>I have always wondered why they
>do nonresident elk only ahead
>of everything else, including herd
>surveys and tag numbers. I
>guess it all averages out,
>but if tag numbers go
>up in a year the
>herds are good, nonresidents will
>get a lower percentage, and
>in a bad year where
>tag numbers drop, nonresidents get
>a higher percentage. And nonresidents
>get no crack at the
>leftover resident elk tags till
>the leftover draw.
***I don'tt know why any NR complains when we get such a good percentage of the overall tags in Wyoming compared to any other state. My gosh, we're down to 6% in NM, AZ has the "no more than 10% rule and that means they don't have to give us any if they don't feel like it, etc. As far as your last comment, the NRs are on an equal when it comes to leftover tags because it's first come first serve for them on 7/10 and 7/17. They could let all the residenst have their pick of those too before we get our chance---just sayin!
>Just seems strange to seperate the
>nonresident elk out. Must be
>for outfitters to get first
>crack at nonresident elk hunters
>before they apply in other
>states. Oh well, I suppose
>elk herds usually take bad
>winters better thgan deere or
>antelope.
***Elk take winters a whole lot easier than deer and antelope! How often do you hear of elk having a problem during the winter? Other than in areas where G&F has had to set up feed grounds for them, they do very well on their own most of the time. The feed grounds are only there basicly as a political solution or remedy for those areas so they can maintain an artificial number of animals that is contrary to the actual carrying capacity of the land. That then brings on other problems by concentrating wolves in those areas, increases the chances for the spread of Brucellosis, etc.