i think it does spell it out, its just that people dont understand the word "commercial". they see that and they get up in arms about "the commercialization of hunting" and strike it down. however, like i said all it is refering to is the sale of horns and hides. i went to the last G&F meeting and got the details, and in a thread below this with the heading "arizona commissioners....help" i outlined the whole proposal in great detail. it might seem a bit confusing but to put it in its simplest terms...
uso sued az because it wasnting giving NR a chance to sell the hides and horns taken on hunts. (this violates an obscure interstate commerce law) so it would stand to reason that if we just all together outlawed the sale of hides and horns (another option they are looking at) USO wouldnt have anything to complain about?!? well, if they did that the judge might have a problem with it. so they are saying that 10% of the hunts will be "commercial" (dont be scared by that word) and open to everyone equaly. you will have the same chance as a NR BUT, the other 90% of the hunts will be "noncommercial" (the opposite of what they are NOW) and will be open ONLY TO RESIDENTS. NOW only those hunts in the 10% will be subject to the judges order. if you dont want to take someone's word for it on this website, and its NOT clearly stated on the G&F website, and your not going to go to a meeting to find out more, then dont vote or give your input, becasue if you dont have the information you want, your making a missinformed vote. this could be (and in my opinion IS) the best option offered, but people making missinformed desicions (being scared by the word "commercial") and voting against it, and then we are as residents will be stuck in an open pool with NR and all we have to help us is a bonus point or two!