caelkhnter
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 1,526
In reading the post by oldoregon I note the issue of legal vs moral comes up. I agree that the law is there for a reason and that it is usually black and white. I also agree with the notion that you should always follow the law. However there are times when you are faced with a dilema with what the morally correct thing to do is.
For example lets say you are out hunting the monster muley and after a 3-4 hour hike into a roadless area you come upon a small buck that is severely wounded. Lets say his front legs are broken off at the knees, apparently from a bad effort of jumping a fence. You know that you would never take this buck for yourself becasue it is not the trophy you are looking for. Lets say he tries to get up and get away when you approach only to fall to the ground in exhaustion. It is clear to you this buck will not survive and most likely will be sitting there until a predator comes along. You would like to put it out of its missery. But the law says that would be illegal. So what do you do? Just walk away and let the guy suffer? That's what the blak letter of the law tells you to do. Like I said I agree with the notion that the law is there, black and white, no grey issue here, to be followed but gee this seems like following the law leads to a morally bad result. What do you think?
For example lets say you are out hunting the monster muley and after a 3-4 hour hike into a roadless area you come upon a small buck that is severely wounded. Lets say his front legs are broken off at the knees, apparently from a bad effort of jumping a fence. You know that you would never take this buck for yourself becasue it is not the trophy you are looking for. Lets say he tries to get up and get away when you approach only to fall to the ground in exhaustion. It is clear to you this buck will not survive and most likely will be sitting there until a predator comes along. You would like to put it out of its missery. But the law says that would be illegal. So what do you do? Just walk away and let the guy suffer? That's what the blak letter of the law tells you to do. Like I said I agree with the notion that the law is there, black and white, no grey issue here, to be followed but gee this seems like following the law leads to a morally bad result. What do you think?