where's the media outrage

> That is sad,where
>the hell is Al Sharpton?
>
2252al-sharpton-35-year-old-girlfriend-aisha-mc-shaw-the-jasmine-brand.jpg


He be getting himself some 35 yr old poontang. All he's missing is the big velvet hat and he'd resemble a pimp.

"Courage is being scared to death but saddling up anyway."
 
>
>> That is sad,where
>>the hell is Al Sharpton?
>>
>
2252al-sharpton-35-year-old-girlfriend-aisha-mc-shaw-the-jasmine-brand.jpg

>
>He be getting himself some 35
>yr old poontang. All he's
>missing is the big velvet
>hat and he'd resemble a
>pimp.
>
>"Courage is being scared to death
>but saddling up anyway."
That no good black S.O.B.,Cornhusker you didn't vote for him too did ya?
 
>http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/201...own-college-ballplayer-oklahoma-cops-say?lite
>
>With all the press the Travon
>Martin case received, I wonder
>how much press this shooting
>will receive. What a tradgedy.
>All because 3 black kids
>where bored, they decided to
>murder a young man in
>the prime of his life.......maybe
>Obama will come out and
>say if he had a
>son it would look like
>the three thugs that murdered
>this white kid.


It's all over the internet. One of the thugs is white. Really, there is absolutely ZERO comparison to the Travon Martin case. Completely different scenario, IMO.

S.
 
All B.S. aside you have the young boys who shot the baby in the face we are facing a nation of savages.The right to carry law should never go away.
 
I'm all for the right to carry and at specific times do, saying that carrying wouldn't have helped this Aussies as he was jogging and shot in the back. This is totally dissimilar to the Zimmerman case these kids were 15, 16, 17 year old animals who killed because they were board. I think Zimmerman was interested in helping his community whether that was misplaced in his actions is the debate. Martin although not a perfect record with the law had only minor offenses. This case has nothing to do with race and everything to do with justice at this point. The color of these killers or their victim does not matter.
 
Cornhusker, in a way it does. I have seen a picture of the three perps and the one said to be white may be mixed blood.
What matters is that if three white kids gunned down a black person, every black group and certain individuals demand that it be tried as a race "hate" crime.
If it is 3 blacks that do the crime to a white person or hispanic, those same groups keep their mouths shut about any race "hate" crime.

Most states have laws on the books that if it is a race "hate" crime, the penalty is far stiffer then that of a killing not involving race as the motive.

I am willing to bet those three juveniles were smart enough to not admit they selected and shot the Aussie because he was white and presented an easy target.

RELH
 
>Cornhusker, in a way it
>does. I have seen a
>picture of the three perps
>and the one said to
>be white may be mixed
>blood.
> What matters is
>that if three white kids
>gunned down a black person,
>every black group and certain
>individuals demand that it be
>tried as a race "hate"
>crime.
> If it is
>3 blacks that do the
>crime to a white person
>or hispanic, those same groups
>keep their mouths shut about
>any race "hate" crime.
>
> Most states have laws
>on the books that if
>it is a race "hate"
>crime, the penalty is far
>stiffer then that of a
>killing not involving race as
>the motive.
>
> I am willing to
>bet those three juveniles were
>smart enough to not admit
>they selected and shot the
>Aussie because he was white
>and presented an easy target.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> RELH
+1 I also agree that the one (white)is part black.I also believe this is a hate crime.How many white and black people were at the scene before the shooting?Why didn't they shoot a black person.
 
It is coming out now that the two black kids did the murder and the third white or mixed blood was "an assessory after the fact"

RELH
 
Look's as if now their could be another victim.Today on the news a black professor from some university was trying to explain why these young boys did this,the Professor is full of SH#T!this is a HATE crime.
 
The federal government under the 2009 Hate Crimes Act determine if its a hate crime depending if they picked a victim because of race or sexual orientation and a couple other things. Since one of the 3 killers is white and they stated to the police they were looking for someone to kill it is a despicable crime but probably not a hate crime. I'm not sure it matters since they will spend most if not all of their life in prison.
 
I bet you 100,000.00 that it was a hate crime,why didn't they shoot a black?if had been two white kids and part black and they shot a black person they would have been charged them with a hate crime,charge these two and white chocolate with a hate crime let them prove it wasn't.How many white people and black people were their before this happened pretty much a slam dunk for the prosecutor if he is not afraid of the black outcry.
 
The actual trigger man in this has been bragging on twitter for a while about how many white people he has knocked out since the Zimmerman trial.
 
Cornhusker, why do you doubt it was a hate crime?
By todays standards it was ABSOLUTELY a hate crime.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/2...alian-college-student-in-oklahoma-has-racist/

Read the supposed tweets. If this was white on black it would be a no brainer. The feds would be crawling all over this.

Where is the liberal outrage?




***********************************

Margaret Thatcher: "The trouble with Socialism is, sooner or later you run out of other people's money."


"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own." - Unknown
 
I'm thinking these so called black leaders best be steppen up to this bull ##### before ##### hits the fan,if not maybe we could ship the three to Australia and the special forces take care of it or maybe a half dozen of them could come here and take care of the gang problem,they wouldn't need guns just a good knife and their hands.
 
What are "hate crimes?"

A federal law passed in 1994 (Public Law 103-322) defines a "hate crime" as "a crime in which the defendant intentionally selects a victim, or in the case of a property crime, the property that is the object of the crime, because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, gender, disability, or sexual orientation of any person."

So is it a random act where boredom led these thugs to go kill this innocent guy as Faux reports from your article Paul? Did they target him because he was white? The law posted above does create a difference in prosecution.

Didn't this article start out where is the media outrage? It,s on every media outlet and I just watch Jesse Jackson say that these criminals need to be brought to pay the greatest penalty possible for this crime.


The one kids mother at least is as white as me an I'm Swedish and Norwegian ancestory.


"It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to post and remove all doubt."
 
>What are "hate crimes?"
>
>A federal law passed in 1994
>(Public Law 103-322) defines a
>"hate crime" as "a crime
>in which the defendant intentionally
>selects a victim, or in
>the case of a property
>crime, the property that is
>the object of the crime,
>because of the actual or
>perceived race, color, religion, national
>origin, ethnicity, gender, disability, or
>sexual orientation of any person."
>
>
>So is it a random act
>where boredom led these thugs
>to go kill this innocent
>guy as Faux reports from
>your article Paul? Did
>they target him because he
>was white? The law posted
>above does create a difference
>in prosecution.
>
>Didn't this article start out where
>is the media outrage?
>It,s on every media outlet
>and I just watch Jesse
>Jackson say that these criminals
>need to be brought to
>pay the greatest penalty possible
>for this crime.
>
>
>The one kids mother at least
>is as white as me
>an I'm Swedish and Norwegian
>ancestory.
>
>
>"It is better to remain silent
>and be thought a fool
>than to post and remove
>all doubt."


Corn, I did not establish the standard of what is a hate crime. I would think an argument could be made that all crimes are hate crimes.

It is the liberal haters and race mongers that came up with the term and the additional legal penalties.
Any of these recently publicized black on white crimes, if reversed would be stellar white on black hate crimes.
To suggest anything else is completely intellectually dishonest.

The whole faux thing is liberal rhetoric. I will not insult your intelligence if you do not insult mine.
 
That's always been the problem with debating you, you make sense and your posts are logical. More difference has to exist before you can have a good debate, translation we need Dude. I feel most homicides and assaults are hate crimes I almost wrote that in the previous post. The issue is what meets the federal statuary level that can be prosecuted. Many more hate crimes prosecuted than I realized, often against gays. I included the quote because I liked it not a shot at you or anyone else.
 
The main issue here is the notion that hate crimes can only be committed by "WHITE PEOPLE."

Goes along with the idea that racism is a white man's disease!
 
>That's always been the problem with
>debating you, you make sense
>and your posts are logical.
> More difference has to
>exist before you can have
>a good debate, translation we
>need Dude. I feel
>most homicides and assaults are
>hate crimes I almost wrote
>that in the previous post.
> The issue is what
>meets the federal statuary level
>that can be prosecuted.
>Many more hate crimes prosecuted
>than I realized, often against
>gays. I included the
>quote because I liked it
>not a shot at you
>or anyone else.


I am sure we are not to far apart on any of this.

My original post here and the other one were for only one reason. With recent events (Zimmerman ) and its propagation by the media and on up to our President I think there is a real need for the hypocrisy to be exposed.
There is to much of the attitude that, my side supports it so no matter how unprincipled the position is, I will ignore or even support a deceitful affair.

I agree, as much as 440 likes to provoke, he does keep many conversations honest.

***********************************

Margaret Thatcher: "The trouble with Socialism is, sooner or later you run out of other people's money."


"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own." - Unknown
 
white on black crime is racism/hate crime. Black on white crime (even with a confession of hatred of whites) is random violence. Or so it appears. Blacks aren't capable of racism, or if they are it's justifiable.

Eel
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-24-13 AT 10:57AM (MST)[p]Cornhusker, sir you are absolutely correct. This appears to have no more to do with race than the Travon Martin fiasco.My point is, this story will never gain traction with the media like the Martin/Zimmerman case did because it was a black on white crime. Turn the tables and the media, liberals, and this administration are as giddy as a 14 year old girl at a Justin Beiber concert.Racism is alive and well in America thanks to the liberals who perpetuate it.I guess you do what you do to get votes.

By the way, did you see where an 88 year old WWII veteran was savegly beaten to death by two black teenage thugs just a couple days ago in WA....you think this story will gain much traction with the liberal press?

Apparently the liberal media has some magical wedge that allows them to pry open the minds of these killers and determine what they were thinking at the time the crime was committed.
 
>What are "hate crimes?"
>
>A federal law passed in 1994
>(Public Law 103-322) defines a
>"hate crime" as "a crime
>in which the defendant intentionally
>selects a victim, or in
>the case of a property
>crime, the property that is
>the object of the crime,
>because of the actual or
>perceived race, color, religion, national
>origin, ethnicity, gender, disability, or
>sexual orientation of any person."
>
>
>So is it a random act
>where boredom led these thugs
>to go kill this innocent
>guy as Faux reports from
>your article Paul? Did
>they target him because he
>was white? The law posted
>above does create a difference
>in prosecution.
>
>Didn't this article start out where
>is the media outrage?
>It,s on every media outlet
>and I just watch Jesse
>Jackson say that these criminals
>need to be brought to
>pay the greatest penalty possible
>for this crime.
>
>
>The one kids mother at least
>is as white as me
>an I'm Swedish and Norwegian
>ancestory.
>
>
>"It is better to remain silent
>and be thought a fool
>than to post and remove
>all doubt."

Corn- it seems very likely that the mixed blood black kid is being called white for convenience by the media and people like you. It was a hate crime plain and simple. The so called white kid is no more white than our president and look at his affection for white people. The laws and bias should be applied equally to all races - not only for convenience for the black population.
 
This is the truest barometer of the liberal party yet. Cry foul over a sanctioned self defense yet ignore a heinous violent crime committed in the name of boredom. The news is full every day with headlines of outrageous behavior by B on B crimes yet it is never noted by our politicians or mainscream press.
It is telling that this behavior presents itself over and over aging without any comment form the black leadership nor black public.
One 17 year old try's to jack a "white" male and gets killed in self defense and the whole black community comes unglued. Go figure....





Stop Global Whining
 
Black on black, black on white, black on mexican...doesn't matter.

The only crime that matters is when a whitey,(or a half hispanic jew will do as long as he looks white), kills a black hood rat!

NEVER FORGET THAT THE POOR BLACKIES WERE OPPRESSED...even the ones in Atlanta living in million dollar homes!!!
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom