mule deer pick

werre300

New Member
Messages
0
took this while elk hunting in the late season..........what do you think the score is .........i am new to scoring but most have said around 150..............he looks like a shooter to me.......

4600387d5e122710.jpg
 
165 is my guess cant see the main beams real well but looks like a decent buck.
Was you hunting Wyoming?
 
yeah wyoming.....good guess...we saw about 3 or 4 that size and 3 larger ones..........this is the only pic i got cuz the critter was so close.........I spose in december they are not too afraid.....i was just curious who thought this was a shooter buck or not..........
 
Go after the 3 that were larger than this buck this year they just might grow into some hogs this year even the buck in the photo if he puts on a little width and puts on a little more length would be a nice buck if you ask me.
Now lets guess what unit that deer was in.
Deer unit 116.Just a guess.
 
i would guess in the mid 160's maybe as high as 170. his fronts suck but the backs are awesome with decent mass. i have a 155 buck and that one is definitely in the next bracket. neat picture.
 
i have another pick but i need to grab it off my video camera........its a side shot .............should be able to see the fronts....i won't say the unit but he is on public land in a general deer area.
 
were300-Pass on that buck particularly if you know bigger bucks are in the vicinity. Late in the season, general hunt, shoot it. better buck than 90% of the other guys will get.

Warbird- That buck is pushing the 180 or better mark. Could be pushing 190 gross if the front fork on the passenger side matches the drivers side. Cant quite tell in that pic. Cant imagine too many situations where i'm not gonna pull the trigger.
 
the 1st buck is mid 160s maybe even 170 that last pic is a dandy thats for sure. 190s or even 200 he is big
 
A shooter is in the eye of the beholder. I would guess him in the low 160's. And Warbirds buck, why you got to throw a picture of that in there??? I'm already getting stir crazy about next fall and chasing pig muleys.

Rackem

P1010176.jpg


**************************************
INTERVIEW WITH GOD
http://www.livingwaters.com/interview/index.shtml
 
LAST EDITED ON Mar-20-07 AT 05:41PM (MST)[p]LAST EDITED ON Mar-20-07 AT 05:39?PM (MST)

Sorry Rackem,
I hate to bother you again but how wide is this buck?This is a little grainy but thats as good as it gets taking photos from my video.I have no idea what this buck would score throw out some scores for fun and guess his outside width also.
46006f444aed115b.jpg
 
460075855dcd2667.jpg

Here is a buck that we filmed that looks like a younger buck that might have the genes of the big typical I posted a couple pics. up above.
This buck has some serious length and good main beams.
Guess this bucks score I have no idea on this one never found his sheds hes not real wide but he is deep.I would take one like this during a hunt thats for sure.
Sorry again Rackem, this might hold you over until hunting season.
 
1st buck 170- he's bigger than you might think
2nd buck 190- oh yeah !
3rd buck- eastmans calender/racks calender/king calendar
M WAITE, AZ.
 
LAST EDITED ON Mar-20-07 AT 06:30PM (MST)[p]If that top buck is 170" then I want you guys to measure my bucks for now on! :) However, photos have fooled me before. I'm saying 155-160" (net) max......weak MB's, G1's & G4's hurt him, IMO.

BOHNTR )))---------->
 
I have to agree with BOHNTR on this. Inside spread is minimal and main beams couldn't be more than 20 inches in my opinion. Great back forks could make up some of this but this buck is not over 160 IMO. I have a buck that is VERY similar to this one and he only scores 153. He is still a great buck and a shooter for many people in many situations but I think a realistic score is 150-160.
 
I'm guesing 160 and then 185 on the next one. Who cares about the wide bugger. BOOM!!!!!!!!!!! and the next dudes forks, yowzzer!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
LAST EDITED ON Mar-21-07 AT 05:09PM (MST)[p]warbird,
I don't know if those pictures make me happy or sad, but I'll take it. You definitely have filmed some monsters that would be a trophy in anyone's book. I have no idea what to make of that wide buck, he is just sick....

Rackem

P1010176.jpg


**************************************
INTERVIEW WITH GOD
http://www.livingwaters.com/interview/index.shtml
 
I'd shoot em both. Then again my trigger finger is a little itchy right now. I am going pig hunting soon. So that might ease it a little. Those are nice bucks though.
 
this is a 170" deer easy ! I too have several like this- look at the bases- THICKNESS IS A VIRTUE ! those back forks are DEEEEEEEP- (and cold too- ha ha !) this is an exceptional buck- you all are just stuck on the calendar deer ! this deer is past his ears, not as wide but tall, thick, and deep forks- he'll hit 170" no doubt.
M WAITE, AZ.
 
(last picture)looking at this Nice Buck, I think you looking at a mid to top end 180's buck with all the kickers he's gross should be pretty high.

The wide one Please give me a shot I don't care how wide or what he scores He would do the trick for me.
 
LAST EDITED ON Mar-25-07 AT 08:44AM (MST)[p]http://www.monstermuleys.info/dcforum/User_files/460688d94a26544d.jpg
This buck has weak fronts also and gross scored right at 169 7/8 gross. That is why I think the buck in the very top photo could go between 165-170 gross.Could be wrong this has been a great thread for looking bucks over and guessing scores.
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom