That could be with antelope, but the question was also posed about mule deer in the area. Having lived there for over 20 years, I'm pretty sure that I have a bit more insight than driving the through the area before and after hunting season with a GPS. I'm not saying that there are no decent bucks of either species in the area. But you would be surprised to find that most of them head to private land. Get a bunch of people running around the week before, scouting and they head for the fences.
In area 53 it is unlikely to shoot a buck in the upper 70's to low 80's and finding a deer after the antelope season has started in that area can be difficult to say the least. (Those numbers are my description of decent antelope in Wyoming) Add that to the numerous roads in the area for oil/gas development and there aren't many places for animals to hide or escape. Not allowing them to reach the age class that is required to get very large.
Yeah it looks like easy pickings from the highway after season when all of the animals are migrating through that area and get hung up by the "deer" fence along the road. It makes them pretty easy to find then. Also take into account the vast area that these animals are migrating from and the narrow travel areas like mentioned above.
If you really want to find something out about the area, ask how the elk population in this area is larger than normal, using resources that have historically been used by mule deer and antelope in the winter. Thus, causing the mule deer herd decline.
Add that to the tragic winter a few years back (2007) when hundreds of mule deer and hundreds antelope starved. After that year the mule deer and antelope started to make a comeback but then game and fish opened up a deer season that included taking does in a declined mule deer population.....genius.
Now more recent precipitation is very low, (Extreme Drought according to NOAA) which didn't allow for much if any regrowth from last year?s winter range. Not to mention the lowered body condition of the animals before winter. So what you are looking at is a population that is being pressured by elk numbers with very little winter range feed and the potential for another large decline from starvation is probable if not inevitable. I really hope this doesn't happen but the potential is high.
So now knowing this, would you risk 5 points on an area that could have a huge die off? I know if I was a Non-resident that the high cost of traveling to an area that could not have many animals would make me choose a little better area. But that is my personal opinion and you can do as you wish.
Is there a better area? I'm not sure because I would not pretend to know the details of all of the areas in Wyoming.
Sorry for the rant.
PY