This is what he says: "This buck has been king years ago for me before anyone found the buck “King” on the range."Nevermind. Looks like click bait. In the comments, the poster admits it's not the same buck.
Yep, he knew exactly what he was doing with that video title.Nevermind. Looks like click bait. In the comments, the poster admits it's not the same buck.
F&^%K I hate whispering gingers.......
F&^%K I hate whispering gingers.......
Well, if I remember right, he’ll sell you his secrets to success via personal phone call. The dude has killed some great bucks over the years but I think social media helped pull the trigger on a couple 140 bucks this year. Everyone needs a few “likes” I suppose.I like Matt's videos. Pretty authentic guy on the mountain I think. Stud buck, but as has been mentioned, its not THAT King...
That's what I hate about social media got to kill anythingWell, if I remember right, he’ll sell you his secrets to success via personal phone call. The dude has killed some great bucks over the years but I think social media helped pull the trigger on a couple 140 bucks this year. Everyone needs a few “likes” I suppose.
the double tittie buck is back so thats all i care about. He's looking like a 225-230 buck.
Didn't even kill one this whole year and believe it or not, I still won…I never kill big bucks so I am held to a very low standard so I win nearly every season.
Definitely makes sense. I could agree with it.After looking over his sheds from the last 3 years I would say probably 7. That first set was just too big for him to have only been a 3 year old at the time, but not unheard of.
Is what was crazy was his dropper on the first year set was just a little bump, crazy what it turned into the next year.
Makes you wonder how accurate the labs are too I've heard stories of guys sending 2 teeth in off the same animal and getting 2 very different agesDefinitely makes sense. I could agree with it.
Saw a 240 buck get lab aged at 5. Makes a guy wonder how big of a genetic freaks those monster bucks are.
I would say it’s fairly accurate and would question guys who said they sent off two and received different ages. But like everything I’m sure there is a % of error.Makes you wonder how accurate the labs are too I've heard stories of guys sending 2 teeth in off the same animal and getting 2 very different ages
They claim that they are accurate on a population level but not on an individual level, meaning that if you age 100 deer your going to get good data on average but there are going to be some outliers so if you have one deer that you absolutely need to know the age of you can’t take it as gospel. A good friend of mine has all the deer and elk aged off their ranch and they get one now and then that they have plenty of history with (sheds etc) and it’ll come back as 2.5 yrs old or vice versa. The actual mechanics of what they are doing when they cut and dye those teeth doesn’t take into account trauma or injury to the teeth so it’s gonna have some total outliers.Makes you wonder how accurate the labs are too I've heard stories of guys sending 2 teeth in off the same animal and getting 2 very different ages