Is This True?

cantkillathing

Very Active Member
Messages
1,475
Gun Law Update by Alan Korwin,
> >> Author Gun Laws of America
> >>
> >> Gun-ban list proposed
> >>
> >> Slipping below the radar (or under the short-term memory cap), the
> >> Democrats
> >> have already leaked a gun-ban list, even under the Bush administration
> >> when
> >> they knew full well it had no chance of passage (HR 1022, 110th
> >> Congress).
> >> 0AIt serves as a framework for the new list the Brady's plan to
introduce
> >> shortly.
> >>
> >> I have an outline of the Brady's current plans and targets of
> >> opportunity,
> >> It's horrific. They're going after the courts, regulatory agencies,
> >> firearms
> >> dealers and statutes in an all out effort to restrict we the people.
> >> They've
> >> made little mention of criminals.
> >>
> >> Now more than ever, attention to the entire Bill of Rights is critical.
> >> Gun
> >> bans will impact our freedoms under search and seizure, due process,
> >> confiscated property, states' rights, free speech, right to assemble
and
> >> more, in addition to the Second Amendment.
> >>
> >> The Democrats current gun-ban-list proposal (final list will be worse):
> >>
> >> Rifles (or copies or duplicates):
> >>
> >> M1 Carbine, Sturm Ruger Mini-14, AR-15, Bushmaster XM15, Armalite M15,
> >> AR-10, Thompson 1927, Thompson M1; AK, AKM, AKS, AK-47, AK-74, ARM,
> >> MAK90,
> >> NHM 90, NHM 91, SA 85, SA 93, VEPR; Olympic Arms PCR; AR70, Calico
> >> Liberty,
> >> Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or Dragunov SVU, Fabrique National FN/FAL,
> >> FN/LAR,
> >>
> >> or FNC, Hi-Point Carbine, HK-91, HK-93, HK-94, HK-PSG-1, Thompson 1927
> >> Commando, Kel-Tec Sub Rifle; Saiga, SAR-8, SAR-4800, SKS with
detachable
> >> magazine, SLG 95, SLR
> >> 95 or 96, Steyr AU, Tavor, Uzi, Galil and Uzi Sporter, Galil Sporter,
or
> >> Galil Sniper Rifle (Galatz).
> >>
> >> Pistols (or copies or duplicates):
> >>
> >> Calico M-110, MAC-10, MAC-11, or MPA3, Olympic Arms OA, TEC-9, TEC-DC9,
> >> TEC-22 Scorpion, or AB-10, U zi.
> >>
> >> Shotguns (or copies or duplicates):
> >>
> >> Armscor 30 BG, SPAS 12 or LAW 12, Striker 12, Streetsweeper.
> >>
> >> Catch-all category (for anything missed or new designs):
> >>
> >> A semiautomatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has (i) a
> >> folding or telescoping stock, (ii) a threaded barrel, (iii) a pistol
grip
> >> (which includes ANYTHING that can serve as a grip, see below), (iv) a
> >> forward grip; or a barrel shroud.
> >>
> >> Any semiautomatic rifle with a fixed magazine that can accept more than
> >> 10
> >> rounds (except tubular magazine .22 rimfire rifles).
> >>
> >> A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a detachable
> >> magazine,
> >>
> >> and has (i) a second pistol grip, (ii) a threaded barrel, (iii) a
barrel
> >> shroud or (iv) can accept a detachable magazine outside of the pistol
> >> grip,
> >> and (v) a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept
more
> >> than 10 rounds.
> >>
> >> A semiautomatic shotgun with (i) a folding or telescoping stock, (ii) a
> >> pistol grip (see definition below), (iii) the ability to accept a
> >> detachable
> >>
> >> magazine or a fixed magazine capacity of more than 5 rounds, and (iv) a
> >> shotgun with a revolving cylinder.
> >>
> >> Frames or receivers for the above are included, along with conversion
> >> kits.
> >>
> >> Attorney General gets carte blanche to ban guns at will:
> >>
> >> Under the proposal, the U.S. Attorney General can add any
"semiautomatic
> >> rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement
> >> use,20or
> >>
> >> a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not
particularly
> >> suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General."
> >> Note
> >>
> >> that Obama's pick for this office (Eric Holder, confirmation hearing
set
> >> for
> >>
> >> Jan. 15) wrote a brief in the Heller case supporting the position that
> >> you
> >> have no right to have a working firearm in your own home.
> >>
> >> In making this determination, the bill says, "there shall be a
rebuttable
> >> presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States
military
> >> or
> >>
> >> any federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for
> >> sporting
> >>
> >> purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be particularly
> >> suitable
> >> for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in
a
> >> sporting event."
> >>
> >> In plain English this means that ANY firearm ever obtained by federal
> >> officers or the military is not suitable for the public.
> >>
> >> The last part is particularly clever, stating that a firearm doesn't
have
> >> a
> >> sporting purpose just because it can be used for sporting purpose -- is
> >> that
> >>
> >> devious or what? And of course, "sporting purpose" is a rights
> >> infringement
> >> with no constitutional or historical support whatsoever, invented by
> >> domestic enemies of the right to keep and bear arms to further their
> >> cause
> >> of disarming the innocent.
> >>
> >> Respectfully submitted, Alan Korwin, Author Gun Laws of America
> >> http://www.gunl aws.com/gloa.htm
 
YES

great post/pic, thanks for sharing

JB
497fc2397b939f19.jpg
 
LAST EDITED ON Feb-04-09 AT 09:21AM (MST)[p]it wont matter anyhow, we'll be taking guns because we wont be able to afford to buy them. . .
 
LAST EDITED ON Feb-04-09 AT 09:52AM (MST)[p]>LAST EDITED ON Feb-04-09
>AT 09:21?AM (MST)

>
>it wont matter anyhow, we'll be
>taking guns because we wont
>be able to afford to
>buy them. . .


Or feed them and if you read HR 45 you will not be able to teach your kids about guns with out braking the law.:(


Kyle
"If it moves shoot it again"
 
More change we can believe in!


Dont worry, once Obama is done with the military they wont be able to disarm a ten year old with a pellet gun!
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom