LAST EDITED ON May-17-14 AT 03:58PM (MST)[p]
LAST EDITED ON May-17-14 AT 03:57?PM (MST)
LAST EDITED ON May-17-14 AT 03:57?PM (MST)
>>
LAST EDITED ON May-17-14
>>AT 10:20?AM (MST)
>>
>>
LAST EDITED ON May-17-14
>>AT 10:17?AM (MST)
>>
>>>The way it was explained to
>>>me is the actual draw
>>>for names was done right,
>>>and doesn't need to be
>>>done again. What was wrong
>>>is how they were entered
>>>in the computer. A lot
>>>of NR weren't entered.
>>>
>>>It's taking a while to fix,
>>>because they want to make
>>>sure it absolutely right before
>>>releasing the results this time.
>>>
>>>
>>>This info came directly from a
>>>hunt planner who I know
>>>well.
>>
>>
>> +1 Thx for putting
>>out the correct info!
>>
>>I know of a NR friend
>>who's points went to 0
>>- he is a non
>>res and put in for
>>21 first choice archery..
>>According to the recap
>>numbers this did not happen...
>>
>>
>>I was also told by the
>>CPW that the hunt recaps
>>is where the problem for
>>deer is and once they
>>have a problem they run
>>all the rest of the
>>draws (elk antelope ect) and
>>figure out the problem if
>>there is one in the
>>extra week they have after
>>all the draws are done.
>>
>>
>>Again dont believe the hunt recaps
>>that were posted as they
>>did not populate the NR
>>hunters.
>>
>>Finally if you believe that the
>>hunt recaps posted for a
>>few min were right they
>>are not.
>>
>>Did I say the CPW has
>>explicitly said that the hunt
>>recap numbers posted for deer
>>are not right
..
>
>So are you saying that if
>our points didn't go to
>0 For 2014 we did
>not draw no matter what.
>The preference point update was
>correct?
Nope! Never said that. I was told the points that showed could have been right, or wrong. We won't know for sure until they say...Ok, these is the final results.
Now we're back to 2013 status. Hopefully, the next change we see will be right. They sure like to mess with our emotions.