Cooak, Because I have a keen analytical mind I suspect you don't like me much, I couldn't give two jerks of a little squirrels' tail. But for the record my 30 yr history of actions has never been inconsistent, with one youthful indiscretion of pushing for a winter range limited archery tag back in the early 90's. My position on the issue changed as I thought it through.
If you knew what you claim to know instead of just assuming and inferring you would change your view on my "actions", you might even find there were fewer "actions" than you thought there were. But it is not my job to educate you. I have neither the time nor the inclination. You know only a snippet of info here and there and filled in the rest based on your own biases. You are free to do that and I simply don't care.
Bessy... What can I say you are just such a Bessy... but nobody else could do it.
Tomichi, sorry I doubted you, but the moneyed interests always come in late and hard and wield lots of clout. This vampire may yet take a stake thru the heart to put it in the ground once and for all when the dow gets their paycut there will be much "wailing and gnashing of teeth". (all for the good of the animals, of course... this has NOTHING to do with money...)
This is a great example of David slaying Goliath, playing within the rules as they are written, and I , for one, am very surprised, and happy in spite of Cooak's assertions of hypocrisy.
Great day for the older/bigger deer of Co. their learned survival skills will not be compromised by legal poaching- the key word there is LEGAL. Elk96 if you have evidence use it otherwise take your opinions to the next set of meetings and let the chips fall where they may.