hossblur
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 10,666
>>But if you know of
>>better candidates in Utah than
>>the ones we got in
>>office please let me know
>>I would be happy to
>>take an honest look at
>>them.
>
>Great question. I've been trying to
>figure out more about Eric
>Eliason who is running against
>Rob Bishop but can't figure
>where he stands on public
>lands. Anybody know?
>
>*********************************************
>
>Also, I found this excerpt from
>an article written by Hal
>Herring, contributing editor at Field
>& Stream, that was published
>June 25, 2007. Oh how
>times have changed....
>
>"But on the issue of public
>lands in general and their
>value to the future of
>hunting and fishing, Peay and
>SFW have taken an unequivocal
>stand in opposition to some
>Republican policies. When the Bush
>administration presented a precedent-setting plan
>to sell off 300,000 acres
>of federal land, Peay and
>SFW were adamantly opposed. SFW
>has also bucked entrenched so-called
>?wise-use? groups and advocated for
>more controls over all-terrain vehicle
>use on isolated public lands."
>
>
>Grizzly
There obviously aren't any, the R had to go to New Hampshire to find one.
emphasise again here the word ?some? ? some of these lands. So just to repeat again, we're not talking about our national parks. We?re not talking about our national monuments. We?re not talking about declared wilderness. We?re talking about land that is sitting there ? untouched, untouchable, garden-variety land.
Mike Lee
Can we at least agree to stop using the word Transfer?
He isnt, he talking about selling everything not a national park.
That means your "garden variety" Boulder, Kaibab, Manti, etc, etc.
You elitists that hunt public land(Lee's name for us all) will just need to realize the disaster it is, and how much better things will be when that changes.
From the party of HUNTIN, FISHIN, PUBLIC LAND.
>>better candidates in Utah than
>>the ones we got in
>>office please let me know
>>I would be happy to
>>take an honest look at
>>them.
>
>Great question. I've been trying to
>figure out more about Eric
>Eliason who is running against
>Rob Bishop but can't figure
>where he stands on public
>lands. Anybody know?
>
>*********************************************
>
>Also, I found this excerpt from
>an article written by Hal
>Herring, contributing editor at Field
>& Stream, that was published
>June 25, 2007. Oh how
>times have changed....
>
>"But on the issue of public
>lands in general and their
>value to the future of
>hunting and fishing, Peay and
>SFW have taken an unequivocal
>stand in opposition to some
>Republican policies. When the Bush
>administration presented a precedent-setting plan
>to sell off 300,000 acres
>of federal land, Peay and
>SFW were adamantly opposed. SFW
>has also bucked entrenched so-called
>?wise-use? groups and advocated for
>more controls over all-terrain vehicle
>use on isolated public lands."
>
>
>Grizzly
There obviously aren't any, the R had to go to New Hampshire to find one.
emphasise again here the word ?some? ? some of these lands. So just to repeat again, we're not talking about our national parks. We?re not talking about our national monuments. We?re not talking about declared wilderness. We?re talking about land that is sitting there ? untouched, untouchable, garden-variety land.
Mike Lee
Can we at least agree to stop using the word Transfer?
He isnt, he talking about selling everything not a national park.
That means your "garden variety" Boulder, Kaibab, Manti, etc, etc.
You elitists that hunt public land(Lee's name for us all) will just need to realize the disaster it is, and how much better things will be when that changes.
From the party of HUNTIN, FISHIN, PUBLIC LAND.