SneakAttack
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 1,405
Also posted in the Utah forum.
The video footage is crappy, recorded from a tablet with a phone. I simply wanted to share this piece of public record with my amigos. The entire meeting was over 7 hours long....I chopped out only the discussion of allowing magnified scopes on muzzleloaders. The only formal group representing hunters that addressed scopes specifically during the public comment period was the UBA (SFW may have, not sure). They stood neutral regarding the subject. I understand they are an archery advocacy group, but I wish they would have taken a more proactive stance one way or the other. I have a hard time believing rifle hunters and muzzleloader hunters would hold the attached rangefinder to a bow topic as a neutral issue. I belive this is substantiated in the findings of the survey. That information is available as public record.
Watch "Utah Wildlife Board approves scoped muzzleloaders" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/xgY38aQVzYc
The video footage is crappy, recorded from a tablet with a phone. I simply wanted to share this piece of public record with my amigos. The entire meeting was over 7 hours long....I chopped out only the discussion of allowing magnified scopes on muzzleloaders. The only formal group representing hunters that addressed scopes specifically during the public comment period was the UBA (SFW may have, not sure). They stood neutral regarding the subject. I understand they are an archery advocacy group, but I wish they would have taken a more proactive stance one way or the other. I have a hard time believing rifle hunters and muzzleloader hunters would hold the attached rangefinder to a bow topic as a neutral issue. I belive this is substantiated in the findings of the survey. That information is available as public record.
Watch "Utah Wildlife Board approves scoped muzzleloaders" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/xgY38aQVzYc
