Kinda liked Tancredo, from what I saw of the debate.
Romney looked kind of ill at ease to me. I like his take on family values, but don't know much else about him. I think he is out of his league.
McCain? He may be good. I like his anger. I think his age will be a factor, though.
Guliani's got the hole-shot right now. I don't care for him, but it always comes down to who do you think can take on Hillary? Guliani is much more popular than Hillary is. I think that right-leaning special intrests groups better start buying themselves the guy that can beat the wicked witch of the East.
If he has gun control issues, he better start sucking up to the NRA and hunters groups. The guy is grossly moderate-to-left, but he is a better alternative than the "tax the middle class to death" democrats we will have with Clinton or that ex-muslim "gee, though I am half-white, half-black, I'll always be an African-American first" idiot.
Gonna vote for the guy who is strong on border control, immigration, strong on military. Someone against socialised health care. I don't want to foot the bill so some crack-addict can get a bandage on his/her ow-ies.
The closest I see is Tancredo. Unfortunately his electability is just slightly north of Pauls. Conservatives are screwed. The moderates and liberals have got the controls.