I'm not arguing that whatever process they have going on is appropriate. Maybe it isn't, but regardless, if Taylor is telling the truth, which he likely is, then Trump committed a crime and I certainly don't think the crime should be overlooked just because the democrats and republicans can't agree on how to conduct the process.
The process hasn't been used much and the constitution is vague, and for the two parties to agree on the process is a long shot at best.
But none-the-less, if Taylor's story is true, Trump is guilty, no matter what either party says or does in regard to the process of impeachment inquiry.
At this point, I think the house just needs to wait to hear Tim Morrison's testimony and see how it matches up to Taylor's and Sondland's. If he testifies with the same account as Taylor, then I think it's a slam dunk that Trump is guilty.
Remmeber, Taylor is just a government employee who worked his way up. Sondland was appointed because he was a big Trump donor and supporter.
>
LAST EDITED ON Oct-23-19
>AT 12:50?PM (MST)
>
>
>well it looks like Schiffty's Magic
>show is beginning to smell
>more than a little fishy
>now. They're refusing to let
>members of Congress many of
>whom have top level security
>clearance into the room.... WHY?....The
>dems have had their bluff
>called and the lack of
>transparency is quite telling into
>the fact the motives behind
>the secret secret investigation meeting
>aren't so above board........
>
>So flounder don't you think refusing
>access to the other party
>shows bias? Even the jury
>gets to hear the witnesses
>in court.....Let alone the defenses
>lawyers. How many times in
>your life have you seen
>crap like this going on
>by the GOP? Never seems
>to come to mind and
>that right there is quite
>telling.....Schiffty's been called out and
>lets see if the media
>covers it because there's been
>a hole in their bucket
>for a while now and
>at some point they have
>to start reporting the real
>news instead of the false
>narrative.........LOL
>
>If this happened to you don't
>you think you'd be squawking
>loudly and calling attention to
>the bias and lack of
>justice in the proceedings.
>
>I said Taylor wasn't guilty of
>anything and that would infer
>he told the truth.
>
>You better open your eyes Flounder
>this isn't the way things
>have been done in the
>past and it reeks of
>bias and I think you're
>smart enough to know that
>not the way justice should
>work. The so called conspiracy
>thing is reality if it
>wasn't all those folks would
>still be working at the
>FBI, DOJ, State Department and
>other places who were let
>go......They were let go for
>cause in regards to the
>Russia Collusion Matter so open
>your damn eyes.......The heads of
>those agencies not the pawns.......HMMMM
>
Brian Latturner
MonsterMuleys.com
@mm_founder on Instagram
LIKE MonsterMuleys.com
on Facebook!