Milestone For Trump supporters

LAST EDITED ON Feb-12-19 AT 03:03PM (MST)[p]
None of it will matter when the world moves away from the US dollar as its currency. And it's the one disappointment I have with Trump.



#livelikezac
 
You only have one disappointment from Trump?

Will he sign his name to the agreement they just got done? It has less wall money in it than the deal he would have had prior to the shutdown. Hell of a deal maker that holds out for less.

Nemont
 
LAST EDITED ON Feb-12-19 AT 04:04PM (MST)[p]He will, then he'll go it alone rather than waste anymore time. It's obvious in his tone and words, all I heard was fugh them jackwagons, watch this! I won't have a problem with that other than I'm sure the budget is bloated with things we could do without.



#livelikezac
 
I have to admit, I'm curious about the breaking point now. When will the house of cards fall? How far out on that limb can we go? Let's find out.
 
>LAST EDITED ON Feb-12-19
>AT 04:04?PM (MST)
>
>He will, then he'll go it
>alone rather than waste anymore
>time. It's obvious in his
>tone and words, all I
>heard was fugh them jackwagons,
>watch this! I won't have
>a problem with that other
>than I'm sure the budget
>is bloated with things we
>could do without.
>
>
>
>#livelikezac

On what Constitutional authority does he have to spend money that is not authorized and funded by congress? If it is the national emergency route, just remember Republicans won't always sit in the Oval office and the bar for what is a national emergency will have been forever lowered.

If the people's elected representatives and senators have not come to the point of deciding that illegal immigration is the biggest threat to our nation I am curious why conservatives would support an president acting alone? So the whining about the "imperial" president is only valid with a liberal sits in the big chair and when not then the hell with the Constitution and how our founders set up our system.

Nemont
 
>>LAST EDITED ON Feb-12-19
>>AT 04:04?PM (MST)
>>
>>He will, then he'll go it
>>alone rather than waste anymore
>>time. It's obvious in his
>>tone and words, all I
>>heard was fugh them jackwagons,
>>watch this! I won't have
>>a problem with that other
>>than I'm sure the budget
>>is bloated with things we
>>could do without.
>>
>>
>>
>>#livelikezac
>
>On what Constitutional authority does he
>have to spend money that
>is not authorized and funded
>by congress? If it
>is the national emergency route,
>just remember Republicans won't always
>sit in the Oval office
>and the bar for what
>is a national emergency will
>have been forever lowered.
>
>If the people's elected representatives and
>senators have not come to
>the point of deciding that
>illegal immigration is the
>biggest threat to our nation
>I am curious why conservatives
>would support an president acting
>alone? So the
>whining about the "imperial" president
>is only valid with a
>liberal sits in the big
>chair and when not then
>the hell with the Constitution
>and how our founders set
>up our system.
>
>Nemont

It will need to work it's way thru the courts, so hes really not unbridled. If Roberts wasn't a constitution hating POS Obamacare never would have passed and the checks and balances would have worked as intended. As soon as the left gives up the ghost of RBG we should be in good shape for the foreseeable future.



#livelikezac
 
The plan has always been for a debt jubilee that's why congress couldn't care less and Obama went unbridled, spending money from all the Auto makers debt repayment and settlements instead on putting it against the debt. Soro's and many of his organizations did quite well getting monies from Obama and the dems for activist groups, so where's the concern for that?. Congress didn't allocate most of that either.

So Nemont since you didn't vote for a contender it would seem your sense of guilt is misplaced against us. You threw your vote in the trash can which is far more irresponsible than actually voting for a candidate to make a difference like we tried. So why do the dems insist on hundreds of millions for Planned Parenthood......just to get chunks of it back as campaign monies?

If the ship crashed on the other guys watch after Obama, it only set the stage for Hillary & co (sure thing) to take us to the new world order using insolvency in their propaganda. How else can you explain the lack of concern for the billions upon billions we keep spending on illegal immigrants. The laws aren't being enforced and there's no intent to do otherwise.

The new green deal only supports their plan to lead us down that path, so we're at the others mercy, to decide our fate...Other countries have been insolvent and survived but our fate rests in our own hands, will we do it a free country or as socialist's......Freedom really rides on the next election and the left isn't going to make your life better because they want to raise your taxes, take your estate, and make your government more obtrusive than any time in our nations history. We're becoming a nation without borders and without laws and that's just one flush away from becoming the end product in a socialist cesspool.
 
Ahh, so the Executive and the Judicial branch control the funds. Got it, glad we all agree the constitution can be twisted to whatever fits our current whims. Have to get around that pesky legislative branch that has no business allocating funds (which the president's party controlled for 2 years).



>
>It will need to work it's
>way thru the courts, so
>hes really not unbridled. If
>Roberts wasn't a constitution hating
>POS Obamacare never would have
>passed and the checks and
>balances would have worked as
>intended. As soon as the
>left gives up the ghost
>of RBG we should be
>in good shape for the
>foreseeable future.
>
>
>
>#livelikezac
 
LAST EDITED ON Feb-12-19 AT 07:14PM (MST)[p]it's alright now...in fact it's a blast....


Debt's good now. it won't be a problem again until a democrat is back in the whitehouse in 2021.




Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
>Ahh, so the Executive and the
>Judicial branch control the funds.
>Got it, glad we all
>agree the constitution can be
>twisted to whatever fits our
>current whims. Have to get
>around that pesky legislative branch
>that has no business allocating
>funds (which the president's party
>controlled for 2 years).
>
>
>
>>
>>It will need to work it's
>>way thru the courts, so
>>hes really not unbridled. If
>>Roberts wasn't a constitution hating
>>POS Obamacare never would have
>>passed and the checks and
>>balances would have worked as
>>intended. As soon as the
>>left gives up the ghost
>>of RBG we should be
>>in good shape for the
>>foreseeable future.
>>
>>
>>
>>#livelikezac

It shouldn't need to go thru the court but that is the state of today's affairs. You can skip to the last paragraph if you'd like.

https://www.heritage.org/the-constitution/report/who-responsible-americas-security


#livelikezac
 
LAST EDITED ON Feb-12-19 AT 09:47PM (MST)[p]
>
>it's alright now...in fact it's a
>blast....
>
>
>Debt's good now. it won't
>be a problem again until
>a democrat is back in
>the whitehouse in 2021.
>
>
>
>
>Stay Thirsty My Friends

With what yer fieldin these days you might be waitin till 2032. Candidate Camacho cant be far off.

#livelikezac
 
Interesting enough read, and I suppose if you are comfortable with historically low illegal immigration being somewhat affected by a wall (given the amount of illegal immigration that comes through the ports, via air, overstay visas etc..) as a national security emergency, then that is your choice. No crying when you don't like the guy in charge and they are using the new low bar for things you hate, though.

Our military recognizes climate change as a threat- if one of these Green New Deal crackpots gets elected how hard would it be to take that and run with it? No vote required, Green New Deal by the stroke of an executive pen with no legislative oversight on spending? Sound fun?



>It shouldn't need to go thru
>the court but that is
>the state of today's affairs.
>You can skip to the
>last paragraph if you'd like.
>
>
>https://www.heritage.org/the-constitution/report/who-responsible-americas-security
>
>
>#livelikezac
 
>Interesting enough read, and I suppose
>if you are comfortable with
>historically low illegal immigration being
>somewhat affected by a wall
>(given the amount of illegal
>immigration that comes through the
>ports, via air, overstay visas
>etc..) as a national security
>emergency, then that is your
>choice. No crying when you
>don't like the guy in
>charge and they are using
>the new low bar for
>things you hate, though.
>
>Our military recognizes climate change as
>a threat- if one of
>these Green New Deal crackpots
>gets elected how hard would
>it be to take that
>and run with it? No
>vote required, Green New Deal
>by the stroke of an
>executive pen with no legislative
>oversight on spending? Sound fun?
>
>
>
>
>>It shouldn't need to go thru
>>the court but that is
>>the state of today's affairs.
>>You can skip to the
>>last paragraph if you'd like.
>>
>>
>>https://www.heritage.org/the-constitution/report/who-responsible-americas-security
>>
>>
>>#livelikezac

Like I said, it's why we have the courts.


#livelikezac
 
But if it's an emergency, how can a long drawn out path through the courts be the answer? Doesn't make any sense. Simple fact is, if there were broad based support for the wall, even within the republican party, it would have gotten done while they had full control. I think it all centers on the fact that the fight over the wall is better to garner support from Trumps base than the wall itself is. A built wall (well funded anyway, building takes time)is no longer a stump speech, and it has been one of his more popular ones with the base. Why get rid of it?


>
>Like I said, it's why we
>have the courts.
>
>
>#livelikezac
 
While Dude was missing in action, he probably does not know that all the Democrat candidates have jumped on AOC's green plan that will turn the voters away from the Dems. Heck even unions are now saying the Dems green plan will bankrupt the country and put Union members out of work.

RELH
 
>But if it's an emergency, how
>can a long drawn out
>path through the courts be
>the answer? Doesn't make any
>sense. Simple fact is, if
>there were broad based support
>for the wall, even within
>the republican party, it would
>have gotten done while they
>had full control. I think
>it all centers on the
>fact that the fight over
>the wall is better to
>garner support from Trumps base
>than the wall itself is.
>A built wall (well funded
>anyway, building takes time)is no
>longer a stump speech, and
>it has been one of
>his more popular ones with
>the base. Why get rid
>of it?
>
>
>>
>>Like I said, it's why we
>>have the courts.
>>
>>
>>#livelikezac

We both know they didn't have 60 in the Senate, that argument is worn out and disingenuous. It was one of his campaign promises, and a reason many people voted for him. The fact he's determined to follow thru on it should be admired, not denigrated. Obama kept many of his campaign promises and resulted in exactly what we predicted, not what he predicted. Yet the left still proclaims him the goat.


#livelikezac
 
>While Dude was missing in action,
>he probably does not know
>that all the Democrat candidates
>have jumped on AOC's green
>plan that will turn the
>voters away from the Dems.
>Heck even unions are now
>saying the Dems green plan
>will bankrupt the country and
>put Union members out of
>work.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> RELH


Gettin his rocks picked will be the least of his problems when hes sittin on that 2 bottom plow starein at the back end of 4 jackasses for days on end!

#livelikezac
 
So its ok to sneak around the system for campaign promises? A lot of idiots are going to vote for whatever democrat ends up the top of the Green new Deal heap in 2 years- which a lot of people are going to be voting for them over. So same deal right? Again are you OK with the precedent?
>
>We both know they didn't have
>60 in the Senate, that
>argument is worn out and
>disingenuous. It was one of
>his campaign promises, and a
>reason many people voted for
>him. The fact he's determined
>to follow thru on it
>should be admired, not denigrated.
>Obama kept many of his
>campaign promises and resulted in
>exactly what we predicted, not
>what he predicted. Yet the
>left still proclaims him the
>goat.
>
>
>#livelikezac
 
>So its ok to sneak around
>the system for campaign promises?
>A lot of idiots are
>going to vote for whatever
>democrat ends up the top
>of the Green new Deal
>heap in 2 years- which
>a lot of people are
>going to be voting for
>them over. So same deal
>right? Again are you OK
>with the precedent?
>>
>>We both know they didn't have
>>60 in the Senate, that
>>argument is worn out and
>>disingenuous. It was one of
>>his campaign promises, and a
>>reason many people voted for
>>him. The fact he's determined
>>to follow thru on it
>>should be admired, not denigrated.
>>Obama kept many of his
>>campaign promises and resulted in
>>exactly what we predicted, not
>>what he predicted. Yet the
>>left still proclaims him the
>>goat.
>>
>>
>>#livelikezac

I believe the precedent was set over 170yrs ago. I just wish we'd handle it the way we did the last time.


#livelikezac
 
>The plan has always been for
>a debt jubilee that's why
>congress couldn't care less and
>Obama went unbridled, spending money
>from all the Auto makers
>debt repayment and settlements instead
>on putting it against the
>debt. Soro's and many of
>his organizations did quite well
>getting monies from Obama and
>the dems for activist groups,
>so where's the concern for
>that?. Congress didn't allocate most
>of that either.
>

Congress didn't allocate the money that Obama borrowed? You are half a bubble off of plumb on that one but we know you don't really care if the debt is run up further, you only care when it happens under a liberal.


>So Nemont since you didn't vote
>for a contender it would
>seem your sense of guilt
>is misplaced against us. You
>threw your vote in the
>trash can which is far
>more irresponsible than actually voting
>for a candidate to make
>a difference like we tried.
>So why do the dems
>insist on hundreds of millions
>for Planned Parenthood......just to get
>chunks of it back as
>campaign monies?


I didn't throw my vote away, I voted my conscience. I am comfortable in my vote. Just because I don't worship at Trump's feet doesn't make me a Democrat. Trump supporters haven't tried diddly squat when it comes to demanding action on the debt. The only thing you want is to borrow and spend more on your priorities: tax cuts that don't pay for themselves, not touch Medicare, Medicaid or the Pentagon and a 45% increase in domestic non defense discretionary spending.


>If the ship crashed on the
>other guys watch after Obama,
>it only set the stage
>for Hillary & co (sure
>thing) to take us to
>the new world order using
>insolvency in their propaganda. How
>else can you explain the
>lack of concern for the
>billions upon billions we keep
>spending on illegal immigrants. The
>laws aren't being enforced and
>there's no intent to do
>otherwise.

So the answer to democrats using the threat of insolvency is to support a guy who is adding a Trillion a year to the debt because he says Illegals are illegal? Makes perfect sense if you are bothered by common sense and logic.


>The new green deal only supports
>their plan to lead us
>down that path, so we're
>at the others mercy, to
>decide our fate...Other countries have
>been insolvent and survived but
>our fate rests in our
>own hands, will we do
>it a free country or
>as socialist's......Freedom really rides on
>the next election and the
>left isn't going to make
>your life better because they
>want to raise your taxes,
>take your estate, and make
>your government more obtrusive than
>any time in our nations
>history. We're becoming a nation
>without borders and without laws
>and that's just one flush
>away from becoming the end
>product in a socialist cesspool.
>

The new green deal is a god send for Republicans in General and Trump in particular. It is not only stupid, it makes every Democrat look stupid. If the election were held today Trump would win going away because all he would have to do is point to the lunatics on the other side.

If it is only freedom you are really concerned about, tell me how saddle future Americans with this debt will ensure their freedom?

Show me where freedom flourished in other countries when they went broke, give me one case where it became the land of the free and home of the brave after a massive fiscal failure of the government. Find one and I will agree we are on the right and only path by following Trump over the cliff instead of a nut job liberal. If we are headed over the cliff anyway, I am sure I don't want to follow either ergo, my vote of conscience. So bash away and let's hear how only Trump can save us by adding Trillions more to the debt.

Nemont
 
>>The plan has always been for
>>a debt jubilee that's why
>>congress couldn't care less and
>>Obama went unbridled, spending money
>>from all the Auto makers
>>debt repayment and settlements instead
>>on putting it against the
>>debt. Soro's and many of
>>his organizations did quite well
>>getting monies from Obama and
>>the dems for activist groups,
>>so where's the concern for
>>that?. Congress didn't allocate most
>>of that either.
>>
>
>Congress didn't allocate the money that
>Obama borrowed? You are
>half a bubble off of
>plumb on that one but
>we know you don't really
>care if the debt is
>run up further, you only
>care when it happens under
>a liberal.
>
>
>>So Nemont since you didn't vote
>>for a contender it would
>>seem your sense of guilt
>>is misplaced against us. You
>>threw your vote in the
>>trash can which is far
>>more irresponsible than actually voting
>>for a candidate to make
>>a difference like we tried.
>>So why do the dems
>>insist on hundreds of millions
>>for Planned Parenthood......just to get
>>chunks of it back as
>>campaign monies?
>
>
>I didn't throw my vote away,
>I voted my conscience.
>I am comfortable in my
>vote. Just because I
>don't worship at Trump's feet
>doesn't make me a Democrat.
> Trump supporters haven't tried
>diddly squat when it comes
>to demanding action on the
>debt. The only thing
>you want is to borrow
>and spend more on your
>priorities: tax cuts that don't
>pay for themselves, not touch
>Medicare, Medicaid or the Pentagon
>and a 45% increase in
>domestic non defense discretionary spending.
>
>
>
>>If the ship crashed on the
>>other guys watch after Obama,
>>it only set the stage
>>for Hillary & co (sure
>>thing) to take us to
>>the new world order using
>>insolvency in their propaganda. How
>>else can you explain the
>>lack of concern for the
>>billions upon billions we keep
>>spending on illegal immigrants. The
>>laws aren't being enforced and
>>there's no intent to do
>>otherwise.
>
>So the answer to democrats using
>the threat of insolvency is
>to support a guy who
>is adding a Trillion a
>year to the debt because
>he says Illegals are illegal?
> Makes perfect sense
>if you are bothered by
>common sense and logic.
>
>
>>The new green deal only supports
>>their plan to lead us
>>down that path, so we're
>>at the others mercy, to
>>decide our fate...Other countries have
>>been insolvent and survived but
>>our fate rests in our
>>own hands, will we do
>>it a free country or
>>as socialist's......Freedom really rides on
>>the next election and the
>>left isn't going to make
>>your life better because they
>>want to raise your taxes,
>>take your estate, and make
>>your government more obtrusive than
>>any time in our nations
>>history. We're becoming a nation
>>without borders and without laws
>>and that's just one flush
>>away from becoming the end
>>product in a socialist cesspool.
>>
>
>The new green deal is a
>god send for Republicans in
>General and Trump in particular.
> It is not only
>stupid, it makes every Democrat
>look stupid. If the
>election were held today Trump
>would win going away because
>all he would have to
>do is point to the
>lunatics on the other side.
>
>
> If it is only freedom
>you are really concerned about,
>tell me how saddle future
>Americans with this debt will
>ensure their freedom?
>
> Show me where freedom flourished
>in other countries when they
>went broke, give me one
>case where it became the
>land of the free and
>home of the brave after
>a massive fiscal failure of
>the government. Find one
>and I will agree we
>are on the right and
>only path by following Trump
>over the cliff instead of
>a nut job liberal.
>If we are headed over
>the cliff anyway, I am
>sure I don't want to
>follow either ergo, my vote
>of conscience. So bash
>away and let's hear how
>only Trump can save us
>by adding Trillions more to
>the debt.
>
>Nemont
Cut more taxes and no need to tax social security.
 
Just being better than Hillary is a pretty low bar to get over IMO but if it is a race to bottom then I guess you all have won by getting the 2nd worst person for the job.

So you are proud of his job on the debt and guaranteeing trillions more, in a booming economy? How can anyone who supporters that believe they are a conservative?

Nemont
 
Nemont Trump is doing a better job then that RINO you wrote in on your ballot. You are the pot calling the kettle black when it comes to who you voted for.

RELH
 
RELH,

If you haven't figured it out I don't much give a shyt about what you think about who I voted for. So keep harping on it because if the choice was Trump or Hillary today, I would still write in somebody else and sleep just fine at night.

Your boy is running up debt at the same pace the previous guy you claim was ruining the country with his debt. $1 Trillion a year, you cheer like a teenage girl at a Justin Bieber concert.

Also if just being better than Hillary is the bar then I guess you don't believe in doing what is right for the country and will rubber stamp whomever the Republicans run.

Nemont
 
Nemont, do you really think we give a crap about you and your opinion. To us you are nothing better then a used car salesman out to screw over the person you are trying to sell a car too.

RELH
 
Ah yes, a broken down retired meter maid who lives on the public dime. If you don't care about my opinion then it is simple, don't reply to my posts and just talk to the clowns who worship Trump like you do. Live in the echo chamber of "Trump is the greatest" and be done conversing with guys like me.

I haven't screwed anybody in business so that again is a an out right lie. Nobody has been forced to do business with me and not a single person has been harmed physically, financially, verbally or even mentally by me or my staff.

In fact I have a file full of cards, thank you notes, letters and other token of people's gratitude for helping them or a loved one be able to know their claims were paid through a horrible part of their life or through their death.

I know you get your rocks of on denigrating small businessmen who dare state that you are on the government gravy train but it is true. Otherwise there wouldn't be a crisis with public pensions.

So you could just ignore my opinions but I doubt you are a good enough man to do that.

Nemont
 
Wow! Nemont you really got defensive there. During my law enforcement career, I found via experience anyone who got really defensive in a interview were guilty and lying though their teeth trying to divert attention elsewhere.

RELH
 
Your best days are behind your enfeebled ass for a reason old timer. Nobody stays in business in a small town for 22 years if they are screwing their neighbors.

I am not defensive about anything.

My experience with most cops is that they deal with scum and soon become
Like their clientele.

Nemont
 
And yet you didn't pick up any of that when Kavanaugh was being questioned? I'd say you're either full of #####, or only observe what you want to believe.


>Wow! Nemont you really got defensive
>there. During my law enforcement
>career, I found via experience
>anyone who got really defensive
>in a interview were guilty
>and lying though their teeth
>trying to divert attention elsewhere.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>RELH
 
>
> Nemont if you can't
>stand the heat in the
>kitchen get out


I am cool as a cucumber.

Nemont
 
>>
>> Nemont if you can't
>>stand the heat in the
>>kitchen get out
>
>
>I am cool as a cucumber.
>
>
>Nemont

you're actually as cold as a cucumber.....



497fc2397b939f19.jpg

GOODWIN: Dems really do love Republicans -- when they're dead...
 
>It has been a long cold
>snap. The high tomorrow is
>-3.
>
>Bad part is the wind.
>
>Nemont

brrrrrrr.....it was only 62 here today



497fc2397b939f19.jpg

GOODWIN: Dems really do love Republicans -- when they're dead...
 
Wyosam You would never made it as a investigator, Kavanaugh came off far better in his interview then Ford. If you could not see that, then you are as dense as a dead tree stump or your TDS has taken away any common sense you may have had in the past. I think you are just a dumb idiot that can be fooled very easy.

RELH
 
LAST EDITED ON Feb-14-19 AT 00:19AM (MST)[p]>Wyosam You would never made it
>as a investigator, Kavanaugh came
>off far better in his
>interview then Ford. If you
>could not see that, then
>you are as dense as
>a dead tree stump or
>your TDS has taken away
>any common sense you may
>have had in the past.
>I think you are just
>a dumb idiot that can
>be fooled very easy.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>RELH


Thanks for your usual calm, level headed, no-name-calling, constructive input Sergeant Friday. You really should get back on your meds.


Edit:
This was the best part. Bravo!!!

https://youtu.be/0vrV4Iiarhs
 
Gee! another TDS victim who can not tolerate being hit in the face with the truth about what some of us think of you and your mental deficiently gray matter between your ears. As if you are a saint, maybe in your own mind.

RELH
 
LAST EDITED ON Feb-14-19 AT 09:19AM (MST)[p]RELH may be a senile old racist . but he's not out of it enough to bet on Trump's reelection . he's stupid but not crazy.

Trump explains it in his own words. he loves debt.







Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
Trump's Dumbest Stooge never fails to disappoint. Even For a retired doughnut eater he sure has let his skills fade, maybe more Ginkgo in the morning will clear the cobwebs from the formerly functioning brain.

If you don't worship Trump and think he is the greatest ever, that means you have TDS? Or more likely are able to see a shyt show for what it is.

Not that it matters to RELH, he is sold out: mind, body and soul.

Takes with both hands, cheers for Trump and loves him some Social Security. Screw the next generation of Americans, they can eat cake.

RELH's new mantra is: "Medicare for me but not for thee".


Nemont
 
AND two face Nemont will be taking with both hands when his teacher wife retires and starts getting that public retirement money from his state. As for the Social security, Nemont, I have told you before that I was able to get out of paying into that around 1980 when Law enforcement was given the option of doing so and depending on our PERS retirement system in CA.

I will ask you again, are you going to deny drawing your wife's public teacher's retirement, or are you going to be the hypocrite we think you are?

RELH
 
LAST EDITED ON Feb-14-19 AT 10:49AM (MST)[p]
Geez RELH, in my experience if you get so defensive it must mean you have something to hide or are embarrassed about taking with both hands.

So are you going to deny your retirement and that Medicare for you is an open checkbook?

Let's see what is left in 15 years or so when I start thinking about retirement. I will bet you now that by then what is available won't amount to a hill of beans because of the people in the boomer generation will have taken it all and destroyed the system.

So yeah, I don't count on anything from the state or from Social Security, that has been beat into my head since I was old enough to understand what will happen when one generation steals from the next without regard to the future.

Nemont
 
Probably not- It is what my dad did, and what he wanted me to go into. After the air force, he spent 20 years investigating capitol murder cases in the public sector, then another 10 or so privately. Well renowned in his field. He though Kavanaugh was full of ##### and looked guilty as could be under questioning. My sister also went the criminal justice route, as a lawyer, now doing appellate work. Also though he looked full of #####. Now, my sister I could write off as seeing what she wants to see, because she is a very liberal democrat. My father not so much. He actually liked Kavanaugh quite a bit until that showing. I think for the most part, all the hearings did was reassure most people of what they already believed, or wanted to believe. Of the people I know, I know a lot more people with a "reason" to think he was innocent (like a person who is excited about a conservative judge) who decided he was probably guilty after the hearings than the other way around- though I do know a few liberals who think he was innocent, too.

I just think its hilarious that you thought nemont was being defensive in an internet post, yet failed to see it in a person well into a legal career has that little poise under pressure. That guy fell apart, and if you weren't clouded by politics, and looked at it objectively, you'd see it plain as day.

Even if he did come off better, which many, many people would disagree with- He has spent his life in this setting, and had all the power. He should have been able to maintain his composure. Especially if he was innocent.

Anyway, sorry to hijack whatever the heck this thread was about.


>Wyosam You would never made it
>as a investigator, Kavanaugh came
>off far better in his
>interview then Ford. If you
>could not see that, then
>you are as dense as
>a dead tree stump or
>your TDS has taken away
>any common sense you may
>have had in the past.
>I think you are just
>a dumb idiot that can
>be fooled very easy.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>RELH
 
Wyosam, him losing his composure is a strong point indicating his innocent. During a interview one of the things a good interviewer looks for is the suspect becoming irate when being falsely accused of a heinous crime such as attempted rape.

If the person fails to lose his composure, it indicates possible guilty knowledge. Stop and think, If I accused you of attempted rape and you are innocent, would you not lose your composure and deny what you feel are outright false allegations especially if I kept pounding home that allegation like the Democrats did to him. Basic 101 interrogations and interviewing.

I am surprised your sister, the lawyer, did not pick up on that point unless she has little trial court experience.

RELH
 
You are talking out of both sides of your mouth. And since you asked, she does have a considerable amount of trial experience. Actually argued a case in front of the Supreme Court about 10 years ago. So get defensive= guilty, completely lose your #####=innocent. It's so simple! You should write a book about cop intuition. Anyway, beating a dead horse again.


>Wyosam, him losing his composure is
>a strong point indicating his
>innocent. During a interview one
>of the things a good
>interviewer looks for is the
>suspect becoming irate when being
>falsely accused of a heinous
>crime such as attempted rape.
>
>
> If the
>person fails to lose his
>composure, it indicates possible guilty
>knowledge. Stop and think, If
>I accused you of attempted
>rape and you are innocent,
>would you not lose your
>composure and deny what you
>feel are outright false allegations
>especially if I kept pounding
>home that allegation like the
>Democrats did to him. Basic
>101 interrogations and interviewing.
>
>I am surprised your sister, the
>lawyer, did not pick up
>on that point unless she
>has little trial court experience.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> RELH
 
So RELH, before I waste any time on it, if I go dig up video of Ford crying and losing her cool you would then change your mind and say she is telling the truth? Of course not because you dont like her. So you switch your story to fit your argument. So your opinion and experience doesn't mean squat. It's just like the MSM being fake news as long as it's against Trump but if they agree with Trump then its not fake.

Legend in your own mind.
 
You two idiots have allowed your TDS take control of your common sense. Wasting time with idiots is a useless endeavor. Crying and losing your cool is two different emotions.

RELH
 
LAST EDITED ON Feb-14-19 AT 07:11PM (MST)[p]Gee Nemont you're showing your ignorance again. I said congress didn't approve every cent Obama spent and many funds given to activist groups which is 100% correct. The President has his own budget and many expenses aren't approved specifically by Congress.

So To prove you're right why don't you show all of us where Congress approved the money Obama gave to Iran with the more than a billion dollar cash payment right before he left office? If Congress approves all expenditures that should be east for you.....LOL You're in over your head again...but it's sure fun playing wack a mole with you.....

Here's a link to show you Obama administration diverted moneys without congressional approval.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/legaln...slush-fund-judiciary-chair-says/#26971ba9cb88
 
Umm it was Iran?s money that was sent. Back to them not US taxpayer?s money. If that is your argument then you are a clueless asshat who is willfully ignorant to fit your own ideas about what is true.


Nemont
 
Yes it was Iran's money that Kerry and Obama gave back to them and they used it to further their nuke program and missile program.
It would have been far better if Kerry had negotiated stronger terms in order for Iran to get that money back. We should have demanded the right to inspect all nuke sites without prior notice and if they allowed the inspections for a certain amount of time, a portion of the money is released. Continued cooperation by Iran would allow more money released over a set number of years that was agreed upon by all parties.

Instead we threw out the baby with the bath water. I do not think Trump would have been that na?ve and stupid.

RELH
 
Does it even matter to you goyim that our allies as well as our own intelligence says the Iran deal IS WORKING ?

The jews want us to go to war, Nutandyahoo said so openly. Trump is a dope being led around by his nose. you chumps are sucking it all up and swallowing it. don't take such pride in your ignorance.


Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
BULLSHIT DUDE, Iran has tested longer range ballistic missles that are capable of carrying nukes. Only one reason to do that and you are stupid enough to believe it is working. when is the last time we had access to their nuke sites for an inspection without a delay as to when it could be inspected. Can you state for a fact that we have access to ALL their nuke sites to determine that they are not continuing their develop program behind our backs.

RELH
 
>Yes it was Iran's money that
>Kerry and Obama gave back
>to them and they used
>it to further their nuke
>program and missile program.
> It would
>have been far better if
>Kerry had negotiated stronger terms
>in order for Iran to
>get that money back. We
>should have demanded the right
>to inspect all nuke sites
>without prior notice and if
>they allowed the inspections for
>a certain amount of time,
>a portion of the money
>is released. Continued cooperation by
>Iran would allow more money
>released over a set number
>of years that was agreed
>upon by all parties.
>
> Instead we threw
>out the baby with the
>bath water. I do not
>think Trump would have been
>that na?ve and stupid.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>RELH

That isn't what Boskee was claiming, he claims any president has their own ability to disperse tax payers paid for money for anything he wants. The money Obama or Kerry sent back to Iran was Iran's money, we impounded those funds way back when the Islamic revolution swept through Iran. It wasn't ours to spend per the law of the land. The money in the DOJ "slush" fund also is not Taxpayer money but rather money that comes from fines, levies and confiscations. It isn't the President's "Budget" at all as claimed.

So whether or not Iran has nuke capable missiles or the Iran deal sucked is immaterial to that argument. It is a complete and separate issue.

Nemont
 
>>Yes it was Iran's money that
>>Kerry and Obama gave back
>>to them and they used
>>it to further their nuke
>>program and missile program.
>> It would
>>have been far better if
>>Kerry had negotiated stronger terms
>>in order for Iran to
>>get that money back. We
>>should have demanded the right
>>to inspect all nuke sites
>>without prior notice and if
>>they allowed the inspections for
>>a certain amount of time,
>>a portion of the money
>>is released. Continued cooperation by
>>Iran would allow more money
>>released over a set number
>>of years that was agreed
>>upon by all parties.
>>
>> Instead we threw
>>out the baby with the
>>bath water. I do not
>>think Trump would have been
>>that na?ve and stupid.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>RELH
>
>That isn't what Boskee was claiming,
>he claims any president has
>their own ability to disperse
>tax payers paid for money
>for anything he wants.
> The money Obama or
>Kerry sent back to Iran
>was Iran's money, we impounded
>those funds way back when
>the Islamic revolution swept through
>Iran. It wasn't ours
>to spend per the law
>of the land. The
>money in the DOJ "slush"
>fund also is not Taxpayer
>money but rather money that
>comes from fines, levies and
>confiscations. It isn't the
>President's "Budget" at all as
>claimed.
>
>So whether or not Iran has
>nuke capable missiles or the
>Iran deal sucked is immaterial
>to that argument.
>It is a complete and
>separate issue.
>
>Nemont
Ok Omar because you say so .
 
Bull$hit Nemont. We held on to it that long. Hanging onto it a few years more would not matter. They should have been required to meet us half way in order for the return of the money. John Kerry and Obama suck as negotiators and sold the farm down the tube.

You can believe anything you want, but we could have gotten a better deal for those billions of dollars to be returned. Iran was hurting that time with economic problems and almost had a revolution by the people who were fed up with their radical leaders.

As hard nose Trump would have said, we have them by the balls, make the most of it.

RELH
 
again old timer. our intelligence and our allies say it's working.


You and a retard reality tv star know better ? prove it or GFYS.














Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
Looks as if some people are thinking of selling Montana to the Canadians , they say Montana is useless.
 
LAST EDITED ON Feb-18-19 AT 09:52PM (MST)[p]RELH,

You phuckun Moron I said the deal, good or bad or horrible doesn't matter you idiot. That isn't the argument Shyt brains. It is whether any president,
From your beloved Trump to the next one, has their own budget and dioesnt need congress to appropriate funds. That is all I stated if your old atrophied gray matter was able to absorb a single thought between reading and comprehending.

The money Obama sent back to Iran was their money not taxpayers money, after that I was not making a judgment about the deal. Either you need more ginkgo or to tap out. One or the other.

Nemont
 
>
> Looks
>as if some people are
>thinking of selling Montana to
>the Canadians , they say
>Montana is useless.


At least Canadians are not like Californians.

I guess we will just have to take our chances with so Tim Horton?s and poutine. Extra gravy and cheese curds. No queer ass salad like you tofu eating Californians consider man food

Nemont
 
>>
>> Looks
>>as if some people are
>>thinking of selling Montana to
>>the Canadians , they say
>>Montana is useless.
>
>
>At least Canadians are not like
>Californians.
>
>I guess we will just have
>to take our chances with
>so Tim Horton?s and poutine.
> Extra gravy and cheese
>curds. No queer ass
>salad like you tofu eating
>Californians consider man food
>
>Nemont
You f#cing moron I'm not making this up I just wrote what I read , you must have found yourself a San Francisco salad in Montana .
 
Looks like our Guru Nemont has thin skin and got his panties in a wad. Typical used car salesman. Oh! excuse me, insurance sales man.

RELH
 
LAST EDITED ON Feb-19-19 AT 08:49AM (MST)[p]Thin skinned? Trying to debate facts with a washed up, corrupt former cop without a firing brain cell is frustrating.


So in your enfeebled mental state can you show me where any president gets his own budget to do what ever he wants without consent from congress or are you still arguing with yourself about the Iran deal? I never said boo about whether it was a good, bad or stupid deal, I said the money sent back was Iran's own money. That is a fact that can be proven.


https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/iran/trump-s-iran-cash-story-oft-told-still-bogus-1.6032057

Nemont
 
The Iran deal must not be too bad. our allies told Pence to go phuk himself when he told them to pull out of it.


RELH doesn't give a FF about the Iran money. it's just a way to divert the conversation from his orange love's problems.














Stay Thirsty My Friends
 

Similar threads

gr8fuldoug
New March Drawing for Kowa Optics
Replies
2
Views
552
gr8fuldoug
gr8fuldoug

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos

Member Gallery Photos and Videos!

IMG_0606.JPG
Fantastic Archery Bull for hoopscoach!
20200725_133501.jpg
Screenshot_20221031_235838.jpg
20211030_083523.jpg
8A33F793-9B12-437F-B1B8-3ECB58A8AF69.jpeg
ABC1D575-EAEF-48A2-8488-DDB3D4F1431B.jpeg
150477.jpeg
AA9D41BC-A4F9-42F5-BC29-6642A356DC9D.jpeg
Good Looking Trophy Typical
005B3775-3F52-41BB-863F-9FD4F24FD7EF.jpeg
IMG_4623.jpeg
Back
Top Bottom