>"In that system they have a
>chance every year when in
>very hard to draw units,
>while under a PP system
>they have NO chance to
>draw until they are in
>a PP pool small anough
>to have a 100% chance
>at the available tags."
>
>Wrong. Our system will be based
>on 50/50 pp/random drawing. Every
>year, every applicant has a
>chance at a tag. This
>also helps keep point pools
>lowers as all different numbers
>of point holders will draw.
>
>
>Topgun,
>If you think my comprehension is
>zero, then you may choose
>to not respond to my
>posts. I actually think you
>are the one who doesn't
>get it. As a non-resident,
> you already have a
>point system and are living
>with it and hunting Wyoming
>every year. You act like
>this will affect you when
>it won't. If you know
>friends who are residents, let
>them speak for themselves. I'm
>sure it would a more
>civil discussion.
>
>Jeff
***I was not referring to you and the PP system I'm talking about is what the NRs have right now. I had no idea what your PP system you're devising includes until you just mentioned it, so how could I be wrong when I wasn't even talking about it?! Yep, I'm hunting Wyoming every year and it sure as heck hasn't been by using that sorry azz PP system they came up with. I'm lucky enough to be able to get leftover tags for the most part and have good hunting because I've hunted out there so many years I know the areas I can do that without investing much, if anything, in the PP scheme. I do have 5PPs for deer and wish I had never got caught up in it because the PP creep is such that the one unit I'm interested in keeps going up every year, which is another big negative in straight PP systems we're stuck with if you're not in it fromt the year of inception.
>chance every year when in
>very hard to draw units,
>while under a PP system
>they have NO chance to
>draw until they are in
>a PP pool small anough
>to have a 100% chance
>at the available tags."
>
>Wrong. Our system will be based
>on 50/50 pp/random drawing. Every
>year, every applicant has a
>chance at a tag. This
>also helps keep point pools
>lowers as all different numbers
>of point holders will draw.
>
>
>Topgun,
>If you think my comprehension is
>zero, then you may choose
>to not respond to my
>posts. I actually think you
>are the one who doesn't
>get it. As a non-resident,
> you already have a
>point system and are living
>with it and hunting Wyoming
>every year. You act like
>this will affect you when
>it won't. If you know
>friends who are residents, let
>them speak for themselves. I'm
>sure it would a more
>civil discussion.
>
>Jeff
***I was not referring to you and the PP system I'm talking about is what the NRs have right now. I had no idea what your PP system you're devising includes until you just mentioned it, so how could I be wrong when I wasn't even talking about it?! Yep, I'm hunting Wyoming every year and it sure as heck hasn't been by using that sorry azz PP system they came up with. I'm lucky enough to be able to get leftover tags for the most part and have good hunting because I've hunted out there so many years I know the areas I can do that without investing much, if anything, in the PP scheme. I do have 5PPs for deer and wish I had never got caught up in it because the PP creep is such that the one unit I'm interested in keeps going up every year, which is another big negative in straight PP systems we're stuck with if you're not in it fromt the year of inception.