LAST EDITED ON Apr-30-14 AT 08:46AM (MST)[p]Last year a Unit Wide landowner tag went to a person who owned 0 (zero) acres.
http://www.monstermuleys.info/cgi-b...73&forum=DCForumID34&archive=yes#.U2EGffldV8E
Might have been a misprint, but there have certainly been tags for <10 acres.
Edited to add:
The Private Land Allocation Statue does not mention acreage under minimum qualifications-- just that the property must provide "meaningful benefit". There is likely much variability and discretion involved.
"19.30.5.8 PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS:
A. Minimum qualifications:
(1) Private lands that lie within core occupied elk range.
(2) Private lands that provide meaningful benefits to elk, at least occasionally, as determined by the
appropriate district officer or game manager.
(3) Only landowners or lessees who agree in writing to accept elk on their property will be considered.
Any landowner that files a depredation complaint regarding elk or takes action pursuant to Section 17-2-7.2 NMSA
1978 shall have automatically elected to become ineligible for continued participation in this program. Exceptions to
this may be allowed when short-term or unusual circumstances that are typically not associated with the normal
presence of elk using land and forage on the property exist. In these instances, if the landowner desires to continue
contributing to elk, the department may allow the landowner to continue participating in this system while seeking
resolution to the short-term or unusual damage pursuant to the depredation program. Evidence of depredation may
be used as documentation of elk presence to ensure the appropriate ECR has been assigned.
(4) Landowner must agree that participation is voluntary, is based on annual variation in habitat and
elk populations, and there is no guarantee of a specific number of authorizations issued each year.
(5) All participating properties annually will be subject to the requirements found in this Section.
(6) Private lands that lie within villages, towns or recorded subdivisions with covenants or ordinances
that prohibit hunting and/or the discharge of firearms will be ineligible to participate unless part of a combined
property choice under Paragraph (8) of Subsection E of 19.30.5.9 NMAC.
(7) Private lands that if hunted, would result in safety concerns as determined by the district officer
will be ineligible to participate unless allowed pursuant to a specific agreement containing provisions for minimizing
safety concerns.