Recent content by Ballistic

Hossy Dont talk about keyboard warriors. You’re one of the kings of the keyboard (on this site) for the most posts. Hypocrite statement. And please don’t talk about those that opposed the scope removals info as fuel to prove “ your” agenda. A lot of facts were brought to the table - from...

You need to add the other 4 similar posts in - with 1 being locked. I think the other 4 had close to 2000 posts combined. Pretty heated and controversial subject.

Lif I honestly believe the late September muzzy deer hunt is on the poor side for hunt timing. The velvet is coming off the bucks and the hormones push them into the dark timber. As a dedicated hunter 4 times now -only 1 buck killed w a muzzy. The rifle hunt has been far better. For elk in...

Slam If we were to use “our” recent posts about the posted drop/wind charts for discussion/example. We hopefully can agree the 600 yard shot isn’t easy as the wind affects have to be within 1/2 mph. The future tech is here that will almost peg the effects of wind. Look at the revic...

Slam The info that you copied and used is somewhat bad info. The poster probably doesn’t understand the difference between moa and mil. An moa is 1.047” @100 yards so close enough that 4 clicks =1” A MIL is 3.6”@100 yards and 10 clicks per mil is .36” per click. The poster said the scope is...

Lumpy Good point ! A question I asked the DWR when the 3 year unlimited bull elk plan was put into place ? What about annual numbers from biologists ??? What good is a biologist and exit numbers if no one’s listening ?

1- The spin to remove scopes comes from special interest agendas period - not from the average hunter. 2- The western states alignment excuse is socialistic HOA mentality. More states in the US allow scopes than not. 3-DWR harvest data does not support scope removal. 4-The comparison of a...

The truth (facts) is a hard pill to swallow. Continue with your “knows”

You sure about that Hossy ? Are you saying no one was making whitworth reproduction inlines since 1853 ?

Hossy You even acknowledged the history of muzzleloaders on another thread and posted as such. Did you forget about your post on inlines dating back to pre 1853 ? You know the inventor of the inline…….. Waiting for you to come clean Hossycrit.

Elk If the board is reading all of these posts -then the board should “know” that folks on the tech team have been called out for BS as well as anyone that doesn’t agree with the scope removal propaganda. I’m taking about Kevin Norman (sponsored long range competitor) that represents SFW...

Ballistic AE and shooter are the best -JMO

Slam Have variable power scopes been allowed on muzzleloaders in utah since 2016? That’s not future tech -been here for 8 years almost. 1x scopes many years before. The future tech (electronics ban) great work - it really didn’t explode until recently. I will respectively and nicely ask you...

Very well said ! I believe the HAMS hunts were the previews and now the study areas like “Dutton” will set the agenda to push everything back. Rifles and bows are next with the “Dutton” study. Unlimited sales on 2nd season any bulk units will put more hunters in the field (great for $$$) but...

I am mostly in agreement with your post. Just want to add to it. Centerfire rifles are built much better today than yesterday. Example 300 Weatherby from 1944 Shoots super fast. Tolerances on the chamber design are really loose (purposely to keep the shooter that never cleans the gun safe) so...