T
TFinalshot
Guest
Man's footprint on ecosystem of Earth 'too heavy to be sustained'
By Lewis Smith
A WWF study says that we have been living beyond the environment's means for two decades
THE Earth?s natural resources are being used 25 per cent faster than the planet can renew them, analysis by WWF indicates.
Measurements of crop yields, carbon-dioxide emissions, fishing and the use of forests suggest that Mankind?s ecological footprint is too big to be sustained.
Since 1961 it has more than tripled in size and, for the past 20 years, mankind has been living beyond its ecological means, a WWF report said. It is the equivalent, in banking terms, of living off capital rather than interest.
Using United Nations projections of the worldwide growth of the human population and economies, the report predicts that by the middle of the century ?large-scale ecosystem collapse? is likely.
The world?s average footprint is calculated to be 2.2 hectares per capita but only 1.8 hectares of each person?s consumption can be regenerated by the planet each year.
Carbon-dioxide emissions are the biggest single factor within the footprint, accounting for up to 48 per cent of man?s impact on the globe, according to the WWF Living Planet Report.
The speed at which resources are being used has had the effect of destroying biodiversity at an unprecedented rate.
By tracking the fortunes of 1,313 species of vertebrates from around the world, the report indicated that there had been a 30 per cent slump in wildlife since 1970.
Tropical species, including mammals, reptiles and birds, were the most badly hit of the 695 land-based animals monitored. They declined by an average of 55 per cent, while the populations of temperate creatures have, overall, remained stable since 1970.
Marine species declined by an average of 25 per cent in the Pacific, Atlantic, Indian and Southern Oceans. The index monitored 274 species and there was particular concern about the loss of cod, tuna and turtles.
Late last century the land habitat that vanished fastest were tropical grassland, flooded grasslands and savannas, and tropical dry forests. They were replaced with either crops or grazing land for livestock.
Mangroves were highlighted as the most endangered habitat, with more than a third being lost to developments between 1990 and 2000, twice the rate at which tropical forests are being destroyed.
Jonathan Loh, of the Zoological Society of London, one of the authors of the report, said: ?The Living Planet Index is a stark indication of the rapid and ongoing loss of biodiversity worldwide.
?Populations of species in terrestrial, marine and freshwater ecosystems have declined by more than 30 per cent since 1970, a rate that is unprecedented in human history. In the tropics the declines are even more dramatic, as natural resources are being intensively exploited for human use.?
His colleague, Ben Collen, added: ?It makes depressing reading. It's another stark indication that we are losing biodiversity at an unprecedented rate. But one of the messages is we do have a choice at this point. We can moderate our consumption and become a less throwaway society.?
Man's footprint on ecosystem of Earth 'too heavy to be sustained'
By Lewis Smith
A WWF study says that we have been living beyond the environment's means for two decades
THE Earth?s natural resources are being used 25 per cent faster than the planet can renew them, analysis by WWF indicates.
Measurements of crop yields, carbon-dioxide emissions, fishing and the use of forests suggest that Mankind?s ecological footprint is too big to be sustained.
Since 1961 it has more than tripled in size and, for the past 20 years, mankind has been living beyond its ecological means, a WWF report said. It is the equivalent, in banking terms, of living off capital rather than interest.
Using United Nations projections of the worldwide growth of the human population and economies, the report predicts that by the middle of the century ?large-scale ecosystem collapse? is likely.
The world?s average footprint is calculated to be 2.2 hectares per capita but only 1.8 hectares of each person?s consumption can be regenerated by the planet each year.
Carbon-dioxide emissions are the biggest single factor within the footprint, accounting for up to 48 per cent of man?s impact on the globe, according to the WWF Living Planet Report.
The speed at which resources are being used has had the effect of destroying biodiversity at an unprecedented rate.
By tracking the fortunes of 1,313 species of vertebrates from around the world, the report indicated that there had been a 30 per cent slump in wildlife since 1970.
Tropical species, including mammals, reptiles and birds, were the most badly hit of the 695 land-based animals monitored. They declined by an average of 55 per cent, while the populations of temperate creatures have, overall, remained stable since 1970.
Marine species declined by an average of 25 per cent in the Pacific, Atlantic, Indian and Southern Oceans. The index monitored 274 species and there was particular concern about the loss of cod, tuna and turtles.
Late last century the land habitat that vanished fastest were tropical grassland, flooded grasslands and savannas, and tropical dry forests. They were replaced with either crops or grazing land for livestock.
Mangroves were highlighted as the most endangered habitat, with more than a third being lost to developments between 1990 and 2000, twice the rate at which tropical forests are being destroyed.
Jonathan Loh, of the Zoological Society of London, one of the authors of the report, said: ?The Living Planet Index is a stark indication of the rapid and ongoing loss of biodiversity worldwide.
?Populations of species in terrestrial, marine and freshwater ecosystems have declined by more than 30 per cent since 1970, a rate that is unprecedented in human history. In the tropics the declines are even more dramatic, as natural resources are being intensively exploited for human use.?
His colleague, Ben Collen, added: ?It makes depressing reading. It's another stark indication that we are losing biodiversity at an unprecedented rate. But one of the messages is we do have a choice at this point. We can moderate our consumption and become a less throwaway society.?
By Lewis Smith
A WWF study says that we have been living beyond the environment's means for two decades
THE Earth?s natural resources are being used 25 per cent faster than the planet can renew them, analysis by WWF indicates.
Measurements of crop yields, carbon-dioxide emissions, fishing and the use of forests suggest that Mankind?s ecological footprint is too big to be sustained.
Since 1961 it has more than tripled in size and, for the past 20 years, mankind has been living beyond its ecological means, a WWF report said. It is the equivalent, in banking terms, of living off capital rather than interest.
Using United Nations projections of the worldwide growth of the human population and economies, the report predicts that by the middle of the century ?large-scale ecosystem collapse? is likely.
The world?s average footprint is calculated to be 2.2 hectares per capita but only 1.8 hectares of each person?s consumption can be regenerated by the planet each year.
Carbon-dioxide emissions are the biggest single factor within the footprint, accounting for up to 48 per cent of man?s impact on the globe, according to the WWF Living Planet Report.
The speed at which resources are being used has had the effect of destroying biodiversity at an unprecedented rate.
By tracking the fortunes of 1,313 species of vertebrates from around the world, the report indicated that there had been a 30 per cent slump in wildlife since 1970.
Tropical species, including mammals, reptiles and birds, were the most badly hit of the 695 land-based animals monitored. They declined by an average of 55 per cent, while the populations of temperate creatures have, overall, remained stable since 1970.
Marine species declined by an average of 25 per cent in the Pacific, Atlantic, Indian and Southern Oceans. The index monitored 274 species and there was particular concern about the loss of cod, tuna and turtles.
Late last century the land habitat that vanished fastest were tropical grassland, flooded grasslands and savannas, and tropical dry forests. They were replaced with either crops or grazing land for livestock.
Mangroves were highlighted as the most endangered habitat, with more than a third being lost to developments between 1990 and 2000, twice the rate at which tropical forests are being destroyed.
Jonathan Loh, of the Zoological Society of London, one of the authors of the report, said: ?The Living Planet Index is a stark indication of the rapid and ongoing loss of biodiversity worldwide.
?Populations of species in terrestrial, marine and freshwater ecosystems have declined by more than 30 per cent since 1970, a rate that is unprecedented in human history. In the tropics the declines are even more dramatic, as natural resources are being intensively exploited for human use.?
His colleague, Ben Collen, added: ?It makes depressing reading. It's another stark indication that we are losing biodiversity at an unprecedented rate. But one of the messages is we do have a choice at this point. We can moderate our consumption and become a less throwaway society.?
Man's footprint on ecosystem of Earth 'too heavy to be sustained'
By Lewis Smith
A WWF study says that we have been living beyond the environment's means for two decades
THE Earth?s natural resources are being used 25 per cent faster than the planet can renew them, analysis by WWF indicates.
Measurements of crop yields, carbon-dioxide emissions, fishing and the use of forests suggest that Mankind?s ecological footprint is too big to be sustained.
Since 1961 it has more than tripled in size and, for the past 20 years, mankind has been living beyond its ecological means, a WWF report said. It is the equivalent, in banking terms, of living off capital rather than interest.
Using United Nations projections of the worldwide growth of the human population and economies, the report predicts that by the middle of the century ?large-scale ecosystem collapse? is likely.
The world?s average footprint is calculated to be 2.2 hectares per capita but only 1.8 hectares of each person?s consumption can be regenerated by the planet each year.
Carbon-dioxide emissions are the biggest single factor within the footprint, accounting for up to 48 per cent of man?s impact on the globe, according to the WWF Living Planet Report.
The speed at which resources are being used has had the effect of destroying biodiversity at an unprecedented rate.
By tracking the fortunes of 1,313 species of vertebrates from around the world, the report indicated that there had been a 30 per cent slump in wildlife since 1970.
Tropical species, including mammals, reptiles and birds, were the most badly hit of the 695 land-based animals monitored. They declined by an average of 55 per cent, while the populations of temperate creatures have, overall, remained stable since 1970.
Marine species declined by an average of 25 per cent in the Pacific, Atlantic, Indian and Southern Oceans. The index monitored 274 species and there was particular concern about the loss of cod, tuna and turtles.
Late last century the land habitat that vanished fastest were tropical grassland, flooded grasslands and savannas, and tropical dry forests. They were replaced with either crops or grazing land for livestock.
Mangroves were highlighted as the most endangered habitat, with more than a third being lost to developments between 1990 and 2000, twice the rate at which tropical forests are being destroyed.
Jonathan Loh, of the Zoological Society of London, one of the authors of the report, said: ?The Living Planet Index is a stark indication of the rapid and ongoing loss of biodiversity worldwide.
?Populations of species in terrestrial, marine and freshwater ecosystems have declined by more than 30 per cent since 1970, a rate that is unprecedented in human history. In the tropics the declines are even more dramatic, as natural resources are being intensively exploited for human use.?
His colleague, Ben Collen, added: ?It makes depressing reading. It's another stark indication that we are losing biodiversity at an unprecedented rate. But one of the messages is we do have a choice at this point. We can moderate our consumption and become a less throwaway society.?
