Heard your comments. Well spoken on the topic which you were very informed on.
*Obviously, since you were not a jerk, they let you run over a little bit.
When I watched commission hearings they pointed out, "We've only received 2 comments," and then they show them....embarrassing. "We need to kill more deer." Hey meathead, this report is on quagga mussels.
Very important we comment, especially to expand hunting opportunities. So many times the department puts a study/report out and 1 or 2 ignorant-ass comments are the only ones received. Nowadays, anti's are organized and they are bucking to outlaw bear hunting and current leadership is complicit...
Comments are pretty good on this one.
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2024/04/23/wray-were-not-monitoring-campus-protests-we-dont-monitor-protests-we-do-share-intel-about-threats/
I'm not there. I hunt California and then travel out-of-state to hunt muleys. I passed on "lessers' for a couple of years and decided that tag soup tastes like sh*t, especially that high-priced out-of-state tag. I quit passin' and started slingin' and have killed my best buck to date in the last...
Except that Manhattan style. I'll eat it, but Chef Blank's is the classic chowder.
If I hadn't already eaten some bear carne asada tacos, I'd be headed to the store for a couple ingredients to make this as well. Looks great, Blankety Blank.
Well, I'd like to have fish and game biologists manage the fish and game department. Not appointed, political turds who have to cater to their appointees or just want to implement their agenda, science be damned.
According to the agenda, to commemorate the 100 year extirpation, but looking at the documents as part of the presentation--oh, they'll be pushing for reintroduction. Pages 19-20.
https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=222126&inline