LAST EDITED ON Dec-26-08 AT 01:40AM (MST)[p]ce61-
Yes, I mentioned... "It [270WSM] kicks similiar to a standard 270 yet you gain back engery and velocity". With that in mind, I was referencing Chuck Hawks recoil table:
http://www.chuckhawks.com/recoil_table.htm As you can see, they are "similiar" with 150gr bullet and considerbly more than the 7mm-08. The 7mm-08 is in the 12-13 lbs range vs. the 270 and 270WSM are in the 17-20 lbs of energy range. Notice many calibers fit into this range of gun (e.g. 30-06, some 7mm Mag loads, etc).
My wife/boys have also shot a standard 270 and 270WSM and both think they kick the "same". Both notice a difference when going down to the 7mm-08. While I realize their opinions or the "same" isn't hard data, I still respect it because it's so mental anyway. Thier mind is going to create bad habits and flinching vs. technique/calibers anyway. Still, I like the data to back it up too so I know the situation I'm putting them.
Overall, my point simply is that the 270 Win is often mentioned as a "kids or woman's gun", when simply it isn't much different then other calibers in regards to recoil. Doesn't mean kids/women can use it. I can see how it fits regarding barrel length, weight of the gun and so on, but still recoil is similiar to others. I just feel if they can handle a 270 Win get a 270WSM and get back some energy and velocity while keeping the same sized gun and similiar recoil.
P.S. - Looking at your numbers, you probably referenced the similiar tables. You also probably referenced 130 gr load out of the 270 Win which is light on elk. I was going off comparable elk loads (140 gr 7mm-08, 150 gr 270 Win/270 WSM). Although we do shoot 140 gr bullets at everything out of our 270WSMs. It is a handload and "reduced" when it comes to powder, but still chronographed at 3040fps.
ODDNUT1
Kirt C.