It seems that I recall one of the features that go into the classification of an "assault rifle" in the infamous 1994 assualt rifle ban is a pistol grip.
I have evidently injured my wrist recently, and it is painful for me to hold a rifle vertically by the pistol grip and lower the rifle into shooting position, where my wrist is highly flexed forward (my words may not articulate the physical motion of my wrist, but do this -- at least in your mind -- with your Winchester Model 70 or similar rifle and you'll visualize the wrist flexion I'm trying to describe). While it is my hope and expectation that my wrist will heal over time -- it is improving now -- I could well imagine someone with a chronic wrist problem such as this who might NEED and REQUIRE a pistol grip in order to securely and safely hold a rifle.
So, I would argue there are legitimate reasons to want to own a rifle with a pistol grip. I don't know why a pistol grip would be considered prejudicial to the sporting character of a firearm, and yet -- provided my memory hasn't misled me -- the assault weapons ban of 1994 does in fact use a pistol grip to lean towards judging a weapon to be an assault rifle.
I have no assault rifles and have no desire to own them, but I don't see the point in banning them.
I have evidently injured my wrist recently, and it is painful for me to hold a rifle vertically by the pistol grip and lower the rifle into shooting position, where my wrist is highly flexed forward (my words may not articulate the physical motion of my wrist, but do this -- at least in your mind -- with your Winchester Model 70 or similar rifle and you'll visualize the wrist flexion I'm trying to describe). While it is my hope and expectation that my wrist will heal over time -- it is improving now -- I could well imagine someone with a chronic wrist problem such as this who might NEED and REQUIRE a pistol grip in order to securely and safely hold a rifle.
So, I would argue there are legitimate reasons to want to own a rifle with a pistol grip. I don't know why a pistol grip would be considered prejudicial to the sporting character of a firearm, and yet -- provided my memory hasn't misled me -- the assault weapons ban of 1994 does in fact use a pistol grip to lean towards judging a weapon to be an assault rifle.
I have no assault rifles and have no desire to own them, but I don't see the point in banning them.