>
LAST EDITED ON Jun-24-17
>AT 06:05?PM (MST)
>
>"Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe has
>identified the specific law which
>Trump broke in the process.
>
>
>Professor Tribe, one of the foremost
>experts on the Constitution and
>the law, initially posted this
>first reaction after Trump admitted
>there were no tapes."
>
>?Trump?s failed bluff ?endeavored to impede
>the due administration of justice?
>in criminal violation of 18
>USC 1503.?
>
>According to the Cornell University law
>database, 18 USC 1503 is
>defined in the following manner:
>
>
> Whoever corruptly,
>or by threats or force,
>or by any threatening letter
>or communication, endeavors to influence,
>intimidate, or impede any grand
>or petit juror, or officer
>in or of any court
>of the United States, or
>officer who may be serving
>at any examination or other
>proceeding before any United States
>magistrate judge or other committing
>magistrate, in the discharge of
>his duty, or injures any
>such grand or petit juror
>in his person or property
>on account of any verdict
>or indictment assented to by
>him, or on account of
>his being or having been
>such juror, or injures any
>such officer, magistrate judge, or
>other committing magistrate in his
>person or property on account
>of the performance of his
>official duties, or corruptly or
>by threats or force, or
>by any threatening letter or
>communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes,
>or endeavors to influence, obstruct,
>or impede, the due administration
>of justice, shall be punished
>as provided in subsection (b).
>If the offense under this
>section occurs in connection with
>a trial of a criminal
>case, and the act in
>violation of this section involves
>the threat of physical force
>or physical force, the maximum
>term of imprisonment which may
>be imposed for the offense
>shall be the higher of
>that otherwise provided by law
>or the maximum term that
>could have been imposed for
>any offense charged in such
>case."
>
>
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...itz_case_that_trump_hasnt_broken_the_law.html
>
>By all means, now that I
>have laid out foundation on
>credibility, thank you for your
>contribution, do the RELH wiggle
>to get out of this.
>
>
>As I said, Trump's bluffing comments
>about the tapes are a
>violation of law and do
>conform to "Witness Intimidation" via
>an "endeavored to impede the
>due administration of justice." Not
>my opinion but the opinion
>of a credible lawyer and
>fellow Harvard legal scholar.
>
>Harvard University's Laurence Tribe says Alan
>Dershowitz is wrong.
>
>In short, me = right, again
>and you = wrong, again.
>Thanks for playing!
Hahahahahahahahahagaha!!!!!
Did you actually watch the video or look for reference to what they stated?
If you did and still think you are right, there is no hope for you.