>You are always bragging about not
>voting for Trump as a
>matter of principal. That was
>just a vote for Hillary
>and you know it. The
>question you need to answer
>is would Hillary have been
>better on the military, ISIS,
>economy the deficit and the
>courts. If the answer is
>yes then you should have
>just been honest and voted
>for her. If Trump is
>better on those issues then
>you are better off.
That is a cop out of epic proportions. First of all a vote for anybody but Trump is not a vote for Hillary because of the way the winner take all Electoral College works. People who claim this are either just ill informed on the system or out right dishonest about their political aims.
So with the Electoral College system a vote for neither Hillary or Trump is a vote against both of them, to claim otherwise shows a shocking inability to understand our system.
Also if, as a free American, I am required to vote for two shytty candidates because that is what the parties told me, I will always refuse to be a sheeple to the party, period. Maybe you believe you are stuck with the lesser of two evils. When you still vote based on what the party offers, then you aren't really free, you are a slave to the paryt.
Is there a difference between what Hillary would have done and what Trump is doing? Please explain what that is. THE ONLY THING is the Supreme Court Domination but he broke the Senate to do it and now we have mob rule in the future regardless of how liberal any Justice nominated by a liberal President actually is.
Other than that Trump is ticking off the list of Democrat's priorities way faster that any Democrat president could have hoped.
Nemont
Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.