Task force gives seal of approval

[JakeSwensen]

Legislative committee gives seal of approval to changes for 'big five' licenses

The task force’s big five suggestions aim to increase local hunting opportunities for some of Wyoming’s rarest and most coveted animals, according to Brian Nesvik, director of the Wyoming Game

www.thesheridanpress.com

 

[Chesterwyo]

Nothing more than an avenue to appease the unwashed into accepting transferable landowner tags and outfitter set asides. “But look at the work we did in getting 90/10 done”

 

[jm77]

Nothing more than an avenue to appease the unwashed into accepting transferable landowner tags and outfitter set asides. “But look at the work we did in getting 90/10 done”

Transferables and set-asides are going to be a huge ask that I honestly don't think can happen. There will be some contentious debates when it comes up!

 

[Cahunter805]

Transferable landowner tags and set aside outfitter tags will ruin much of WY hunting if passed. I hope this never happens.

 

[elks96]

Transferables and set-asides are going to be a huge ask that I honestly don't think can happen. There will be some contentious debates when it comes up!

I hope you are correct. I am in for the fight to prevent transferable and outfitter set aside. If they get transferable or outfitters tags, then w can kiss away any access programs we have. I would be ok with private land only allocations as long as they are taken off the NR caps.

 

[jm77]

I hope you are correct. I am in for the fight to prevent transferable and outfitter set aside. If they get transferable or outfitters tags, then w can kiss away any access programs we have. I would be ok with private land only allocations as long as they are taken off the NR caps.

Wyoming already has private land only licenses.

 

[Chesterwyo]

Transferables and set-asides are going to be a huge ask that I honestly don't think can happen. There will be some contentious debates when it comes up!

I hope you’re right. ??

 

[SS!]

I hope you are correct. I am in for the fight to prevent transferable and outfitter set aside. If they get transferable or outfitters tags, then w can kiss away any access programs we have. I would be ok with private land only allocations as long as theyh are taken off the NR caps.

Did you ever get that letter done regarding being against the one shot? Since so many people helped you figure out why you hate it the least you can do is share it with us.

 

[elks96]

Did you ever get that letter done regarding being against the one shot? Since so many people helped you figure out why you hate it the least you can do is share it with us.

Actually I am waiting for a reply from
Water for wildlife. I had sent an email and got no response. I have stopped by twice after work and have not found any one to answer a few of my questions.