>Dude did you notice that the
>FBI director only said that
>Obama did not order the
>FISA search warrant. He also
>did not say who it
>was in the Obama administration
>that did propose the search
>warrant request for the wire
>taps.
How is that you are sure that there were wiretaps?
> Unlike you the
>idiot, we are fully aware
>that Obama is not stupid
>enough to walk straight into
>the FBI Director's office and
>demand that a search warrant
>be obtained to tap the
>phones and computers in Trump
>Tower. On a side note,
>we have not found out
>who in the Obama administration
>ordered the tapping of certain
>news reporter's computers a while
>back have we.
Have you explained this to President Trump? That there isn't a straight line connection between President Obama and alleged wire tapping? Can you cite the sourced named by President Trump as to where he got this information? Unnamed sources are called fake news, right?
> No Dude, Obama
>may be a crooked con
>man, but he is a
>smart con man that makes
>sure his hands do not
>get caught in the cookie
>jar. He made sure it
>was one of his henchmen
>or henchwoman that proposed the
>need for a wire tap.
>My bet is on AG
>Loretta Lynch as the henchwoman
>that pushed the wire tapping
>to the FBI.
Whether or not Lynch was aware of the any wire taps doesn't mean much of anything if- 1. there were no wire taps, which at this point nobody has proven or 2. If you are betting on this being the case, how are you going to prove it happened?
> Any person
>of average common sense, that
>leaves Dude and Corn out,
>would also have figured out
>by now they did not
>find any collusion between Trump
>and Putin or they would
>have leaked that information in
>a New York minute.
At this point collusion no longer matters, The White House has completely lost control of the Russia Story, to the point that the AG has recused himself going against the advice of The President. It is now all damage control over how stupidily the White House has handled the story.
> Just
>another dirty low down scandal
>that has plagued the Obama
>administration from day one to
>even now when he is
>out of office. The Democrats
>are getting desperate and it
>is showing to everyone. I
>will set back and enjoy
>the rats jumping ship as
>they will be doing very
>soon, but Dude and Corn
>are stupid enough to stay
>aboard and drown like the
>rats they are by supporting
>Obama and his dirty tactics.
So do you think that Obama will be tarnished over this accusation enough to make up for the damage being done to the Trump White House? If so what harm will come to Obama? Will he have to give back his Nobel Peace Prize, His $60 million book advance? His $2 billion Presidential library, life long pension? What exactly will happen which would be bad for Obama compared to what can happen in terms of the Trump Presidency?
>
>
>
>
>
>RELH
I get it you want to blame Obama for this but remember the President is the most powerful man in the world. He could have picked up the phone and told the AG to investigate this as it didn't involve the Russian connection, it involved domestic surveillance, with or without a FISA warrant. He could have gotten his facts in a row prior to a twitter campaign of nebulous and questionable accusations.
Now congress is in a position of working on this instead of working on the agenda. That will show Obama how bad he really is.
Nemont