for public comments on these combined issues and there will be a huge push by the outfitters to get comments in their direction. The new outfitter/landowner draw will use 50% of NR licenses. Anything is still possible with the TF and I can only pray for the future to never include this kind of mechanism on wildlife and hunting related issues again.